Application of piezosurgery in surgical extraction of impacted mandibular third molars versus conventional rotatory technique

A randomized controlled trial

Jyotsna Rajan, Abhay Taranath Kamath, Srikanth Gadicherla, Manish Bhagania, Kalyana Chakravarthy Pentapati

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective: To compare the effectiveness of conventional rotatory and piezosurgery technique for surgical removal of lower third molars. Material and Methods: Twenty patients with impacted lower third molars (with no acute symptoms) were divided into two groups (G1 and G2) and evaluated clinically and radiographically. They were allotted alternately into rotatory (G1) and piezotome (G2). Parameters assessed were the pain, swelling, trismus, comfort, analgesics consumed, the time taken for the procedure, intraoperative soft tissue damage and any other complications. Findings were then tabulated and analyzed. Results: Findings of pain, swelling, trismus, analgesics consumed and tissue damage were favorable in the piezosurgery group. However, the time taken for the procedure was significantly more as compared to the rotatory group. Post-operative trismus, values from the piezosurgery group were found to approach normality by day seven while in the rotatory group, a significant difference was found to exist up to day 14, suggesting that patients tend to return to normal function faster in the piezo group. Conclusion: Piezosurgery was found to be a good alternative to the conventional rotatory handpiece in select cases where extraction of the tooth could be carried out with minimal bone removal.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere4641
JournalPesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clinica Integrada
Volume19
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01-01-2019

Fingerprint

Piezosurgery
Third Molar
Trismus
Randomized Controlled Trials
Analgesics
Pain
Tooth Extraction
Bone and Bones

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Dentistry(all)

Cite this

@article{6c131996b24c487ea2e11b7e36d9835b,
title = "Application of piezosurgery in surgical extraction of impacted mandibular third molars versus conventional rotatory technique: A randomized controlled trial",
abstract = "Objective: To compare the effectiveness of conventional rotatory and piezosurgery technique for surgical removal of lower third molars. Material and Methods: Twenty patients with impacted lower third molars (with no acute symptoms) were divided into two groups (G1 and G2) and evaluated clinically and radiographically. They were allotted alternately into rotatory (G1) and piezotome (G2). Parameters assessed were the pain, swelling, trismus, comfort, analgesics consumed, the time taken for the procedure, intraoperative soft tissue damage and any other complications. Findings were then tabulated and analyzed. Results: Findings of pain, swelling, trismus, analgesics consumed and tissue damage were favorable in the piezosurgery group. However, the time taken for the procedure was significantly more as compared to the rotatory group. Post-operative trismus, values from the piezosurgery group were found to approach normality by day seven while in the rotatory group, a significant difference was found to exist up to day 14, suggesting that patients tend to return to normal function faster in the piezo group. Conclusion: Piezosurgery was found to be a good alternative to the conventional rotatory handpiece in select cases where extraction of the tooth could be carried out with minimal bone removal.",
author = "Jyotsna Rajan and Kamath, {Abhay Taranath} and Srikanth Gadicherla and Manish Bhagania and Pentapati, {Kalyana Chakravarthy}",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.4034/PBOCI.2019.191.79",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
journal = "Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clinica Integrada",
issn = "1519-0501",
publisher = "Association of Support to Oral Health Research (APESB)",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Application of piezosurgery in surgical extraction of impacted mandibular third molars versus conventional rotatory technique

T2 - A randomized controlled trial

AU - Rajan, Jyotsna

AU - Kamath, Abhay Taranath

AU - Gadicherla, Srikanth

AU - Bhagania, Manish

AU - Pentapati, Kalyana Chakravarthy

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Objective: To compare the effectiveness of conventional rotatory and piezosurgery technique for surgical removal of lower third molars. Material and Methods: Twenty patients with impacted lower third molars (with no acute symptoms) were divided into two groups (G1 and G2) and evaluated clinically and radiographically. They were allotted alternately into rotatory (G1) and piezotome (G2). Parameters assessed were the pain, swelling, trismus, comfort, analgesics consumed, the time taken for the procedure, intraoperative soft tissue damage and any other complications. Findings were then tabulated and analyzed. Results: Findings of pain, swelling, trismus, analgesics consumed and tissue damage were favorable in the piezosurgery group. However, the time taken for the procedure was significantly more as compared to the rotatory group. Post-operative trismus, values from the piezosurgery group were found to approach normality by day seven while in the rotatory group, a significant difference was found to exist up to day 14, suggesting that patients tend to return to normal function faster in the piezo group. Conclusion: Piezosurgery was found to be a good alternative to the conventional rotatory handpiece in select cases where extraction of the tooth could be carried out with minimal bone removal.

AB - Objective: To compare the effectiveness of conventional rotatory and piezosurgery technique for surgical removal of lower third molars. Material and Methods: Twenty patients with impacted lower third molars (with no acute symptoms) were divided into two groups (G1 and G2) and evaluated clinically and radiographically. They were allotted alternately into rotatory (G1) and piezotome (G2). Parameters assessed were the pain, swelling, trismus, comfort, analgesics consumed, the time taken for the procedure, intraoperative soft tissue damage and any other complications. Findings were then tabulated and analyzed. Results: Findings of pain, swelling, trismus, analgesics consumed and tissue damage were favorable in the piezosurgery group. However, the time taken for the procedure was significantly more as compared to the rotatory group. Post-operative trismus, values from the piezosurgery group were found to approach normality by day seven while in the rotatory group, a significant difference was found to exist up to day 14, suggesting that patients tend to return to normal function faster in the piezo group. Conclusion: Piezosurgery was found to be a good alternative to the conventional rotatory handpiece in select cases where extraction of the tooth could be carried out with minimal bone removal.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85066759537&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85066759537&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4034/PBOCI.2019.191.79

DO - 10.4034/PBOCI.2019.191.79

M3 - Article

VL - 19

JO - Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clinica Integrada

JF - Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clinica Integrada

SN - 1519-0501

IS - 1

M1 - e4641

ER -