Bacterial and clinical profile of diabetic foot patients

Sageera Banoo, D. S. Shubha, V. Shashidhar, D. Venkatesha

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background and Objective: Diabetic foot ulceration is a multifactorial process involving various intrinsic complications of diabetes mellitus which cause injury to the foot at risk. The diabetic foot ulcer infections are polymicrobial in nature. Failure to recognize and control of the infectious process may have devastating consequences of limb amputation, sepsis, and mortality. Hence, the study was undertaken to determine the bacterial and clinical profile of diabetic foot ulcer using optimal culture techniques and the antimicrobial sensitivity pattern of the isolates. Materials and Methods: A total of 100 patients with diabetic foot ulcer of Wagner′s grade I and above were included in the study. Pus and tissue biopsy were collected for bacteriological study. The specimen was processed in the microbiology laboratory for Gram stain, aerobic culture, and anaerobic culture. The organisms isolated were identified by standard procedures and antimicrobial susceptibility was done by Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method. Results: A total of 187 organisms were isolated, with an average of 1.87 organisms per specimen. Pseudomonas sp, 36 (21.9%), was the most common aerobic organisms isolated followed by Klebsiella sp, 32 (19.4%). Anaerobic organisms isolated were 22 (11.77%). The predominant anaerobic organisms isolated were Peptostreptococcus sp, 10 (45.5%). All the aerobic Gram-negative organisms were sensitive to imipenem (100%). Gram-positive organism was 100% sensitive to vancomycin. Methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) was seen in 66.7%. All the anaerobes were sensitive to metronidazole, clindamycin, cefoxitin, and penicillin G. Conclusion: Pseudomonas was the most common organism isolated in our study. MRSA was seen in 66.7% of the isolate.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)69-73
Number of pages5
JournalAnnals of Tropical Medicine and Public Health
Volume5
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01-03-2012

Fingerprint

Diabetic Foot
Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus
Pseudomonas
Disk Diffusion Antimicrobial Tests
Foot Injuries
Peptostreptococcus
Cefoxitin
Culture Techniques
Penicillin G
Klebsiella
Suppuration
Clindamycin
Imipenem
Metronidazole
Diabetes Complications
Vancomycin
Microbiology
Coinfection
Amputation
Sepsis

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Medicine(all)
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Banoo, Sageera ; Shubha, D. S. ; Shashidhar, V. ; Venkatesha, D. / Bacterial and clinical profile of diabetic foot patients. In: Annals of Tropical Medicine and Public Health. 2012 ; Vol. 5, No. 2. pp. 69-73.
@article{362c4f8032dc44f289af59afd2c5fec5,
title = "Bacterial and clinical profile of diabetic foot patients",
abstract = "Background and Objective: Diabetic foot ulceration is a multifactorial process involving various intrinsic complications of diabetes mellitus which cause injury to the foot at risk. The diabetic foot ulcer infections are polymicrobial in nature. Failure to recognize and control of the infectious process may have devastating consequences of limb amputation, sepsis, and mortality. Hence, the study was undertaken to determine the bacterial and clinical profile of diabetic foot ulcer using optimal culture techniques and the antimicrobial sensitivity pattern of the isolates. Materials and Methods: A total of 100 patients with diabetic foot ulcer of Wagner′s grade I and above were included in the study. Pus and tissue biopsy were collected for bacteriological study. The specimen was processed in the microbiology laboratory for Gram stain, aerobic culture, and anaerobic culture. The organisms isolated were identified by standard procedures and antimicrobial susceptibility was done by Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method. Results: A total of 187 organisms were isolated, with an average of 1.87 organisms per specimen. Pseudomonas sp, 36 (21.9{\%}), was the most common aerobic organisms isolated followed by Klebsiella sp, 32 (19.4{\%}). Anaerobic organisms isolated were 22 (11.77{\%}). The predominant anaerobic organisms isolated were Peptostreptococcus sp, 10 (45.5{\%}). All the aerobic Gram-negative organisms were sensitive to imipenem (100{\%}). Gram-positive organism was 100{\%} sensitive to vancomycin. Methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) was seen in 66.7{\%}. All the anaerobes were sensitive to metronidazole, clindamycin, cefoxitin, and penicillin G. Conclusion: Pseudomonas was the most common organism isolated in our study. MRSA was seen in 66.7{\%} of the isolate.",
author = "Sageera Banoo and Shubha, {D. S.} and V. Shashidhar and D. Venkatesha",
year = "2012",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.4103/1755-6783.95952",
language = "English",
volume = "5",
pages = "69--73",
journal = "Annals of Tropical Medicine and Public Health",
issn = "1755-6783",
publisher = "Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd",
number = "2",

}

Bacterial and clinical profile of diabetic foot patients. / Banoo, Sageera; Shubha, D. S.; Shashidhar, V.; Venkatesha, D.

