A randomized controlled study to evaluate and compare truview blade with macintosh blade for laryngoscopy and intubation under general anesthesia

Ramesh T. Timanaykar, Lakesh K. Anand, Sanjeev Palta

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The Truview EVO2TM laryngoscope is a recently introduced device with a unique blade that provides a magnified laryngeal view at 42° anterior reflected view. It facilitates visualization of the glottis without alignment of oral, pharyngeal, and tracheal axes. We compared the view obtained at laryngoscopy, intubating conditions and hemodynamic parameters of Truview with Macintosh blade. Materials and Methods: In prospective, randomized and controlled manner, 200 patients of ASA I and II of either sex (20-50 years), presenting for surgery requiring tracheal intubation, were assigned to undergo intubation using a Truview or Macintosh laryngoscope. Visualization of the vocal cord, ease of intubation, time taken for intubation, number of attempts, and hemodynamic parameters were evaluated. Results: Truview provided better results for the laryngeal view using Cormack and Lehane grading, particularly in patients with higher airway Mallampati grading (P < 0.05). The time taken for intubation (33.06 ± 5.6 vs. 23.11 ± 57 seconds) was more with Truview than with Macintosh blade (P < 0.01). The Percentage of Glottic Opening (POGO) score was significantly higher (97.26 ± 8) in Truview as that observed with Macintosh blade (83.70 ± 21.5). Hemodynamic parameters increased after tracheal intubation from pre-intubation value (P < 0.05) in both the groups, but they were comparable amongst the groups. No postoperative adverse events were noted. Conclusion: Tracheal intubation using Truview blade provided consistently improved laryngeal view as compared to Macintosh blade without the need to align the oral, pharyngeal and tracheal axes, with equal attempts for successful intubation and similar changes in hemodynamics. However, the time taken for intubation was more with Truview.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)199-204
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology
Volume27
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01-04-2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Laryngoscopy
Intubation
General Anesthesia
Hemodynamics
Laryngoscopes
Glottis
Vocal Cords
Tongue
Equipment and Supplies

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
  • Pharmacology (medical)
  • Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics(all)

Cite this

@article{027114be45344ce1937b91f644774e27,
title = "A randomized controlled study to evaluate and compare truview blade with macintosh blade for laryngoscopy and intubation under general anesthesia",
abstract = "Background: The Truview EVO2TM laryngoscope is a recently introduced device with a unique blade that provides a magnified laryngeal view at 42° anterior reflected view. It facilitates visualization of the glottis without alignment of oral, pharyngeal, and tracheal axes. We compared the view obtained at laryngoscopy, intubating conditions and hemodynamic parameters of Truview with Macintosh blade. Materials and Methods: In prospective, randomized and controlled manner, 200 patients of ASA I and II of either sex (20-50 years), presenting for surgery requiring tracheal intubation, were assigned to undergo intubation using a Truview or Macintosh laryngoscope. Visualization of the vocal cord, ease of intubation, time taken for intubation, number of attempts, and hemodynamic parameters were evaluated. Results: Truview provided better results for the laryngeal view using Cormack and Lehane grading, particularly in patients with higher airway Mallampati grading (P < 0.05). The time taken for intubation (33.06 ± 5.6 vs. 23.11 ± 57 seconds) was more with Truview than with Macintosh blade (P < 0.01). The Percentage of Glottic Opening (POGO) score was significantly higher (97.26 ± 8) in Truview as that observed with Macintosh blade (83.70 ± 21.5). Hemodynamic parameters increased after tracheal intubation from pre-intubation value (P < 0.05) in both the groups, but they were comparable amongst the groups. No postoperative adverse events were noted. Conclusion: Tracheal intubation using Truview blade provided consistently improved laryngeal view as compared to Macintosh blade without the need to align the oral, pharyngeal and tracheal axes, with equal attempts for successful intubation and similar changes in hemodynamics. However, the time taken for intubation was more with Truview.",
author = "Timanaykar, {Ramesh T.} and Anand, {Lakesh K.} and Sanjeev Palta",
year = "2011",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.4103/0970-9185.81838",
language = "English",
volume = "27",
pages = "199--204",
journal = "Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology",
issn = "0970-9185",
publisher = "Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology",
number = "2",

}

A randomized controlled study to evaluate and compare truview blade with macintosh blade for laryngoscopy and intubation under general anesthesia. / Timanaykar, Ramesh T.; Anand, Lakesh K.; Palta, Sanjeev.

