A study of physicochemical properties of subcutaneous fat of the abdomen and its implication in abdominal obesity

Arvind Kumar Pandey, Pramod Kumar, Srinivas Aithal Kodavoor, Sushma Rama Kotian, Sudhakar Narahari Yathdaka, Dayanand Nayak, Anne D. Souza, Antony Sylvan D. Souza

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Introduction: The lower abdominal obesity is more resistant to absorption as compared to that of upper abdomen. Differences in the physicochemical properties of the subcutaneous fat of the upper and lower abdomen may be responsible for this variation. There is paucity of the scientific literature on the physicochemical properties of the subcutaneous fat of abdomen. Aim: The present study was undertaken to create a database of physicochemical properties of abdominal subcutaneous fat. Materials and Methods: The samples of subcutaneous fat from upper and lower abdomen were collected from 40 fresh autopsied bodies (males 33, females 7). The samples were prepared for physicochemical analysis using organic and inorganic solvents. Various physicochemical properties of the fat samples analysed were surface tension, viscosity, specific gravity, specific conductivity, iodine value and thermal properties. Data was analysed by paired and independent sample t-tests. Results: There was a statistically significant difference in all the physicochemical parameters between males and females except surface tension (organic) and surface tension (inorganic) of upper abdominal fat, and surface tension (organic) of lower abdominal fat. In males, viscosity of upper abdominal fat was more compared to that of lower abdomen (both organic and inorganic) unlike the specific conductivity that was higher for the lower abdominal fat as compared to that of the upper abdomen. In females there were statistically significant higher values of surface tension (inorganic) and specific gravity (organic) of the upper abdomen fat as compared to that of lower abdomen. The initial and final weight loss of the lower abdominal fat as indicated by Thermo Gravimetric Analysis was significantly more in males than in female Conclusion: The difference in the physicochemical properties of subcutaneous fat between upper and lower abdomen and between males and females could be responsible for the variant behaviour of subcutaneous abdominal fat towards resorption.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)OC48-OC51
JournalJournal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
Volume10
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01-05-2016

Fingerprint

Abdominal Obesity
Subcutaneous Fat
Abdomen
Fats
Abdominal Fat
Surface Tension
Surface tension
Abdominal Subcutaneous Fat
Specific Gravity
Viscosity
Literature
Density (specific gravity)
Iodine
Weight Loss
Hot Temperature
Databases
Thermogravimetric analysis
Thermodynamic properties

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Medicine(all)
  • Clinical Biochemistry

Cite this

Pandey, Arvind Kumar ; Kumar, Pramod ; Kodavoor, Srinivas Aithal ; Kotian, Sushma Rama ; Yathdaka, Sudhakar Narahari ; Nayak, Dayanand ; Souza, Anne D. ; Souza, Antony Sylvan D. / A study of physicochemical properties of subcutaneous fat of the abdomen and its implication in abdominal obesity. In: Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. 2016 ; Vol. 10, No. 5. pp. OC48-OC51.
@article{c266c540e1b741a9b95e55dd82f67567,
title = "A study of physicochemical properties of subcutaneous fat of the abdomen and its implication in abdominal obesity",
abstract = "Introduction: The lower abdominal obesity is more resistant to absorption as compared to that of upper abdomen. Differences in the physicochemical properties of the subcutaneous fat of the upper and lower abdomen may be responsible for this variation. There is paucity of the scientific literature on the physicochemical properties of the subcutaneous fat of abdomen. Aim: The present study was undertaken to create a database of physicochemical properties of abdominal subcutaneous fat. Materials and Methods: The samples of subcutaneous fat from upper and lower abdomen were collected from 40 fresh autopsied bodies (males 33, females 7). The samples were prepared for physicochemical analysis using organic and inorganic solvents. Various physicochemical properties of the fat samples analysed were surface tension, viscosity, specific gravity, specific conductivity, iodine value and thermal properties. Data was analysed by paired and independent sample t-tests. Results: There was a statistically significant difference in all the physicochemical parameters between males and females except surface tension (organic) and surface tension (inorganic) of upper abdominal fat, and surface tension (organic) of lower abdominal fat. In males, viscosity of upper abdominal fat was more compared to that of lower abdomen (both organic and inorganic) unlike the specific conductivity that was higher for the lower abdominal fat as compared to that of the upper abdomen. In females there were statistically significant higher values of surface tension (inorganic) and specific gravity (organic) of the upper abdomen fat as compared to that of lower abdomen. The initial and final weight loss of the lower abdominal fat as indicated by Thermo Gravimetric Analysis was significantly more in males than in female Conclusion: The difference in the physicochemical properties of subcutaneous fat between upper and lower abdomen and between males and females could be responsible for the variant behaviour of subcutaneous abdominal fat towards resorption.",
author = "Pandey, {Arvind Kumar} and Pramod Kumar and Kodavoor, {Srinivas Aithal} and Kotian, {Sushma Rama} and Yathdaka, {Sudhakar Narahari} and Dayanand Nayak and Souza, {Anne D.} and Souza, {Antony Sylvan D.}",
year = "2016",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.7860/JCDR/2016/16437.7888",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
pages = "OC48--OC51",
journal = "Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research",
issn = "2249-782X",
publisher = "Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research",
number = "5",

