Active Cycles of Breathing Technique (ACBT) versus conventional chest physical therapy on airway clearance in bronchiectasis A crossover trial

Nafeez Syed, Arun G. Maiya, T. Siva Kumar

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Bronchiectasis is associated with impairment of the mucociliary escalator and retention of secretions within the bronchial tree, making airway clearance a primary concern in the management of bronchiectasis. The objective of the study was to compare the efficacy of Active Cycles of Breathing Techniques (ACBT) with conventional chest physical therapy as a method of airway clearance in adults with productive bronchiectasis. The study design was a crossover trial carried out in Kasturba Hospital, Manipal, and PKTB & CD Hospital, Mysore, India. Thirty-five adult patients of both genders with productive bronchiectasis were recruited. Patients underwent conventional chest physical therapy or ACBT following postural drainage as airway clearance techniques in a random order on successive days. All patients were compared pre- and post-intervention for the outcome measures. Pulmonary function, wet weight and volume of sputum expectorated and visual analogue score (VAS) for comfort of either technique were measured. Wet sputum weight and volume measured after conventional and ACBT therapies showed no statistically significant difference. The measured value differences of the Pulmonary Function Test suggest no statistically significant difference between the two therapies. VAS score comparison for comfort showed a statistically significant difference with the majority of patients reporting comfort in performing ACBT. ACBT in postural drainage positions is found to be equally effective as conventional chest physical therapy in airway clearance of bronchiectasis and patients have rated ACBT to be more comfortable.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)193-198
Number of pages6
JournalAdvances in Physiotherapy
Volume11
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 21-12-2009

Fingerprint

Bronchiectasis
Cross-Over Studies
Respiration
Thorax
Postural Drainage
Sputum
Therapeutics
Elevators and Escalators
Weights and Measures
Respiratory Function Tests
India
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Lung

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Cite this

@article{768a6c01bde04e2281b44f1fd5fad076,
title = "Active Cycles of Breathing Technique (ACBT) versus conventional chest physical therapy on airway clearance in bronchiectasis A crossover trial",
abstract = "Bronchiectasis is associated with impairment of the mucociliary escalator and retention of secretions within the bronchial tree, making airway clearance a primary concern in the management of bronchiectasis. The objective of the study was to compare the efficacy of Active Cycles of Breathing Techniques (ACBT) with conventional chest physical therapy as a method of airway clearance in adults with productive bronchiectasis. The study design was a crossover trial carried out in Kasturba Hospital, Manipal, and PKTB & CD Hospital, Mysore, India. Thirty-five adult patients of both genders with productive bronchiectasis were recruited. Patients underwent conventional chest physical therapy or ACBT following postural drainage as airway clearance techniques in a random order on successive days. All patients were compared pre- and post-intervention for the outcome measures. Pulmonary function, wet weight and volume of sputum expectorated and visual analogue score (VAS) for comfort of either technique were measured. Wet sputum weight and volume measured after conventional and ACBT therapies showed no statistically significant difference. The measured value differences of the Pulmonary Function Test suggest no statistically significant difference between the two therapies. VAS score comparison for comfort showed a statistically significant difference with the majority of patients reporting comfort in performing ACBT. ACBT in postural drainage positions is found to be equally effective as conventional chest physical therapy in airway clearance of bronchiectasis and patients have rated ACBT to be more comfortable.",
author = "Nafeez Syed and Maiya, {Arun G.} and {Siva Kumar}, T.",
year = "2009",
month = "12",
day = "21",
doi = "10.3109/14038190802294856",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
pages = "193--198",
journal = "Advances in Physiotherapy",
issn = "1403-8196",
publisher = "Informa Healthcare",
number = "4",

}

Active Cycles of Breathing Technique (ACBT) versus conventional chest physical therapy on airway clearance in bronchiectasis A crossover trial. / Syed, Nafeez; Maiya, Arun G.; Siva Kumar, T.

In: Advances in Physiotherapy, Vol. 11, No. 4, 21.12.2009, p. 193-198.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Active Cycles of Breathing Technique (ACBT) versus conventional chest physical therapy on airway clearance in bronchiectasis A crossover trial

AU - Syed, Nafeez

AU - Maiya, Arun G.

AU - Siva Kumar, T.

PY - 2009/12/21

Y1 - 2009/12/21

N2 - Bronchiectasis is associated with impairment of the mucociliary escalator and retention of secretions within the bronchial tree, making airway clearance a primary concern in the management of bronchiectasis. The objective of the study was to compare the efficacy of Active Cycles of Breathing Techniques (ACBT) with conventional chest physical therapy as a method of airway clearance in adults with productive bronchiectasis. The study design was a crossover trial carried out in Kasturba Hospital, Manipal, and PKTB & CD Hospital, Mysore, India. Thirty-five adult patients of both genders with productive bronchiectasis were recruited. Patients underwent conventional chest physical therapy or ACBT following postural drainage as airway clearance techniques in a random order on successive days. All patients were compared pre- and post-intervention for the outcome measures. Pulmonary function, wet weight and volume of sputum expectorated and visual analogue score (VAS) for comfort of either technique were measured. Wet sputum weight and volume measured after conventional and ACBT therapies showed no statistically significant difference. The measured value differences of the Pulmonary Function Test suggest no statistically significant difference between the two therapies. VAS score comparison for comfort showed a statistically significant difference with the majority of patients reporting comfort in performing ACBT. ACBT in postural drainage positions is found to be equally effective as conventional chest physical therapy in airway clearance of bronchiectasis and patients have rated ACBT to be more comfortable.

AB - Bronchiectasis is associated with impairment of the mucociliary escalator and retention of secretions within the bronchial tree, making airway clearance a primary concern in the management of bronchiectasis. The objective of the study was to compare the efficacy of Active Cycles of Breathing Techniques (ACBT) with conventional chest physical therapy as a method of airway clearance in adults with productive bronchiectasis. The study design was a crossover trial carried out in Kasturba Hospital, Manipal, and PKTB & CD Hospital, Mysore, India. Thirty-five adult patients of both genders with productive bronchiectasis were recruited. Patients underwent conventional chest physical therapy or ACBT following postural drainage as airway clearance techniques in a random order on successive days. All patients were compared pre- and post-intervention for the outcome measures. Pulmonary function, wet weight and volume of sputum expectorated and visual analogue score (VAS) for comfort of either technique were measured. Wet sputum weight and volume measured after conventional and ACBT therapies showed no statistically significant difference. The measured value differences of the Pulmonary Function Test suggest no statistically significant difference between the two therapies. VAS score comparison for comfort showed a statistically significant difference with the majority of patients reporting comfort in performing ACBT. ACBT in postural drainage positions is found to be equally effective as conventional chest physical therapy in airway clearance of bronchiectasis and patients have rated ACBT to be more comfortable.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=72049105073&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=72049105073&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3109/14038190802294856

DO - 10.3109/14038190802294856

M3 - Article

VL - 11

SP - 193

EP - 198

JO - Advances in Physiotherapy

JF - Advances in Physiotherapy

SN - 1403-8196

IS - 4

ER -