A Study on Relative Contributions of the History, Physical Examination and Investigations in Making Medical Diagnosis

M. Roshan, A. P. Rao

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

35 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

• Here we report an attempt to quantitate the relative contributions of the history, physical examination and investigations in making medical diagnosis. In this prospective study of 100 patients, with new or previously undiagnosed conditions, we listed their differential diagnosis with confidence score; after the history, after physical examination and after the investigations. In two patients no definite final diagnoses could be arrived even after extensive investigation - these two cases were excluded from the study. In seventy seven patients (78.58%) patients, the history led to diagnosis. The physical examination led to diagnosis in eight patients (8.17%); and investigations led to diagnosis in 13 patients (13.27%). The confidence in correct diagnosis increased from 6.36 on a scale of one to ten after the history to 7.57 after physical examination and 9.84 after investigations - implying that history, physical examination and investigation have their own limitation at each stage and an integrative approach is needed in making a medical diagnosis with more emphasis on history.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)771-775
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Association of Physicians of India
Volume48
Issue number8
Publication statusPublished - 01-08-2000
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Physical Examination
History
Differential Diagnosis
Prospective Studies

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

@article{38efaa4701dc40a88806d639c4b9d029,
title = "A Study on Relative Contributions of the History, Physical Examination and Investigations in Making Medical Diagnosis",
abstract = "• Here we report an attempt to quantitate the relative contributions of the history, physical examination and investigations in making medical diagnosis. In this prospective study of 100 patients, with new or previously undiagnosed conditions, we listed their differential diagnosis with confidence score; after the history, after physical examination and after the investigations. In two patients no definite final diagnoses could be arrived even after extensive investigation - these two cases were excluded from the study. In seventy seven patients (78.58{\%}) patients, the history led to diagnosis. The physical examination led to diagnosis in eight patients (8.17{\%}); and investigations led to diagnosis in 13 patients (13.27{\%}). The confidence in correct diagnosis increased from 6.36 on a scale of one to ten after the history to 7.57 after physical examination and 9.84 after investigations - implying that history, physical examination and investigation have their own limitation at each stage and an integrative approach is needed in making a medical diagnosis with more emphasis on history.",
author = "M. Roshan and Rao, {A. P.}",
year = "2000",
month = "8",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "48",
pages = "771--775",
journal = "The Journal of the Association of Physicians of India",
issn = "0004-5772",
publisher = "Journal of Association of Physicians of India",
number = "8",

}

A Study on Relative Contributions of the History, Physical Examination and Investigations in Making Medical Diagnosis. / Roshan, M.; Rao, A. P.

In: Journal of Association of Physicians of India, Vol. 48, No. 8, 01.08.2000, p. 771-775.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Study on Relative Contributions of the History, Physical Examination and Investigations in Making Medical Diagnosis

AU - Roshan, M.

AU - Rao, A. P.

PY - 2000/8/1

Y1 - 2000/8/1

N2 - • Here we report an attempt to quantitate the relative contributions of the history, physical examination and investigations in making medical diagnosis. In this prospective study of 100 patients, with new or previously undiagnosed conditions, we listed their differential diagnosis with confidence score; after the history, after physical examination and after the investigations. In two patients no definite final diagnoses could be arrived even after extensive investigation - these two cases were excluded from the study. In seventy seven patients (78.58%) patients, the history led to diagnosis. The physical examination led to diagnosis in eight patients (8.17%); and investigations led to diagnosis in 13 patients (13.27%). The confidence in correct diagnosis increased from 6.36 on a scale of one to ten after the history to 7.57 after physical examination and 9.84 after investigations - implying that history, physical examination and investigation have their own limitation at each stage and an integrative approach is needed in making a medical diagnosis with more emphasis on history.

AB - • Here we report an attempt to quantitate the relative contributions of the history, physical examination and investigations in making medical diagnosis. In this prospective study of 100 patients, with new or previously undiagnosed conditions, we listed their differential diagnosis with confidence score; after the history, after physical examination and after the investigations. In two patients no definite final diagnoses could be arrived even after extensive investigation - these two cases were excluded from the study. In seventy seven patients (78.58%) patients, the history led to diagnosis. The physical examination led to diagnosis in eight patients (8.17%); and investigations led to diagnosis in 13 patients (13.27%). The confidence in correct diagnosis increased from 6.36 on a scale of one to ten after the history to 7.57 after physical examination and 9.84 after investigations - implying that history, physical examination and investigation have their own limitation at each stage and an integrative approach is needed in making a medical diagnosis with more emphasis on history.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034252946&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034252946&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 48

SP - 771

EP - 775

JO - The Journal of the Association of Physicians of India

JF - The Journal of the Association of Physicians of India

SN - 0004-5772

IS - 8

ER -