A comparison of midazolam and clonidine as an oral premedication in pediatric patients

Sequeira Trevor, Madhusudan Upadya, Chandni Sinha, Manpreet Kaur

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: To compare oral midazolam (0.5 mg/kg) versus oral clonidine (4 g/kg) as a premedication in pediatric patients aged between 2-12 years with regard to sedation and anxiolysis. Methods: Sixty pediatric patients belonging to the American Society of Anesthesiologists class I and II between the age group of 2-12 years scheduled for elective surgery were randomly allocated to receive either oral midazolam (group I) 30 min before induction or oral clonidine (group II) 90 min before induction of anesthesia. The children were evaluated for levels of sedation and anxiety at the time of separation from the parents, venepuncture, and at the time of mask application for induction of anesthesia. Results: After premedication, the percentage of children who were sedated and calm increased in both the groups. The overall level of sedation was better in the children in the clonidine group, but children in the midazolam group had a greater degree of anxiolysis at times of venepuncture and mask application. In addition, midazolam did not cause significant changes in hemodynamics unlike clonidine where a significant fall in blood pressure was noted, after premedication, but preinduction. Conclusion: We conclude that under the conditions of the study, oral midazolam is superior to clonidine as an anxiolytic in pediatric population. Clonidine with its sedative action especially at the time of separation from parents along with its other perioperative benefits cannot be discounted.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)8-11
Number of pages4
JournalSaudi Journal of Anaesthesia
Volume6
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01-01-2012

Fingerprint

Premedication
Midazolam
Clonidine
Pediatrics
Phlebotomy
Masks
Anesthesia
Parents
Anti-Anxiety Agents
Hypnotics and Sedatives
Anxiety
Age Groups
Hemodynamics
Blood Pressure
Population

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Cite this

Trevor, Sequeira ; Upadya, Madhusudan ; Sinha, Chandni ; Kaur, Manpreet. / A comparison of midazolam and clonidine as an oral premedication in pediatric patients. In: Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia. 2012 ; Vol. 6, No. 1. pp. 8-11.
@article{7eb0ae78d51d464f88f15c9327f17777,
title = "A comparison of midazolam and clonidine as an oral premedication in pediatric patients",
abstract = "Background: To compare oral midazolam (0.5 mg/kg) versus oral clonidine (4 g/kg) as a premedication in pediatric patients aged between 2-12 years with regard to sedation and anxiolysis. Methods: Sixty pediatric patients belonging to the American Society of Anesthesiologists class I and II between the age group of 2-12 years scheduled for elective surgery were randomly allocated to receive either oral midazolam (group I) 30 min before induction or oral clonidine (group II) 90 min before induction of anesthesia. The children were evaluated for levels of sedation and anxiety at the time of separation from the parents, venepuncture, and at the time of mask application for induction of anesthesia. Results: After premedication, the percentage of children who were sedated and calm increased in both the groups. The overall level of sedation was better in the children in the clonidine group, but children in the midazolam group had a greater degree of anxiolysis at times of venepuncture and mask application. In addition, midazolam did not cause significant changes in hemodynamics unlike clonidine where a significant fall in blood pressure was noted, after premedication, but preinduction. Conclusion: We conclude that under the conditions of the study, oral midazolam is superior to clonidine as an anxiolytic in pediatric population. Clonidine with its sedative action especially at the time of separation from parents along with its other perioperative benefits cannot be discounted.",
author = "Sequeira Trevor and Madhusudan Upadya and Chandni Sinha and Manpreet Kaur",
year = "2012",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.4103/1658-354X.93045",
language = "English",
volume = "6",
pages = "8--11",
journal = "Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia",
issn = "1658-354X",
publisher = "Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd",
number = "1",

}

A comparison of midazolam and clonidine as an oral premedication in pediatric patients. / Trevor, Sequeira; Upadya, Madhusudan; Sinha, Chandni; Kaur, Manpreet.

In: Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia, Vol. 6, No. 1, 01.01.2012, p. 8-11.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - A comparison of midazolam and clonidine as an oral premedication in pediatric patients

AU - Trevor, Sequeira

AU - Upadya, Madhusudan

AU - Sinha, Chandni

AU - Kaur, Manpreet

PY - 2012/1/1

Y1 - 2012/1/1

N2 - Background: To compare oral midazolam (0.5 mg/kg) versus oral clonidine (4 g/kg) as a premedication in pediatric patients aged between 2-12 years with regard to sedation and anxiolysis. Methods: Sixty pediatric patients belonging to the American Society of Anesthesiologists class I and II between the age group of 2-12 years scheduled for elective surgery were randomly allocated to receive either oral midazolam (group I) 30 min before induction or oral clonidine (group II) 90 min before induction of anesthesia. The children were evaluated for levels of sedation and anxiety at the time of separation from the parents, venepuncture, and at the time of mask application for induction of anesthesia. Results: After premedication, the percentage of children who were sedated and calm increased in both the groups. The overall level of sedation was better in the children in the clonidine group, but children in the midazolam group had a greater degree of anxiolysis at times of venepuncture and mask application. In addition, midazolam did not cause significant changes in hemodynamics unlike clonidine where a significant fall in blood pressure was noted, after premedication, but preinduction. Conclusion: We conclude that under the conditions of the study, oral midazolam is superior to clonidine as an anxiolytic in pediatric population. Clonidine with its sedative action especially at the time of separation from parents along with its other perioperative benefits cannot be discounted.

AB - Background: To compare oral midazolam (0.5 mg/kg) versus oral clonidine (4 g/kg) as a premedication in pediatric patients aged between 2-12 years with regard to sedation and anxiolysis. Methods: Sixty pediatric patients belonging to the American Society of Anesthesiologists class I and II between the age group of 2-12 years scheduled for elective surgery were randomly allocated to receive either oral midazolam (group I) 30 min before induction or oral clonidine (group II) 90 min before induction of anesthesia. The children were evaluated for levels of sedation and anxiety at the time of separation from the parents, venepuncture, and at the time of mask application for induction of anesthesia. Results: After premedication, the percentage of children who were sedated and calm increased in both the groups. The overall level of sedation was better in the children in the clonidine group, but children in the midazolam group had a greater degree of anxiolysis at times of venepuncture and mask application. In addition, midazolam did not cause significant changes in hemodynamics unlike clonidine where a significant fall in blood pressure was noted, after premedication, but preinduction. Conclusion: We conclude that under the conditions of the study, oral midazolam is superior to clonidine as an anxiolytic in pediatric population. Clonidine with its sedative action especially at the time of separation from parents along with its other perioperative benefits cannot be discounted.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84858021979&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84858021979&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4103/1658-354X.93045

DO - 10.4103/1658-354X.93045

M3 - Article

VL - 6

SP - 8

EP - 11

JO - Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia

JF - Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia

SN - 1658-354X

IS - 1

ER -