In: Annals of Tropical Medicine and Public Health, Vol. 5, No. 2, 01.03.2012, p. 69-73.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Bacterial and clinical profile of diabetic foot patients

AU - Banoo, Sageera

AU - Shubha, D. S.

AU - Shashidhar, V.

AU - Venkatesha, D.

PY - 2012/3/1

Y1 - 2012/3/1

N2 - Background and Objective: Diabetic foot ulceration is a multifactorial process involving various intrinsic complications of diabetes mellitus which cause injury to the foot at risk. The diabetic foot ulcer infections are polymicrobial in nature. Failure to recognize and control of the infectious process may have devastating consequences of limb amputation, sepsis, and mortality. Hence, the study was undertaken to determine the bacterial and clinical profile of diabetic foot ulcer using optimal culture techniques and the antimicrobial sensitivity pattern of the isolates. Materials and Methods: A total of 100 patients with diabetic foot ulcer of Wagner′s grade I and above were included in the study. Pus and tissue biopsy were collected for bacteriological study. The specimen was processed in the microbiology laboratory for Gram stain, aerobic culture, and anaerobic culture. The organisms isolated were identified by standard procedures and antimicrobial susceptibility was done by Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method. Results: A total of 187 organisms were isolated, with an average of 1.87 organisms per specimen. Pseudomonas sp, 36 (21.9%), was the most common aerobic organisms isolated followed by Klebsiella sp, 32 (19.4%). Anaerobic organisms isolated were 22 (11.77%). The predominant anaerobic organisms isolated were Peptostreptococcus sp, 10 (45.5%). All the aerobic Gram-negative organisms were sensitive to imipenem (100%). Gram-positive organism was 100% sensitive to vancomycin. Methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) was seen in 66.7%. All the anaerobes were sensitive to metronidazole, clindamycin, cefoxitin, and penicillin G. Conclusion: Pseudomonas was the most common organism isolated in our study. MRSA was seen in 66.7% of the isolate.

AB - Background and Objective: Diabetic foot ulceration is a multifactorial process involving various intrinsic complications of diabetes mellitus which cause injury to the foot at risk. The diabetic foot ulcer infections are polymicrobial in nature. Failure to recognize and control of the infectious process may have devastating consequences of limb amputation, sepsis, and mortality. Hence, the study was undertaken to determine the bacterial and clinical profile of diabetic foot ulcer using optimal culture techniques and the antimicrobial sensitivity pattern of the isolates. Materials and Methods: A total of 100 patients with diabetic foot ulcer of Wagner′s grade I and above were included in the study. Pus and tissue biopsy were collected for bacteriological study. The specimen was processed in the microbiology laboratory for Gram stain, aerobic culture, and anaerobic culture. The organisms isolated were identified by standard procedures and antimicrobial susceptibility was done by Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method. Results: A total of 187 organisms were isolated, with an average of 1.87 organisms per specimen. Pseudomonas sp, 36 (21.9%), was the most common aerobic organisms isolated followed by Klebsiella sp, 32 (19.4%). Anaerobic organisms isolated were 22 (11.77%). The predominant anaerobic organisms isolated were Peptostreptococcus sp, 10 (45.5%). All the aerobic Gram-negative organisms were sensitive to imipenem (100%). Gram-positive organism was 100% sensitive to vancomycin. Methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) was seen in 66.7%. All the anaerobes were sensitive to metronidazole, clindamycin, cefoxitin, and penicillin G. Conclusion: Pseudomonas was the most common organism isolated in our study. MRSA was seen in 66.7% of the isolate.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84861304253&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84861304253&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4103/1755-6783.95952

DO - 10.4103/1755-6783.95952

M3 - Article

VL - 5

SP - 69

EP - 73

JO - Annals of Tropical Medicine and Public Health

JF - Annals of Tropical Medicine and Public Health

SN - 1755-6783

IS - 2

ER -