An innovative method of assessing the mechanical axis deviation in the lower limb in standing position

Jagannath Kamath, Raja Shekar Danda, Nikil Jayasheelan, Rohit Singh

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Introduction: Various methods of measuring mechanical axis deviation of lower limb have been described including radiographic and CT scanogram, intraoperative fluoroscopy with the use of an electrocautery cord. These methods determine the mechanical axis in a supine, non-weight bearing position. Although long cassette standing radiographic view is used for the purpose but is not available at most centres. A dynamic method of determining the mechanical axis in a weight bearing position was devised in this study. Aim: The aim of the study was to describe a simpler and newer method in quantifying the mechanical axis deviation in places where full length cassettes for standing X rays are not available. Materials and Methods: A pilot study was conducted on 15 patients. The deviation from the mechanical axis was measured using a manually operated, hydraulic mechanism based, elevating scissor lift table. Patient was asked to stand erect over the elevating lift table with both patellae facing forward and C-arm image intensifier was positioned horizontally. Radiological markers were tied to a radio-opaque thread and placed at the centre of head of the femur and another at the centre of the tibio-talar joint. C-arm views of the hip, ankle and knee joint were taken to confirm the correct position of the marker by varying the height of the lift table. Results: The mechanical axis deviation values recorded by measuring distance between the centre of the knee and radio-opaque thread in cm. This was measured in each case both clinically and from the image on the monitor. The two values were found to be statistically same. Pain was measured on VAS. Mechanical axis deviation values and VAS score were found to be positively significantly correlated. Conclusion: This technique is dynamic, unique and accurate as compared to other methods for assessing mechanical axis deviation in a weight bearing position.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)RC11-RC13
JournalJournal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
Volume10
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01-06-2016

Fingerprint

Bearings (structural)
Posture
Lower Extremity
Weight-Bearing
Arm
Hydraulics
Femur Head
X rays
Electrocoagulation
Ankle Joint
Patella
Fluoroscopy
Hip Joint
Knee Joint
Knee
Joints
X-Rays
Pain
Radio-Opaque acrylic resin

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Clinical Biochemistry

Cite this

@article{e9f4c3beb1e74f95928952d76b3a16cf,
title = "An innovative method of assessing the mechanical axis deviation in the lower limb in standing position",
abstract = "Introduction: Various methods of measuring mechanical axis deviation of lower limb have been described including radiographic and CT scanogram, intraoperative fluoroscopy with the use of an electrocautery cord. These methods determine the mechanical axis in a supine, non-weight bearing position. Although long cassette standing radiographic view is used for the purpose but is not available at most centres. A dynamic method of determining the mechanical axis in a weight bearing position was devised in this study. Aim: The aim of the study was to describe a simpler and newer method in quantifying the mechanical axis deviation in places where full length cassettes for standing X rays are not available. Materials and Methods: A pilot study was conducted on 15 patients. The deviation from the mechanical axis was measured using a manually operated, hydraulic mechanism based, elevating scissor lift table. Patient was asked to stand erect over the elevating lift table with both patellae facing forward and C-arm image intensifier was positioned horizontally. Radiological markers were tied to a radio-opaque thread and placed at the centre of head of the femur and another at the centre of the tibio-talar joint. C-arm views of the hip, ankle and knee joint were taken to confirm the correct position of the marker by varying the height of the lift table. Results: The mechanical axis deviation values recorded by measuring distance between the centre of the knee and radio-opaque thread in cm. This was measured in each case both clinically and from the image on the monitor. The two values were found to be statistically same. Pain was measured on VAS. Mechanical axis deviation values and VAS score were found to be positively significantly correlated. Conclusion: This technique is dynamic, unique and accurate as compared to other methods for assessing mechanical axis deviation in a weight bearing position.",
author = "Jagannath Kamath and Danda, {Raja Shekar} and Nikil Jayasheelan and Rohit Singh",
year = "2016",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.7860/JCDR/2016/17324.8042",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
pages = "RC11--RC13",
journal = "Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research",
issn = "2249-782X",
publisher = "Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research",
number = "6",

}

An innovative method of assessing the mechanical axis deviation in the lower limb in standing position. / Kamath, Jagannath; Danda, Raja Shekar; Jayasheelan, Nikil; Singh, Rohit.

