A Comparative Evaluation of Stress Distribution with Two Attachment Systems of Varying Heights in a Mandibular Implant-Supported Overdenture

A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis

Nikita Khurana, Shobha Rodrigues, Satish Shenoy, Sharon Saldanha, Umesh Pai, Thilak Shetty, N. Srikant, M. Mahesh, Puneet Hegde

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: To analyze and compare the stress distribution in an implant-retained overdenture complex using ball and Locator attachments of three heights by means of a 3D finite element analysis (FEA). Materials and Methods: Six finite element models comprising an edentulous mandible with two interforaminal bone-level implants and ball attachments of heights 1 mm (A1), 3 mm (A3), and 5 mm (A5), and Locator attachments of heights 1 mm (B1), 3 mm (B3), and 5 mm (B5), were designed using ANSYS Workbench Software. Unilateral vertical (100 N) and oblique loads (100 N at 30° to the longitudinal axis of the implant in buccolingual direction) were applied. Average von Mises stress values were evaluated quantitatively and qualitatively. Results: Locator attachments showed lower stress values as compared to the ball attachments in all examined areas. The increase in the height of both resulted in increased stress values. Higher values were observed at the implant neck in all models, as compared to the body and the apex. The recorded stress was higher in the cortical bone as compared to the cancellous bone. Conclusions: Within the limitations of the study, Locator attachments demonstrated lesser and more homogenous stress distribution in the implant-overdenture complex in comparison to ball attachments. The stresses generated within the tissues increase with an increase in collar height of the attachment system and therefore, attachments should be as short as possible for more favorable stress transmission.

Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Prosthodontics
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01-01-2019

Fingerprint

Overlay Denture
Finite Element Analysis
Mandible
Neck
Software
Bone and Bones
Cancellous Bone
Direction compound
Cortical Bone

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Dentistry(all)

Cite this

@article{cd03b252771f45b2ae7595279e822946,
title = "A Comparative Evaluation of Stress Distribution with Two Attachment Systems of Varying Heights in a Mandibular Implant-Supported Overdenture: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis",
abstract = "Purpose: To analyze and compare the stress distribution in an implant-retained overdenture complex using ball and Locator attachments of three heights by means of a 3D finite element analysis (FEA). Materials and Methods: Six finite element models comprising an edentulous mandible with two interforaminal bone-level implants and ball attachments of heights 1 mm (A1), 3 mm (A3), and 5 mm (A5), and Locator attachments of heights 1 mm (B1), 3 mm (B3), and 5 mm (B5), were designed using ANSYS Workbench Software. Unilateral vertical (100 N) and oblique loads (100 N at 30° to the longitudinal axis of the implant in buccolingual direction) were applied. Average von Mises stress values were evaluated quantitatively and qualitatively. Results: Locator attachments showed lower stress values as compared to the ball attachments in all examined areas. The increase in the height of both resulted in increased stress values. Higher values were observed at the implant neck in all models, as compared to the body and the apex. The recorded stress was higher in the cortical bone as compared to the cancellous bone. Conclusions: Within the limitations of the study, Locator attachments demonstrated lesser and more homogenous stress distribution in the implant-overdenture complex in comparison to ball attachments. The stresses generated within the tissues increase with an increase in collar height of the attachment system and therefore, attachments should be as short as possible for more favorable stress transmission.",
author = "Nikita Khurana and Shobha Rodrigues and Satish Shenoy and Sharon Saldanha and Umesh Pai and Thilak Shetty and N. Srikant and M. Mahesh and Puneet Hegde",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/jopr.12966",
language = "English",
journal = "Journal of Prosthodontics",
issn = "1059-941X",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Comparative Evaluation of Stress Distribution with Two Attachment Systems of Varying Heights in a Mandibular Implant-Supported Overdenture

T2 - A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis

AU - Khurana, Nikita

AU - Rodrigues, Shobha

AU - Shenoy, Satish

AU - Saldanha, Sharon

AU - Pai, Umesh

AU - Shetty, Thilak

AU - Srikant, N.

AU - Mahesh, M.

AU - Hegde, Puneet

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Purpose: To analyze and compare the stress distribution in an implant-retained overdenture complex using ball and Locator attachments of three heights by means of a 3D finite element analysis (FEA). Materials and Methods: Six finite element models comprising an edentulous mandible with two interforaminal bone-level implants and ball attachments of heights 1 mm (A1), 3 mm (A3), and 5 mm (A5), and Locator attachments of heights 1 mm (B1), 3 mm (B3), and 5 mm (B5), were designed using ANSYS Workbench Software. Unilateral vertical (100 N) and oblique loads (100 N at 30° to the longitudinal axis of the implant in buccolingual direction) were applied. Average von Mises stress values were evaluated quantitatively and qualitatively. Results: Locator attachments showed lower stress values as compared to the ball attachments in all examined areas. The increase in the height of both resulted in increased stress values. Higher values were observed at the implant neck in all models, as compared to the body and the apex. The recorded stress was higher in the cortical bone as compared to the cancellous bone. Conclusions: Within the limitations of the study, Locator attachments demonstrated lesser and more homogenous stress distribution in the implant-overdenture complex in comparison to ball attachments. The stresses generated within the tissues increase with an increase in collar height of the attachment system and therefore, attachments should be as short as possible for more favorable stress transmission.

AB - Purpose: To analyze and compare the stress distribution in an implant-retained overdenture complex using ball and Locator attachments of three heights by means of a 3D finite element analysis (FEA). Materials and Methods: Six finite element models comprising an edentulous mandible with two interforaminal bone-level implants and ball attachments of heights 1 mm (A1), 3 mm (A3), and 5 mm (A5), and Locator attachments of heights 1 mm (B1), 3 mm (B3), and 5 mm (B5), were designed using ANSYS Workbench Software. Unilateral vertical (100 N) and oblique loads (100 N at 30° to the longitudinal axis of the implant in buccolingual direction) were applied. Average von Mises stress values were evaluated quantitatively and qualitatively. Results: Locator attachments showed lower stress values as compared to the ball attachments in all examined areas. The increase in the height of both resulted in increased stress values. Higher values were observed at the implant neck in all models, as compared to the body and the apex. The recorded stress was higher in the cortical bone as compared to the cancellous bone. Conclusions: Within the limitations of the study, Locator attachments demonstrated lesser and more homogenous stress distribution in the implant-overdenture complex in comparison to ball attachments. The stresses generated within the tissues increase with an increase in collar height of the attachment system and therefore, attachments should be as short as possible for more favorable stress transmission.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85052911074&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85052911074&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/jopr.12966

DO - 10.1111/jopr.12966

M3 - Article

JO - Journal of Prosthodontics

JF - Journal of Prosthodontics

SN - 1059-941X

ER -