Antibiotic prophylaxis in organophosphorus poisoning

A study of health and economic outcomes

Asim Priyendu, K. E. Vandana, Nilima, Muralidhar Varma, Nishitha Prabhu, Alsha Abdul Rahim, Anantha Naik Nagappa

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective: Organophosphorus poisoning (OPP) is a major concern for developing countries. There are no guidelines for the prophylactic use of antibiotics in the management of OPP which in such critical cases might add to the economic burden of the patients as well as antibiotic resistance. We compared the health and economic outcomes in patients prescribed with prophylactic antibiotics with respect to the patients not prescribed with any antibiotics. Methods: A retrospective observational study was carried out for two years for patients admitted to ICU with OPP. Patients were graded for severity of OPP, and divided into two groups based on prophylactic prescription and no prescription of antibiotics. The length of stay (LOS), hospitalization cost and outcomes were measured and compared between the two groups using statistical tests. Results: Out of the 254 patients observed, 108 were prescribed with prophylactic antibiotics and 94 were not prescribed with any antibiotic. There was a significant difference between LOS, cost of treatment and outcomes in the two groups (p < 0.001). When antibiotics were not prescribed, the odds of improvement was 1.854 times higher compared to those who received prophylactic antibiotics although after adjusting for severity of poisoning, significance was lost. On an average, 2–3 antibiotics were prescribed to every patient in the first group. Conclusion: OPP is an important health concern where issues of antibiotic misuse and overuse are practiced. Our study suggested that systemic antibiotic prophylaxis did not offer any advantage over non-use of any antibiotics in patients with OPP.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)332-336
Number of pages5
JournalSaudi Pharmaceutical Journal
Volume25
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01-03-2017

Fingerprint

Organophosphate Poisoning
Antibiotic Prophylaxis
Economics
Anti-Bacterial Agents
Health
Prescriptions
Length of Stay
Costs and Cost Analysis
Microbial Drug Resistance
Poisoning
Developing Countries
Observational Studies
Hospitalization
Retrospective Studies

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Pharmacology
  • Pharmaceutical Science

Cite this

Priyendu, Asim ; Vandana, K. E. ; Nilima, ; Varma, Muralidhar ; Prabhu, Nishitha ; Rahim, Alsha Abdul ; Nagappa, Anantha Naik. / Antibiotic prophylaxis in organophosphorus poisoning : A study of health and economic outcomes. In: Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal. 2017 ; Vol. 25, No. 3. pp. 332-336.
@article{c0d59f886ebd4fa18e4fe3be3ee10207,
title = "Antibiotic prophylaxis in organophosphorus poisoning: A study of health and economic outcomes",
abstract = "Objective: Organophosphorus poisoning (OPP) is a major concern for developing countries. There are no guidelines for the prophylactic use of antibiotics in the management of OPP which in such critical cases might add to the economic burden of the patients as well as antibiotic resistance. We compared the health and economic outcomes in patients prescribed with prophylactic antibiotics with respect to the patients not prescribed with any antibiotics. Methods: A retrospective observational study was carried out for two years for patients admitted to ICU with OPP. Patients were graded for severity of OPP, and divided into two groups based on prophylactic prescription and no prescription of antibiotics. The length of stay (LOS), hospitalization cost and outcomes were measured and compared between the two groups using statistical tests. Results: Out of the 254 patients observed, 108 were prescribed with prophylactic antibiotics and 94 were not prescribed with any antibiotic. There was a significant difference between LOS, cost of treatment and outcomes in the two groups (p < 0.001). When antibiotics were not prescribed, the odds of improvement was 1.854 times higher compared to those who received prophylactic antibiotics although after adjusting for severity of poisoning, significance was lost. On an average, 2–3 antibiotics were prescribed to every patient in the first group. Conclusion: OPP is an important health concern where issues of antibiotic misuse and overuse are practiced. Our study suggested that systemic antibiotic prophylaxis did not offer any advantage over non-use of any antibiotics in patients with OPP.",
author = "Asim Priyendu and Vandana, {K. E.} and Nilima and Muralidhar Varma and Nishitha Prabhu and Rahim, {Alsha Abdul} and Nagappa, {Anantha Naik}",
year = "2017",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jsps.2016.07.006",
language = "English",
volume = "25",
pages = "332--336",
journal = "Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal",
issn = "1319-0164",
publisher = "King Saud University",
number = "3",

