Abstract
Purpose: Acoustic change complex (ACC) reflects brain’s capacity to discriminate the acoustic features present in the signal, hence serves as an index of discrimination capacity. ACC for intensity changes and gaps-in-noise have consistently shown that the ACC threshold is consistent with behavioral intensity discrimination and gap detection thresholds. While, the ACC threshold for frequency change is found to be highly variable. The present study was carried out to investigate the agreement between behavioral frequency discrimination threshold and the ACC threshold for frequency change. Methods: Ten young adults with normal hearing in both ears participated in the study. The ACC was elicited using frequency changing tones, with a frequency change of 5, 10, 25, 50, 100 and 200 Hz. Results: The present study showed that a greater frequency change is required to elicit the ACC compared to behavioral discrimination threshold. In most of the participants, a frequency change greater than 50 Hz was required to elicit the ACC. Magnitude of frequency change had effect on latency and amplitude of peaks of the ACC, amplitude was higher and latency was shorter for greater frequency change. Conclusion: ACC threshold for frequency change does not resemble behavioral discrimination threshold and is variable across participants.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1-7 |
| Number of pages | 7 |
| Journal | Hearing, Balance and Communication |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Accepted/In press - 03-01-2018 |
Fingerprint
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Otorhinolaryngology
- Speech and Hearing
Cite this
}
Acoustic change complex for frequency changes. / Kalaiah, Mohan Kumar.
In: Hearing, Balance and Communication, 03.01.2018, p. 1-7.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
TY - JOUR
T1 - Acoustic change complex for frequency changes
AU - Kalaiah, Mohan Kumar
PY - 2018/1/3
Y1 - 2018/1/3
N2 - Purpose: Acoustic change complex (ACC) reflects brain’s capacity to discriminate the acoustic features present in the signal, hence serves as an index of discrimination capacity. ACC for intensity changes and gaps-in-noise have consistently shown that the ACC threshold is consistent with behavioral intensity discrimination and gap detection thresholds. While, the ACC threshold for frequency change is found to be highly variable. The present study was carried out to investigate the agreement between behavioral frequency discrimination threshold and the ACC threshold for frequency change. Methods: Ten young adults with normal hearing in both ears participated in the study. The ACC was elicited using frequency changing tones, with a frequency change of 5, 10, 25, 50, 100 and 200 Hz. Results: The present study showed that a greater frequency change is required to elicit the ACC compared to behavioral discrimination threshold. In most of the participants, a frequency change greater than 50 Hz was required to elicit the ACC. Magnitude of frequency change had effect on latency and amplitude of peaks of the ACC, amplitude was higher and latency was shorter for greater frequency change. Conclusion: ACC threshold for frequency change does not resemble behavioral discrimination threshold and is variable across participants.
AB - Purpose: Acoustic change complex (ACC) reflects brain’s capacity to discriminate the acoustic features present in the signal, hence serves as an index of discrimination capacity. ACC for intensity changes and gaps-in-noise have consistently shown that the ACC threshold is consistent with behavioral intensity discrimination and gap detection thresholds. While, the ACC threshold for frequency change is found to be highly variable. The present study was carried out to investigate the agreement between behavioral frequency discrimination threshold and the ACC threshold for frequency change. Methods: Ten young adults with normal hearing in both ears participated in the study. The ACC was elicited using frequency changing tones, with a frequency change of 5, 10, 25, 50, 100 and 200 Hz. Results: The present study showed that a greater frequency change is required to elicit the ACC compared to behavioral discrimination threshold. In most of the participants, a frequency change greater than 50 Hz was required to elicit the ACC. Magnitude of frequency change had effect on latency and amplitude of peaks of the ACC, amplitude was higher and latency was shorter for greater frequency change. Conclusion: ACC threshold for frequency change does not resemble behavioral discrimination threshold and is variable across participants.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85041132798&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85041132798&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/21695717.2017.1421813
DO - 10.1080/21695717.2017.1421813
M3 - Article
SP - 1
EP - 7
JO - Hearing, Balance and Communication
T2 - Hearing, Balance and Communication
JF - Hearing, Balance and Communication
SN - 2169-5717
ER -