TY - JOUR
T1 - A study of narrow QRS tachycardia with emphasis on the clinical features, ECG, electrophysiology/radiofrequency ablation
AU - Poptani, Vishal
AU - Jayaram, Ashwal Adamane
AU - Jain, Sharad
AU - Samanth, Jyothi
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020
Copyright:
Copyright 2020 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2021/1
Y1 - 2021/1
N2 - Aim: Atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) and atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia (AVRT) are the most common forms of paroxysmal regular supraventricular tachycardias. Materials & methods: The clinical, ECG and electrophysiological findings of 121 patients with narrow QRS tachycardia were evaluated prospectively. Results: A total of 75 (62%) of the patients had AVNRT while 46 (38%) had AVRT. Pounding sensation in the neck (40 vs 15.2%; p = 0.004), presynope (26.7 vs 56.5%; p = 0.001) identifiable P wave after QRS complex (25.3 vs 73.9%; p = 0.001), pseudo r′/s waves (45.3 vs 4.3%; p = 0.001), limb leads ST-T changes (34.7 vs 60.9%; p = 0.004) were the significant changes observed. A total of 94.7% of AVNRT and 87% of AVRT could be diagnosed correctly considering both clinical and ECG criteria. Conclusion: Pounding sensation in the neck and presyncope along with ECG features like identifiable P wave after QRS complex, pseudo r′/s waves and limb lead ST-T changes very accurately differentiate AVNRT and AVRT.
AB - Aim: Atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) and atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia (AVRT) are the most common forms of paroxysmal regular supraventricular tachycardias. Materials & methods: The clinical, ECG and electrophysiological findings of 121 patients with narrow QRS tachycardia were evaluated prospectively. Results: A total of 75 (62%) of the patients had AVNRT while 46 (38%) had AVRT. Pounding sensation in the neck (40 vs 15.2%; p = 0.004), presynope (26.7 vs 56.5%; p = 0.001) identifiable P wave after QRS complex (25.3 vs 73.9%; p = 0.001), pseudo r′/s waves (45.3 vs 4.3%; p = 0.001), limb leads ST-T changes (34.7 vs 60.9%; p = 0.004) were the significant changes observed. A total of 94.7% of AVNRT and 87% of AVRT could be diagnosed correctly considering both clinical and ECG criteria. Conclusion: Pounding sensation in the neck and presyncope along with ECG features like identifiable P wave after QRS complex, pseudo r′/s waves and limb lead ST-T changes very accurately differentiate AVNRT and AVRT.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85098539713&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85098539713&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.2217/fca-2020-0078
DO - 10.2217/fca-2020-0078
M3 - Article
C2 - 32915064
AN - SCOPUS:85098539713
SN - 1479-6678
VL - 17
SP - 137
EP - 148
JO - Future Cardiology
JF - Future Cardiology
IS - 1
ER -