Abstract
Background: The presence of the dental papilla is critical to achieve esthetics in a single tooth implant restoration. Aim: The purpose of this study was to determine if there were differences in the papilla fill between implant and teeth comparing immediate implant placement and provisionalised single tooth implant restorations with delayed implant placement and provisionalised single tooth implant restorations. The papilla fill in these two groups was evaluated using the Jemt papilla index. Results: It was seen that there was no statistically significant difference seen in the volume of the papilla between both the groups. There was a statistically significant difference seen in both the groups on the distal and mesial side from the initial stage go the follow up period of 10 days, 3 months and 6 months. Conclusion: The interpretation of clinical papilla is a difficult task since many different clinical situations can be encountered while studying single tooth implant restorations. The single tooth implant restoration is a specific entity; the distance between the mesial and the distal side of one implant is never the same. Therefore the present study analysed the papilla as a unit and focused on the vertical fill related to the implant and adjacent teeth.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 168-173 |
| Number of pages | 6 |
| Journal | Journal of Indian Prosthodontist Society |
| Volume | 18 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 01-04-2018 |
Fingerprint
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Oral Surgery
- Dentistry(all)
Cite this
}
A clinical assessment of the volume of interproximal papilla after definitive prosthesis around immediate and delayed loading implants placed in the maxillary esthetic zone : An in vivo study. / Nariman, Rushad Hosi; Pai, Umesh Yeshwanth; Soumya, M. K.; Hegde, Rakshith.
In: Journal of Indian Prosthodontist Society, Vol. 18, No. 2, 01.04.2018, p. 168-173.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
TY - JOUR
T1 - A clinical assessment of the volume of interproximal papilla after definitive prosthesis around immediate and delayed loading implants placed in the maxillary esthetic zone
T2 - An in vivo study
AU - Nariman, Rushad Hosi
AU - Pai, Umesh Yeshwanth
AU - Soumya, M. K.
AU - Hegde, Rakshith
PY - 2018/4/1
Y1 - 2018/4/1
N2 - Background: The presence of the dental papilla is critical to achieve esthetics in a single tooth implant restoration. Aim: The purpose of this study was to determine if there were differences in the papilla fill between implant and teeth comparing immediate implant placement and provisionalised single tooth implant restorations with delayed implant placement and provisionalised single tooth implant restorations. The papilla fill in these two groups was evaluated using the Jemt papilla index. Results: It was seen that there was no statistically significant difference seen in the volume of the papilla between both the groups. There was a statistically significant difference seen in both the groups on the distal and mesial side from the initial stage go the follow up period of 10 days, 3 months and 6 months. Conclusion: The interpretation of clinical papilla is a difficult task since many different clinical situations can be encountered while studying single tooth implant restorations. The single tooth implant restoration is a specific entity; the distance between the mesial and the distal side of one implant is never the same. Therefore the present study analysed the papilla as a unit and focused on the vertical fill related to the implant and adjacent teeth.
AB - Background: The presence of the dental papilla is critical to achieve esthetics in a single tooth implant restoration. Aim: The purpose of this study was to determine if there were differences in the papilla fill between implant and teeth comparing immediate implant placement and provisionalised single tooth implant restorations with delayed implant placement and provisionalised single tooth implant restorations. The papilla fill in these two groups was evaluated using the Jemt papilla index. Results: It was seen that there was no statistically significant difference seen in the volume of the papilla between both the groups. There was a statistically significant difference seen in both the groups on the distal and mesial side from the initial stage go the follow up period of 10 days, 3 months and 6 months. Conclusion: The interpretation of clinical papilla is a difficult task since many different clinical situations can be encountered while studying single tooth implant restorations. The single tooth implant restoration is a specific entity; the distance between the mesial and the distal side of one implant is never the same. Therefore the present study analysed the papilla as a unit and focused on the vertical fill related to the implant and adjacent teeth.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85045436299&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85045436299&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.4103/jips.jips_289_17
DO - 10.4103/jips.jips_289_17
M3 - Article
VL - 18
SP - 168
EP - 173
JO - Journal of Indian Prosthodontist Society
JF - Journal of Indian Prosthodontist Society
SN - 0972-4052
IS - 2
ER -