}

Antibiotic prophylaxis in organophosphorus poisoning : A study of health and economic outcomes. / Priyendu, Asim; Vandana, K. E.; Nilima, ; Varma, Muralidhar; Prabhu, Nishitha; Rahim, Alsha Abdul; Nagappa, Anantha Naik.

In: Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal, Vol. 25, No. 3, 01.03.2017, p. 332-336.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Antibiotic prophylaxis in organophosphorus poisoning

T2 - A study of health and economic outcomes

AU - Priyendu, Asim

AU - Vandana, K. E.

AU - Nilima,

AU - Varma, Muralidhar

AU - Prabhu, Nishitha

AU - Rahim, Alsha Abdul

AU - Nagappa, Anantha Naik

PY - 2017/3/1

Y1 - 2017/3/1

N2 - Objective: Organophosphorus poisoning (OPP) is a major concern for developing countries. There are no guidelines for the prophylactic use of antibiotics in the management of OPP which in such critical cases might add to the economic burden of the patients as well as antibiotic resistance. We compared the health and economic outcomes in patients prescribed with prophylactic antibiotics with respect to the patients not prescribed with any antibiotics. Methods: A retrospective observational study was carried out for two years for patients admitted to ICU with OPP. Patients were graded for severity of OPP, and divided into two groups based on prophylactic prescription and no prescription of antibiotics. The length of stay (LOS), hospitalization cost and outcomes were measured and compared between the two groups using statistical tests. Results: Out of the 254 patients observed, 108 were prescribed with prophylactic antibiotics and 94 were not prescribed with any antibiotic. There was a significant difference between LOS, cost of treatment and outcomes in the two groups (p < 0.001). When antibiotics were not prescribed, the odds of improvement was 1.854 times higher compared to those who received prophylactic antibiotics although after adjusting for severity of poisoning, significance was lost. On an average, 2–3 antibiotics were prescribed to every patient in the first group. Conclusion: OPP is an important health concern where issues of antibiotic misuse and overuse are practiced. Our study suggested that systemic antibiotic prophylaxis did not offer any advantage over non-use of any antibiotics in patients with OPP.

AB - Objective: Organophosphorus poisoning (OPP) is a major concern for developing countries. There are no guidelines for the prophylactic use of antibiotics in the management of OPP which in such critical cases might add to the economic burden of the patients as well as antibiotic resistance. We compared the health and economic outcomes in patients prescribed with prophylactic antibiotics with respect to the patients not prescribed with any antibiotics. Methods: A retrospective observational study was carried out for two years for patients admitted to ICU with OPP. Patients were graded for severity of OPP, and divided into two groups based on prophylactic prescription and no prescription of antibiotics. The length of stay (LOS), hospitalization cost and outcomes were measured and compared between the two groups using statistical tests. Results: Out of the 254 patients observed, 108 were prescribed with prophylactic antibiotics and 94 were not prescribed with any antibiotic. There was a significant difference between LOS, cost of treatment and outcomes in the two groups (p < 0.001). When antibiotics were not prescribed, the odds of improvement was 1.854 times higher compared to those who received prophylactic antibiotics although after adjusting for severity of poisoning, significance was lost. On an average, 2–3 antibiotics were prescribed to every patient in the first group. Conclusion: OPP is an important health concern where issues of antibiotic misuse and overuse are practiced. Our study suggested that systemic antibiotic prophylaxis did not offer any advantage over non-use of any antibiotics in patients with OPP.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85009819015&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85009819015&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jsps.2016.07.006

DO - 10.1016/j.jsps.2016.07.006

M3 - Article

VL - 25

SP - 332

EP - 336

JO - Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal

JF - Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal

SN - 1319-0164

IS - 3

ER -