Airtraq in difficult/ failed intubation

H. M. Krishna, N. Shetty, V. Vinodhadevi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: Airtraq has been described for the management of difficult airway. It is not clear from the literature about the utility of Airtraq in situations of failed intubation as a rescue device. This study was conducted to evaluate the utility of Airtraq as a rescue device during difficult/ failed intubation. Methods: This retrospective study was conducted by analysing the anaesthetic data of patients who had failed/difficult intubation to evaluate the utility of Airtraq in such situations. Patient characteristics, predictors of difficult airway, glottic view with Macintosh laryngoscope and Airtraq, number of intubation attempts and use of intubation aides were analysed. Results: During the study period of one year fourteen patients had difficult/failed intubation with Macintosh laryngoscope and Airtraq was used as an alternative rescue airway device in these patients. Intubation was successful in all the patients. Cormack and Lehane grade of the glottis view improved by 1 to 3 grades with Airtraq. Restricted neck extension and modified Mallampati class 3 or 4 were the difficult airway predictors observed in these patients where Airtraq was found to be useful. Conclusions: Airtraq has a definite role as a rescue airway device when intubation fails with or is difficult with Macintosh laryngoscope.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)32-35
Number of pages4
JournalSri Lankan Journal of Anaesthesiology
Volume21
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Fingerprint

Intubation
Laryngoscopes
Equipment and Supplies
Glottis
Airway Management
Tongue
Anesthetics
Neck
Retrospective Studies

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Cite this

Krishna, H. M. ; Shetty, N. ; Vinodhadevi, V. / Airtraq in difficult/ failed intubation. In: Sri Lankan Journal of Anaesthesiology. 2013 ; Vol. 21, No. 1. pp. 32-35.
@article{f325ee130c464710905b3cf4e96cf891,
title = "Airtraq in difficult/ failed intubation",
abstract = "Background: Airtraq has been described for the management of difficult airway. It is not clear from the literature about the utility of Airtraq in situations of failed intubation as a rescue device. This study was conducted to evaluate the utility of Airtraq as a rescue device during difficult/ failed intubation. Methods: This retrospective study was conducted by analysing the anaesthetic data of patients who had failed/difficult intubation to evaluate the utility of Airtraq in such situations. Patient characteristics, predictors of difficult airway, glottic view with Macintosh laryngoscope and Airtraq, number of intubation attempts and use of intubation aides were analysed. Results: During the study period of one year fourteen patients had difficult/failed intubation with Macintosh laryngoscope and Airtraq was used as an alternative rescue airway device in these patients. Intubation was successful in all the patients. Cormack and Lehane grade of the glottis view improved by 1 to 3 grades with Airtraq. Restricted neck extension and modified Mallampati class 3 or 4 were the difficult airway predictors observed in these patients where Airtraq was found to be useful. Conclusions: Airtraq has a definite role as a rescue airway device when intubation fails with or is difficult with Macintosh laryngoscope.",
author = "Krishna, {H. M.} and N. Shetty and V. Vinodhadevi",
year = "2013",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
pages = "32--35",
journal = "Sri Lankan Journal of Anaesthesiology",
issn = "1391-8834",
publisher = "College Of Anaesthesiologists Of Sri Lanka",
number = "1",

}

Krishna, HM, Shetty, N & Vinodhadevi, V 2013, 'Airtraq in difficult/ failed intubation', Sri Lankan Journal of Anaesthesiology, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 32-35.

Airtraq in difficult/ failed intubation. / Krishna, H. M.; Shetty, N.; Vinodhadevi, V.

In: Sri Lankan Journal of Anaesthesiology, Vol. 21, No. 1, 2013, p. 32-35.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Airtraq in difficult/ failed intubation

AU - Krishna, H. M.

AU - Shetty, N.

AU - Vinodhadevi, V.

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Background: Airtraq has been described for the management of difficult airway. It is not clear from the literature about the utility of Airtraq in situations of failed intubation as a rescue device. This study was conducted to evaluate the utility of Airtraq as a rescue device during difficult/ failed intubation. Methods: This retrospective study was conducted by analysing the anaesthetic data of patients who had failed/difficult intubation to evaluate the utility of Airtraq in such situations. Patient characteristics, predictors of difficult airway, glottic view with Macintosh laryngoscope and Airtraq, number of intubation attempts and use of intubation aides were analysed. Results: During the study period of one year fourteen patients had difficult/failed intubation with Macintosh laryngoscope and Airtraq was used as an alternative rescue airway device in these patients. Intubation was successful in all the patients. Cormack and Lehane grade of the glottis view improved by 1 to 3 grades with Airtraq. Restricted neck extension and modified Mallampati class 3 or 4 were the difficult airway predictors observed in these patients where Airtraq was found to be useful. Conclusions: Airtraq has a definite role as a rescue airway device when intubation fails with or is difficult with Macintosh laryngoscope.

AB - Background: Airtraq has been described for the management of difficult airway. It is not clear from the literature about the utility of Airtraq in situations of failed intubation as a rescue device. This study was conducted to evaluate the utility of Airtraq as a rescue device during difficult/ failed intubation. Methods: This retrospective study was conducted by analysing the anaesthetic data of patients who had failed/difficult intubation to evaluate the utility of Airtraq in such situations. Patient characteristics, predictors of difficult airway, glottic view with Macintosh laryngoscope and Airtraq, number of intubation attempts and use of intubation aides were analysed. Results: During the study period of one year fourteen patients had difficult/failed intubation with Macintosh laryngoscope and Airtraq was used as an alternative rescue airway device in these patients. Intubation was successful in all the patients. Cormack and Lehane grade of the glottis view improved by 1 to 3 grades with Airtraq. Restricted neck extension and modified Mallampati class 3 or 4 were the difficult airway predictors observed in these patients where Airtraq was found to be useful. Conclusions: Airtraq has a definite role as a rescue airway device when intubation fails with or is difficult with Macintosh laryngoscope.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84874583338&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84874583338&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84874583338

VL - 21

SP - 32

EP - 35

JO - Sri Lankan Journal of Anaesthesiology

JF - Sri Lankan Journal of Anaesthesiology

SN - 1391-8834

IS - 1

ER -