In: Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology, Vol. 27, No. 2, 01.04.2011, p. 199-204.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - A randomized controlled study to evaluate and compare truview blade with macintosh blade for laryngoscopy and intubation under general anesthesia

AU - Timanaykar, Ramesh T.

AU - Anand, Lakesh K.

AU - Palta, Sanjeev

PY - 2011/4/1

Y1 - 2011/4/1

N2 - Background: The Truview EVO2TM laryngoscope is a recently introduced device with a unique blade that provides a magnified laryngeal view at 42° anterior reflected view. It facilitates visualization of the glottis without alignment of oral, pharyngeal, and tracheal axes. We compared the view obtained at laryngoscopy, intubating conditions and hemodynamic parameters of Truview with Macintosh blade. Materials and Methods: In prospective, randomized and controlled manner, 200 patients of ASA I and II of either sex (20-50 years), presenting for surgery requiring tracheal intubation, were assigned to undergo intubation using a Truview or Macintosh laryngoscope. Visualization of the vocal cord, ease of intubation, time taken for intubation, number of attempts, and hemodynamic parameters were evaluated. Results: Truview provided better results for the laryngeal view using Cormack and Lehane grading, particularly in patients with higher airway Mallampati grading (P < 0.05). The time taken for intubation (33.06 ± 5.6 vs. 23.11 ± 57 seconds) was more with Truview than with Macintosh blade (P < 0.01). The Percentage of Glottic Opening (POGO) score was significantly higher (97.26 ± 8) in Truview as that observed with Macintosh blade (83.70 ± 21.5). Hemodynamic parameters increased after tracheal intubation from pre-intubation value (P < 0.05) in both the groups, but they were comparable amongst the groups. No postoperative adverse events were noted. Conclusion: Tracheal intubation using Truview blade provided consistently improved laryngeal view as compared to Macintosh blade without the need to align the oral, pharyngeal and tracheal axes, with equal attempts for successful intubation and similar changes in hemodynamics. However, the time taken for intubation was more with Truview.

AB - Background: The Truview EVO2TM laryngoscope is a recently introduced device with a unique blade that provides a magnified laryngeal view at 42° anterior reflected view. It facilitates visualization of the glottis without alignment of oral, pharyngeal, and tracheal axes. We compared the view obtained at laryngoscopy, intubating conditions and hemodynamic parameters of Truview with Macintosh blade. Materials and Methods: In prospective, randomized and controlled manner, 200 patients of ASA I and II of either sex (20-50 years), presenting for surgery requiring tracheal intubation, were assigned to undergo intubation using a Truview or Macintosh laryngoscope. Visualization of the vocal cord, ease of intubation, time taken for intubation, number of attempts, and hemodynamic parameters were evaluated. Results: Truview provided better results for the laryngeal view using Cormack and Lehane grading, particularly in patients with higher airway Mallampati grading (P < 0.05). The time taken for intubation (33.06 ± 5.6 vs. 23.11 ± 57 seconds) was more with Truview than with Macintosh blade (P < 0.01). The Percentage of Glottic Opening (POGO) score was significantly higher (97.26 ± 8) in Truview as that observed with Macintosh blade (83.70 ± 21.5). Hemodynamic parameters increased after tracheal intubation from pre-intubation value (P < 0.05) in both the groups, but they were comparable amongst the groups. No postoperative adverse events were noted. Conclusion: Tracheal intubation using Truview blade provided consistently improved laryngeal view as compared to Macintosh blade without the need to align the oral, pharyngeal and tracheal axes, with equal attempts for successful intubation and similar changes in hemodynamics. However, the time taken for intubation was more with Truview.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79958719685&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79958719685&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4103/0970-9185.81838

DO - 10.4103/0970-9185.81838

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:79958719685

VL - 27

SP - 199

EP - 204

JO - Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology

JF - Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology

SN - 0970-9185

IS - 2

ER -