A comparison of practical and computational approaches to design modular product architecture for products with medium complexity: A case study on computer numerical control machine

Ayushman Choudhuri, Pankaj Upadhyay, Abhishek Yevalkar

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Abstract

A typical methodology for product architecture design of complex products using Design Structure Matrix (DSM) uses a “bottom-up” approach where an algorithm suggests the ideal cluster of components. In the current research, we use a manual “top-down” approach to generate a modular product architecture for medium complexity product. We used a typical computational tool called IGTA for the “bottom-up” approach but found that the algorithm does not produce results which are practically applicable. A manual approach based on critical observation of the functional diagram of the product, product interactions, and verification of the modules using a Design Structure Matrix is more suitable. The paper compares the results of both approaches for the same product architecture considering a case study of a moving gantry based double-actuated Computer Numerical Control (CNC) milling machine. It is reported that manual “top-down” approaches are more suitable for medium complexity products than algorithmic bottom-up approaches.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationResearch into Design for a Connected World - Proceedings of ICoRD 2019 Volume 1
EditorsAmaresh Chakrabarti
PublisherSpringer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH
Pages735-744
Number of pages10
ISBN (Print)9789811359736
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01-01-2019
Externally publishedYes
Event7th International Conference on Research into Design, ICoRD 2019 - Bangalore, India
Duration: 09-01-201911-01-2019

Publication series

NameSmart Innovation, Systems and Technologies
Volume134
ISSN (Print)2190-3018
ISSN (Electronic)2190-3026

Conference

Conference7th International Conference on Research into Design, ICoRD 2019
CountryIndia
CityBangalore
Period09-01-1911-01-19

Fingerprint

Milling machines
Product design
Product architecture
Numerical control
Modular design
Bottom-up
Product complexity
Top-down approach
Design structure matrix

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Decision Sciences(all)
  • Computer Science(all)

Cite this

Choudhuri, A., Upadhyay, P., & Yevalkar, A. (2019). A comparison of practical and computational approaches to design modular product architecture for products with medium complexity: A case study on computer numerical control machine. In A. Chakrabarti (Ed.), Research into Design for a Connected World - Proceedings of ICoRD 2019 Volume 1 (pp. 735-744). (Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies; Vol. 134). Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-5974-3_64
Choudhuri, Ayushman ; Upadhyay, Pankaj ; Yevalkar, Abhishek. / A comparison of practical and computational approaches to design modular product architecture for products with medium complexity : A case study on computer numerical control machine. Research into Design for a Connected World - Proceedings of ICoRD 2019 Volume 1. editor / Amaresh Chakrabarti. Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH, 2019. pp. 735-744 (Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies).
@inproceedings{fecd6dbc9bfa448c9cfa162909c8877f,
title = "A comparison of practical and computational approaches to design modular product architecture for products with medium complexity: A case study on computer numerical control machine",
abstract = "A typical methodology for product architecture design of complex products using Design Structure Matrix (DSM) uses a “bottom-up” approach where an algorithm suggests the ideal cluster of components. In the current research, we use a manual “top-down” approach to generate a modular product architecture for medium complexity product. We used a typical computational tool called IGTA for the “bottom-up” approach but found that the algorithm does not produce results which are practically applicable. A manual approach based on critical observation of the functional diagram of the product, product interactions, and verification of the modules using a Design Structure Matrix is more suitable. The paper compares the results of both approaches for the same product architecture considering a case study of a moving gantry based double-actuated Computer Numerical Control (CNC) milling machine. It is reported that manual “top-down” approaches are more suitable for medium complexity products than algorithmic bottom-up approaches.",
author = "Ayushman Choudhuri and Pankaj Upadhyay and Abhishek Yevalkar",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/978-981-13-5974-3_64",
language = "English",
isbn = "9789811359736",
series = "Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies",
publisher = "Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH",
pages = "735--744",
editor = "Amaresh Chakrabarti",
booktitle = "Research into Design for a Connected World - Proceedings of ICoRD 2019 Volume 1",
address = "Germany",

}

Choudhuri, A, Upadhyay, P & Yevalkar, A 2019, A comparison of practical and computational approaches to design modular product architecture for products with medium complexity: A case study on computer numerical control machine. in A Chakrabarti (ed.), Research into Design for a Connected World - Proceedings of ICoRD 2019 Volume 1. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, vol. 134, Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH, pp. 735-744, 7th International Conference on Research into Design, ICoRD 2019, Bangalore, India, 09-01-19. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-5974-3_64

A comparison of practical and computational approaches to design modular product architecture for products with medium complexity : A case study on computer numerical control machine. / Choudhuri, Ayushman; Upadhyay, Pankaj; Yevalkar, Abhishek.

Research into Design for a Connected World - Proceedings of ICoRD 2019 Volume 1. ed. / Amaresh Chakrabarti. Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH, 2019. p. 735-744 (Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies; Vol. 134).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

TY - GEN

T1 - A comparison of practical and computational approaches to design modular product architecture for products with medium complexity

T2 - A case study on computer numerical control machine

AU - Choudhuri, Ayushman

AU - Upadhyay, Pankaj

AU - Yevalkar, Abhishek

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - A typical methodology for product architecture design of complex products using Design Structure Matrix (DSM) uses a “bottom-up” approach where an algorithm suggests the ideal cluster of components. In the current research, we use a manual “top-down” approach to generate a modular product architecture for medium complexity product. We used a typical computational tool called IGTA for the “bottom-up” approach but found that the algorithm does not produce results which are practically applicable. A manual approach based on critical observation of the functional diagram of the product, product interactions, and verification of the modules using a Design Structure Matrix is more suitable. The paper compares the results of both approaches for the same product architecture considering a case study of a moving gantry based double-actuated Computer Numerical Control (CNC) milling machine. It is reported that manual “top-down” approaches are more suitable for medium complexity products than algorithmic bottom-up approaches.

AB - A typical methodology for product architecture design of complex products using Design Structure Matrix (DSM) uses a “bottom-up” approach where an algorithm suggests the ideal cluster of components. In the current research, we use a manual “top-down” approach to generate a modular product architecture for medium complexity product. We used a typical computational tool called IGTA for the “bottom-up” approach but found that the algorithm does not produce results which are practically applicable. A manual approach based on critical observation of the functional diagram of the product, product interactions, and verification of the modules using a Design Structure Matrix is more suitable. The paper compares the results of both approaches for the same product architecture considering a case study of a moving gantry based double-actuated Computer Numerical Control (CNC) milling machine. It is reported that manual “top-down” approaches are more suitable for medium complexity products than algorithmic bottom-up approaches.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85060309977&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85060309977&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/978-981-13-5974-3_64

DO - 10.1007/978-981-13-5974-3_64

M3 - Conference contribution

AN - SCOPUS:85060309977

SN - 9789811359736

T3 - Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies

SP - 735

EP - 744

BT - Research into Design for a Connected World - Proceedings of ICoRD 2019 Volume 1

A2 - Chakrabarti, Amaresh

PB - Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH

ER -

Choudhuri A, Upadhyay P, Yevalkar A. A comparison of practical and computational approaches to design modular product architecture for products with medium complexity: A case study on computer numerical control machine. In Chakrabarti A, editor, Research into Design for a Connected World - Proceedings of ICoRD 2019 Volume 1. Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH. 2019. p. 735-744. (Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-5974-3_64