}

A study of physicochemical properties of subcutaneous fat of the abdomen and its implication in abdominal obesity. / Pandey, Arvind Kumar; Kumar, Pramod; Kodavoor, Srinivas Aithal; Kotian, Sushma Rama; Yathdaka, Sudhakar Narahari; Nayak, Dayanand; Souza, Anne D.; Souza, Antony Sylvan D.

In: Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, Vol. 10, No. 5, 01.05.2016, p. OC48-OC51.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - A study of physicochemical properties of subcutaneous fat of the abdomen and its implication in abdominal obesity

AU - Pandey, Arvind Kumar

AU - Kumar, Pramod

AU - Kodavoor, Srinivas Aithal

AU - Kotian, Sushma Rama

AU - Yathdaka, Sudhakar Narahari

AU - Nayak, Dayanand

AU - Souza, Anne D.

AU - Souza, Antony Sylvan D.

PY - 2016/5/1

Y1 - 2016/5/1

N2 - Introduction: The lower abdominal obesity is more resistant to absorption as compared to that of upper abdomen. Differences in the physicochemical properties of the subcutaneous fat of the upper and lower abdomen may be responsible for this variation. There is paucity of the scientific literature on the physicochemical properties of the subcutaneous fat of abdomen. Aim: The present study was undertaken to create a database of physicochemical properties of abdominal subcutaneous fat. Materials and Methods: The samples of subcutaneous fat from upper and lower abdomen were collected from 40 fresh autopsied bodies (males 33, females 7). The samples were prepared for physicochemical analysis using organic and inorganic solvents. Various physicochemical properties of the fat samples analysed were surface tension, viscosity, specific gravity, specific conductivity, iodine value and thermal properties. Data was analysed by paired and independent sample t-tests. Results: There was a statistically significant difference in all the physicochemical parameters between males and females except surface tension (organic) and surface tension (inorganic) of upper abdominal fat, and surface tension (organic) of lower abdominal fat. In males, viscosity of upper abdominal fat was more compared to that of lower abdomen (both organic and inorganic) unlike the specific conductivity that was higher for the lower abdominal fat as compared to that of the upper abdomen. In females there were statistically significant higher values of surface tension (inorganic) and specific gravity (organic) of the upper abdomen fat as compared to that of lower abdomen. The initial and final weight loss of the lower abdominal fat as indicated by Thermo Gravimetric Analysis was significantly more in males than in female Conclusion: The difference in the physicochemical properties of subcutaneous fat between upper and lower abdomen and between males and females could be responsible for the variant behaviour of subcutaneous abdominal fat towards resorption.

AB - Introduction: The lower abdominal obesity is more resistant to absorption as compared to that of upper abdomen. Differences in the physicochemical properties of the subcutaneous fat of the upper and lower abdomen may be responsible for this variation. There is paucity of the scientific literature on the physicochemical properties of the subcutaneous fat of abdomen. Aim: The present study was undertaken to create a database of physicochemical properties of abdominal subcutaneous fat. Materials and Methods: The samples of subcutaneous fat from upper and lower abdomen were collected from 40 fresh autopsied bodies (males 33, females 7). The samples were prepared for physicochemical analysis using organic and inorganic solvents. Various physicochemical properties of the fat samples analysed were surface tension, viscosity, specific gravity, specific conductivity, iodine value and thermal properties. Data was analysed by paired and independent sample t-tests. Results: There was a statistically significant difference in all the physicochemical parameters between males and females except surface tension (organic) and surface tension (inorganic) of upper abdominal fat, and surface tension (organic) of lower abdominal fat. In males, viscosity of upper abdominal fat was more compared to that of lower abdomen (both organic and inorganic) unlike the specific conductivity that was higher for the lower abdominal fat as compared to that of the upper abdomen. In females there were statistically significant higher values of surface tension (inorganic) and specific gravity (organic) of the upper abdomen fat as compared to that of lower abdomen. The initial and final weight loss of the lower abdominal fat as indicated by Thermo Gravimetric Analysis was significantly more in males than in female Conclusion: The difference in the physicochemical properties of subcutaneous fat between upper and lower abdomen and between males and females could be responsible for the variant behaviour of subcutaneous abdominal fat towards resorption.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84968830760&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84968830760&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.7860/JCDR/2016/16437.7888

DO - 10.7860/JCDR/2016/16437.7888

M3 - Article

VL - 10

SP - OC48-OC51

JO - Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research

JF - Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research

SN - 2249-782X

IS - 5

ER -