Amniotic fluid index at admission in labour as predictor of intrapartum fetal status

P. Kushtagi, K. S. Deepika

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

To re-examine the value of amniotic fluid index at admission in labour (aAFI) as a predictor of intrapartum fetal status, in 326 term pregnancies at their admission in labour, labour admission test (LAT) and antepartum risk status were recorded. The different categories were correlated with fetal/neonatal outcome. There were 68.7% women at low risk on the Minnesota scale for antepartum status. The proportion of women with low aAFI (≤5 Å cm) was higher in the high-risk group (8 of 12, 64%, p = 0.0001) and occurrence of significantly higher non-reassuring fetal status (NRFS; 10 of 12 with low AFI, 83%, p = 0.0001). Number recording LAT as non-reactive trace (41 cases) was similar irrespective of the pregnancy status (24 and 17 in low- and high-risk cases, respectively) and fetal status through labour (21 and 20 in fetuses with NRFS and otherwise, respectively). Negative predictive value was similar between the groups (88% for aAFI and 89% for LAT), and LAT was found to be more specific (91%) than 64% for aAFI. Sensitivity and positive predictive values were poor in both. It is concluded that aAFI is not a reliable screening test to predict intrapartum fetal compromise.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)393-395
Number of pages3
JournalJournal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Volume31
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01-07-2011

Fingerprint

Amniotic Fluid
Pregnancy
Fetus

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Cite this

@article{c522ea6461de4e92b360f1b38133d70d,
title = "Amniotic fluid index at admission in labour as predictor of intrapartum fetal status",
abstract = "To re-examine the value of amniotic fluid index at admission in labour (aAFI) as a predictor of intrapartum fetal status, in 326 term pregnancies at their admission in labour, labour admission test (LAT) and antepartum risk status were recorded. The different categories were correlated with fetal/neonatal outcome. There were 68.7{\%} women at low risk on the Minnesota scale for antepartum status. The proportion of women with low aAFI (≤5 {\AA} cm) was higher in the high-risk group (8 of 12, 64{\%}, p = 0.0001) and occurrence of significantly higher non-reassuring fetal status (NRFS; 10 of 12 with low AFI, 83{\%}, p = 0.0001). Number recording LAT as non-reactive trace (41 cases) was similar irrespective of the pregnancy status (24 and 17 in low- and high-risk cases, respectively) and fetal status through labour (21 and 20 in fetuses with NRFS and otherwise, respectively). Negative predictive value was similar between the groups (88{\%} for aAFI and 89{\%} for LAT), and LAT was found to be more specific (91{\%}) than 64{\%} for aAFI. Sensitivity and positive predictive values were poor in both. It is concluded that aAFI is not a reliable screening test to predict intrapartum fetal compromise.",
author = "P. Kushtagi and Deepika, {K. S.}",
year = "2011",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3109/01443615.2011.570811",
language = "English",
volume = "31",
pages = "393--395",
journal = "Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology",
issn = "0144-3615",
publisher = "Informa Healthcare",
number = "5",

}

Amniotic fluid index at admission in labour as predictor of intrapartum fetal status. / Kushtagi, P.; Deepika, K. S.

In: Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Vol. 31, No. 5, 01.07.2011, p. 393-395.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Amniotic fluid index at admission in labour as predictor of intrapartum fetal status

AU - Kushtagi, P.

AU - Deepika, K. S.

PY - 2011/7/1

Y1 - 2011/7/1

N2 - To re-examine the value of amniotic fluid index at admission in labour (aAFI) as a predictor of intrapartum fetal status, in 326 term pregnancies at their admission in labour, labour admission test (LAT) and antepartum risk status were recorded. The different categories were correlated with fetal/neonatal outcome. There were 68.7% women at low risk on the Minnesota scale for antepartum status. The proportion of women with low aAFI (≤5 Å cm) was higher in the high-risk group (8 of 12, 64%, p = 0.0001) and occurrence of significantly higher non-reassuring fetal status (NRFS; 10 of 12 with low AFI, 83%, p = 0.0001). Number recording LAT as non-reactive trace (41 cases) was similar irrespective of the pregnancy status (24 and 17 in low- and high-risk cases, respectively) and fetal status through labour (21 and 20 in fetuses with NRFS and otherwise, respectively). Negative predictive value was similar between the groups (88% for aAFI and 89% for LAT), and LAT was found to be more specific (91%) than 64% for aAFI. Sensitivity and positive predictive values were poor in both. It is concluded that aAFI is not a reliable screening test to predict intrapartum fetal compromise.

AB - To re-examine the value of amniotic fluid index at admission in labour (aAFI) as a predictor of intrapartum fetal status, in 326 term pregnancies at their admission in labour, labour admission test (LAT) and antepartum risk status were recorded. The different categories were correlated with fetal/neonatal outcome. There were 68.7% women at low risk on the Minnesota scale for antepartum status. The proportion of women with low aAFI (≤5 Å cm) was higher in the high-risk group (8 of 12, 64%, p = 0.0001) and occurrence of significantly higher non-reassuring fetal status (NRFS; 10 of 12 with low AFI, 83%, p = 0.0001). Number recording LAT as non-reactive trace (41 cases) was similar irrespective of the pregnancy status (24 and 17 in low- and high-risk cases, respectively) and fetal status through labour (21 and 20 in fetuses with NRFS and otherwise, respectively). Negative predictive value was similar between the groups (88% for aAFI and 89% for LAT), and LAT was found to be more specific (91%) than 64% for aAFI. Sensitivity and positive predictive values were poor in both. It is concluded that aAFI is not a reliable screening test to predict intrapartum fetal compromise.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79957819205&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79957819205&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3109/01443615.2011.570811

DO - 10.3109/01443615.2011.570811

M3 - Article

C2 - 21627420

AN - SCOPUS:79957819205

VL - 31

SP - 393

EP - 395

JO - Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

JF - Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

SN - 0144-3615

IS - 5

ER -