A comparison of participants and non-participants in the Chennai glaucoma study-rural population

Pradeep G. Paul, Ronnie J. George, Mani Baskaran, Hemamalini Arvind, Madan Raj Augustian, S. Ve Ramesh, Prema Sriram, Govindasamy Kumaramanickavel, Catherine McCarty, Lingam Vijaya

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: To study whether the difference in the demographic characteristics of participants and non-participants could result in biased prevalence estimates and associations. Aim: To compare the non-participant & participant characteristics, and to ascertain if non-response bias is present in the rural population of the Chennai Glaucoma Study (CGS). Methods: Rural participants and non-participants were compared with regard to socio-demographic variables (age, gender, religion, mother tongue, literacy and employment). Results: 4800 subjects aged 40 years or over were enumerated, 82% (3934: 45% male and 55% female) responded. Gender did not influence participation (adjusted OR-1.11, CI: .91-1.36). Subjects in the 70-79 year age group were more likely to respond (OR-1.76; CI-1.31-2.38). Hindus had a higher participation rate than Christians or Muslims (adjusted OR-2.63, CI: 1.80-3.84). The other predictors of participation were illiteracy (adjusted OR-1.44, CI: 1.22-1.70), unemployment (OR-1.28, CI: 1.04-1.58), place of residence (main villages) (OR-1.89, 95% CI: 1.59-2.25) and cottage industry-based villages (OR-6.66, 95% CI: 4.6-9.64). Conclusion: Based on our study findings, it does not seem likely that participation bias will affect the study results.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)125-132
Number of pages8
JournalOphthalmic Epidemiology
Volume12
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01-04-2005

    Fingerprint

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Epidemiology
  • Ophthalmology

Cite this