In: Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, Vol. 10, No. 6, 01.06.2016, p. RC11-RC13.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - An innovative method of assessing the mechanical axis deviation in the lower limb in standing position

AU - Kamath, Jagannath

AU - Danda, Raja Shekar

AU - Jayasheelan, Nikil

AU - Singh, Rohit

PY - 2016/6/1

Y1 - 2016/6/1

N2 - Introduction: Various methods of measuring mechanical axis deviation of lower limb have been described including radiographic and CT scanogram, intraoperative fluoroscopy with the use of an electrocautery cord. These methods determine the mechanical axis in a supine, non-weight bearing position. Although long cassette standing radiographic view is used for the purpose but is not available at most centres. A dynamic method of determining the mechanical axis in a weight bearing position was devised in this study. Aim: The aim of the study was to describe a simpler and newer method in quantifying the mechanical axis deviation in places where full length cassettes for standing X rays are not available. Materials and Methods: A pilot study was conducted on 15 patients. The deviation from the mechanical axis was measured using a manually operated, hydraulic mechanism based, elevating scissor lift table. Patient was asked to stand erect over the elevating lift table with both patellae facing forward and C-arm image intensifier was positioned horizontally. Radiological markers were tied to a radio-opaque thread and placed at the centre of head of the femur and another at the centre of the tibio-talar joint. C-arm views of the hip, ankle and knee joint were taken to confirm the correct position of the marker by varying the height of the lift table. Results: The mechanical axis deviation values recorded by measuring distance between the centre of the knee and radio-opaque thread in cm. This was measured in each case both clinically and from the image on the monitor. The two values were found to be statistically same. Pain was measured on VAS. Mechanical axis deviation values and VAS score were found to be positively significantly correlated. Conclusion: This technique is dynamic, unique and accurate as compared to other methods for assessing mechanical axis deviation in a weight bearing position.

AB - Introduction: Various methods of measuring mechanical axis deviation of lower limb have been described including radiographic and CT scanogram, intraoperative fluoroscopy with the use of an electrocautery cord. These methods determine the mechanical axis in a supine, non-weight bearing position. Although long cassette standing radiographic view is used for the purpose but is not available at most centres. A dynamic method of determining the mechanical axis in a weight bearing position was devised in this study. Aim: The aim of the study was to describe a simpler and newer method in quantifying the mechanical axis deviation in places where full length cassettes for standing X rays are not available. Materials and Methods: A pilot study was conducted on 15 patients. The deviation from the mechanical axis was measured using a manually operated, hydraulic mechanism based, elevating scissor lift table. Patient was asked to stand erect over the elevating lift table with both patellae facing forward and C-arm image intensifier was positioned horizontally. Radiological markers were tied to a radio-opaque thread and placed at the centre of head of the femur and another at the centre of the tibio-talar joint. C-arm views of the hip, ankle and knee joint were taken to confirm the correct position of the marker by varying the height of the lift table. Results: The mechanical axis deviation values recorded by measuring distance between the centre of the knee and radio-opaque thread in cm. This was measured in each case both clinically and from the image on the monitor. The two values were found to be statistically same. Pain was measured on VAS. Mechanical axis deviation values and VAS score were found to be positively significantly correlated. Conclusion: This technique is dynamic, unique and accurate as compared to other methods for assessing mechanical axis deviation in a weight bearing position.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84974660110&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84974660110&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.7860/JCDR/2016/17324.8042

DO - 10.7860/JCDR/2016/17324.8042

M3 - Article

VL - 10

SP - RC11-RC13

JO - Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research

JF - Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research

SN - 2249-782X

IS - 6

ER -