Assessment for learning: A needs analysis study using formative assessment to evaluate the need for curriculum reform in basic sciences

Reem Rachel Abraham, Faith Alele, Ullas Kamath, Annamma Kurien, Kiranmai S. Rai, Indira Bairy, Mohandas K.G. Rao, Guruprasad Rao, Vasudha Devi, Yeshwant K. Rao, Tarun Sen Gupta, Bunmi S. Malau-Aduli

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

A needs analysis study for curriculum reform in basic sciences was conducted at Melaka Manipal Medical College, India, by means of a formative assessment method, namely Basic Science Retention Examination (BSRE). Students participated in a BSRE, which comprised recall and clinical multiple-choice questions in six discipline areas. They also rated the clinical relevance of each question and provided responses to three open-text questions about the exam. Pass rates were determined; clinical relevance ratings and performance scores were compared between recall type and clinical questions to test students' level of clinical application of basic science knowledge. Text comments were thematically analyzed to identify recurring themes. Only one-third of students passed the BSRE (32.2%). Students performed better in recall questions compared with clinical questions in anatomy (51.0 vs. 40.2%), pathology (45.1 vs. 38.1%), pharmacology (41.8 vs. 31.7%), and biochemistry (43.5 vs. 26.9%). In physiology, students performed better in clinical questions compared with the recall type (56.2 vs. 45.8%). Students' response to BSRE was positive. The findings imply that transfer of basic science knowledge was poor, and that assessment methods should emphasize clinical application of basic science knowledge.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)482-486
Number of pages5
JournalAdvances in Physiology Education
Volume42
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01-09-2018

Fingerprint

Curriculum
Learning
Students
Biochemistry
India
Anatomy
Pharmacology
Pathology

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Physiology

Cite this

@article{b27293e35e7b4240b5afc68515178517,
title = "Assessment for learning: A needs analysis study using formative assessment to evaluate the need for curriculum reform in basic sciences",
abstract = "A needs analysis study for curriculum reform in basic sciences was conducted at Melaka Manipal Medical College, India, by means of a formative assessment method, namely Basic Science Retention Examination (BSRE). Students participated in a BSRE, which comprised recall and clinical multiple-choice questions in six discipline areas. They also rated the clinical relevance of each question and provided responses to three open-text questions about the exam. Pass rates were determined; clinical relevance ratings and performance scores were compared between recall type and clinical questions to test students' level of clinical application of basic science knowledge. Text comments were thematically analyzed to identify recurring themes. Only one-third of students passed the BSRE (32.2{\%}). Students performed better in recall questions compared with clinical questions in anatomy (51.0 vs. 40.2{\%}), pathology (45.1 vs. 38.1{\%}), pharmacology (41.8 vs. 31.7{\%}), and biochemistry (43.5 vs. 26.9{\%}). In physiology, students performed better in clinical questions compared with the recall type (56.2 vs. 45.8{\%}). Students' response to BSRE was positive. The findings imply that transfer of basic science knowledge was poor, and that assessment methods should emphasize clinical application of basic science knowledge.",
author = "Abraham, {Reem Rachel} and Faith Alele and Ullas Kamath and Annamma Kurien and Rai, {Kiranmai S.} and Indira Bairy and Rao, {Mohandas K.G.} and Guruprasad Rao and Vasudha Devi and Rao, {Yeshwant K.} and Gupta, {Tarun Sen} and Malau-Aduli, {Bunmi S.}",
year = "2018",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1152/advan.00093.2018",
language = "English",
volume = "42",
pages = "482--486",
journal = "American Journal of Physiology - Advances in Physiology Education",
issn = "1043-4046",
publisher = "American Physiological Society",
number = "3",

}

Assessment for learning : A needs analysis study using formative assessment to evaluate the need for curriculum reform in basic sciences. / Abraham, Reem Rachel; Alele, Faith; Kamath, Ullas; Kurien, Annamma; Rai, Kiranmai S.; Bairy, Indira; Rao, Mohandas K.G.; Rao, Guruprasad; Devi, Vasudha; Rao, Yeshwant K.; Gupta, Tarun Sen; Malau-Aduli, Bunmi S.

In: Advances in Physiology Education, Vol. 42, No. 3, 01.09.2018, p. 482-486.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assessment for learning

T2 - A needs analysis study using formative assessment to evaluate the need for curriculum reform in basic sciences

AU - Abraham, Reem Rachel

AU - Alele, Faith

AU - Kamath, Ullas

AU - Kurien, Annamma

AU - Rai, Kiranmai S.

AU - Bairy, Indira

AU - Rao, Mohandas K.G.

AU - Rao, Guruprasad

AU - Devi, Vasudha

AU - Rao, Yeshwant K.

AU - Gupta, Tarun Sen

AU - Malau-Aduli, Bunmi S.

PY - 2018/9/1

Y1 - 2018/9/1

N2 - A needs analysis study for curriculum reform in basic sciences was conducted at Melaka Manipal Medical College, India, by means of a formative assessment method, namely Basic Science Retention Examination (BSRE). Students participated in a BSRE, which comprised recall and clinical multiple-choice questions in six discipline areas. They also rated the clinical relevance of each question and provided responses to three open-text questions about the exam. Pass rates were determined; clinical relevance ratings and performance scores were compared between recall type and clinical questions to test students' level of clinical application of basic science knowledge. Text comments were thematically analyzed to identify recurring themes. Only one-third of students passed the BSRE (32.2%). Students performed better in recall questions compared with clinical questions in anatomy (51.0 vs. 40.2%), pathology (45.1 vs. 38.1%), pharmacology (41.8 vs. 31.7%), and biochemistry (43.5 vs. 26.9%). In physiology, students performed better in clinical questions compared with the recall type (56.2 vs. 45.8%). Students' response to BSRE was positive. The findings imply that transfer of basic science knowledge was poor, and that assessment methods should emphasize clinical application of basic science knowledge.

AB - A needs analysis study for curriculum reform in basic sciences was conducted at Melaka Manipal Medical College, India, by means of a formative assessment method, namely Basic Science Retention Examination (BSRE). Students participated in a BSRE, which comprised recall and clinical multiple-choice questions in six discipline areas. They also rated the clinical relevance of each question and provided responses to three open-text questions about the exam. Pass rates were determined; clinical relevance ratings and performance scores were compared between recall type and clinical questions to test students' level of clinical application of basic science knowledge. Text comments were thematically analyzed to identify recurring themes. Only one-third of students passed the BSRE (32.2%). Students performed better in recall questions compared with clinical questions in anatomy (51.0 vs. 40.2%), pathology (45.1 vs. 38.1%), pharmacology (41.8 vs. 31.7%), and biochemistry (43.5 vs. 26.9%). In physiology, students performed better in clinical questions compared with the recall type (56.2 vs. 45.8%). Students' response to BSRE was positive. The findings imply that transfer of basic science knowledge was poor, and that assessment methods should emphasize clinical application of basic science knowledge.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85052646066&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85052646066&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1152/advan.00093.2018

DO - 10.1152/advan.00093.2018

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85052646066

VL - 42

SP - 482

EP - 486

JO - American Journal of Physiology - Advances in Physiology Education

JF - American Journal of Physiology - Advances in Physiology Education

SN - 1043-4046

IS - 3

ER -