Bladder adenocarcinoma: A persisting diagnostic dilemma

Geetha Vasudevan, Arijit Bishnu, Brij Mohan Kumar Singh, M. Deepak Nayak, Pooja Jain

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Primary urinary Bladder Adenocarcinoma (PBA) is an uncommon neoplasm and can cause diagnostic difficulties due to histologic similarities with adenocarcinomas of adjacent structures like Gastrointestinal Tract (GIT) and prostate, since involvement of the bladder by metastasis or direct spread can occur. Seven cases of bladder adenocarcinomas were diagnosed during a period of four years in a tertiary care hospital. Patient’s age ranged from 26-78 years with a male predilection. Three cases were signet ring type adenocarcinomas, two cases were subtyped as enteric variant, one as mucinous variant and one as adenocarcinoma Not Otherwise Specified (NOS) variant. One case showed urachal involvement. Common site of involvement was the base and posterior wall of the bladder. Three cases had prior history of GIT malignancy. No morphologic difference was identified to differentiate primary from secondary adenocarcinomas. Bladder adenocarcinoma is rare tumours. Primary and secondary adenocarcinomas cannot be distinguished from each other on morphologic grounds. Ancillary studies may have limited role in distinguishing between the two. Hence, clinical correlation has a major role in their evaluation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)ER01-ER04
JournalJournal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
Volume11
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01-03-2017

Fingerprint

Tumors
Urinary Bladder
Adenocarcinoma
Gastrointestinal Tract
Neoplasms
Tertiary Healthcare
Tertiary Care Centers
Prostate
Neoplasm Metastasis

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Clinical Biochemistry

Cite this

Vasudevan, G., Bishnu, A., Singh, B. M. K., Nayak, M. D., & Jain, P. (2017). Bladder adenocarcinoma: A persisting diagnostic dilemma. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, 11(3), ER01-ER04. https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2017/24590.9536
Vasudevan, Geetha ; Bishnu, Arijit ; Singh, Brij Mohan Kumar ; Nayak, M. Deepak ; Jain, Pooja. / Bladder adenocarcinoma : A persisting diagnostic dilemma. In: Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. 2017 ; Vol. 11, No. 3. pp. ER01-ER04.
@article{c8ca2502f18c4893a32419748c963457,
title = "Bladder adenocarcinoma: A persisting diagnostic dilemma",
abstract = "Primary urinary Bladder Adenocarcinoma (PBA) is an uncommon neoplasm and can cause diagnostic difficulties due to histologic similarities with adenocarcinomas of adjacent structures like Gastrointestinal Tract (GIT) and prostate, since involvement of the bladder by metastasis or direct spread can occur. Seven cases of bladder adenocarcinomas were diagnosed during a period of four years in a tertiary care hospital. Patient’s age ranged from 26-78 years with a male predilection. Three cases were signet ring type adenocarcinomas, two cases were subtyped as enteric variant, one as mucinous variant and one as adenocarcinoma Not Otherwise Specified (NOS) variant. One case showed urachal involvement. Common site of involvement was the base and posterior wall of the bladder. Three cases had prior history of GIT malignancy. No morphologic difference was identified to differentiate primary from secondary adenocarcinomas. Bladder adenocarcinoma is rare tumours. Primary and secondary adenocarcinomas cannot be distinguished from each other on morphologic grounds. Ancillary studies may have limited role in distinguishing between the two. Hence, clinical correlation has a major role in their evaluation.",
author = "Geetha Vasudevan and Arijit Bishnu and Singh, {Brij Mohan Kumar} and Nayak, {M. Deepak} and Pooja Jain",
year = "2017",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.7860/JCDR/2017/24590.9536",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
pages = "ER01--ER04",
journal = "Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research",
issn = "2249-782X",
publisher = "Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research",
number = "3",

}

Vasudevan, G, Bishnu, A, Singh, BMK, Nayak, MD & Jain, P 2017, 'Bladder adenocarcinoma: A persisting diagnostic dilemma', Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. ER01-ER04. https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2017/24590.9536

Bladder adenocarcinoma : A persisting diagnostic dilemma. / Vasudevan, Geetha; Bishnu, Arijit; Singh, Brij Mohan Kumar; Nayak, M. Deepak; Jain, Pooja.

In: Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, Vol. 11, No. 3, 01.03.2017, p. ER01-ER04.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Bladder adenocarcinoma

T2 - A persisting diagnostic dilemma

AU - Vasudevan, Geetha

AU - Bishnu, Arijit

AU - Singh, Brij Mohan Kumar

AU - Nayak, M. Deepak

AU - Jain, Pooja

PY - 2017/3/1

Y1 - 2017/3/1

N2 - Primary urinary Bladder Adenocarcinoma (PBA) is an uncommon neoplasm and can cause diagnostic difficulties due to histologic similarities with adenocarcinomas of adjacent structures like Gastrointestinal Tract (GIT) and prostate, since involvement of the bladder by metastasis or direct spread can occur. Seven cases of bladder adenocarcinomas were diagnosed during a period of four years in a tertiary care hospital. Patient’s age ranged from 26-78 years with a male predilection. Three cases were signet ring type adenocarcinomas, two cases were subtyped as enteric variant, one as mucinous variant and one as adenocarcinoma Not Otherwise Specified (NOS) variant. One case showed urachal involvement. Common site of involvement was the base and posterior wall of the bladder. Three cases had prior history of GIT malignancy. No morphologic difference was identified to differentiate primary from secondary adenocarcinomas. Bladder adenocarcinoma is rare tumours. Primary and secondary adenocarcinomas cannot be distinguished from each other on morphologic grounds. Ancillary studies may have limited role in distinguishing between the two. Hence, clinical correlation has a major role in their evaluation.

AB - Primary urinary Bladder Adenocarcinoma (PBA) is an uncommon neoplasm and can cause diagnostic difficulties due to histologic similarities with adenocarcinomas of adjacent structures like Gastrointestinal Tract (GIT) and prostate, since involvement of the bladder by metastasis or direct spread can occur. Seven cases of bladder adenocarcinomas were diagnosed during a period of four years in a tertiary care hospital. Patient’s age ranged from 26-78 years with a male predilection. Three cases were signet ring type adenocarcinomas, two cases were subtyped as enteric variant, one as mucinous variant and one as adenocarcinoma Not Otherwise Specified (NOS) variant. One case showed urachal involvement. Common site of involvement was the base and posterior wall of the bladder. Three cases had prior history of GIT malignancy. No morphologic difference was identified to differentiate primary from secondary adenocarcinomas. Bladder adenocarcinoma is rare tumours. Primary and secondary adenocarcinomas cannot be distinguished from each other on morphologic grounds. Ancillary studies may have limited role in distinguishing between the two. Hence, clinical correlation has a major role in their evaluation.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85014314258&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85014314258&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.7860/JCDR/2017/24590.9536

DO - 10.7860/JCDR/2017/24590.9536

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85014314258

VL - 11

SP - ER01-ER04

JO - Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research

JF - Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research

SN - 2249-782X

IS - 3

ER -