Clinical and structural outcomes after arthroscopic repair of medium-to massive-sized delaminated and nondelaminated rotator cuff tears

Vivek Pandey, C. Joseph, Naveen Mathai, Kiran Acharya, Lakshmikanth Karegowda, W. Willems

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Introduction: Current evidence is controversial about the outcomes after the repair of the delaminated versus nondelaminated rotator cuff tears. The objective of this study was to evaluate the factors affecting delamination of the cuff and clinical and structural outcomes after en masse arthroscopic repair of delaminated versus nondelaminated cuff of varying sizes. Materials and Methods: A total of 233 patients with full-thickness posterosuperior cuff tears were divided in two groups: Group 1: Delaminated tears (n = 131) and Group 2: Nondelaminated tears (n = 102) of medium, large, and massive sizes. Both groups were evaluated by clinical scores (Constant-Murley [CM], American shoulder and elbow score [ASES]) and ultrasonography (USG), at a minimum followup of 2 years. Results: The mean followup was 45.47 months. There was a weak but statistically significant linear correlation (P = 0.02) between the increasing size of tear and delamination, whereas increasing age and duration of symptoms did not correlate with increasing tendency of delamination. Final followup USG analysis revealed that there was no significant difference (P = 0.55) between healing rates of Group 1 and Group 2. Further taking various tear sizes into account, USG revealed no significant difference between the healing rates of two groups. The mean overall final postoperative CM and ASES scores of two groups did not show any significant difference (CM; P = 0.36, ASES; P = 0.4). However, the clinical outcome was significantly better in the completely healed group as compared to partially healed or retear group. Conclusions: A weak linear correlation between delamination and increasing size of the tear was noted. Although overall structural and clinical outcome is no different between two groups, the clinical outcomes of completely healed tear are better than partially healed ones.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)384-391
Number of pages8
JournalIndian Journal of Orthopaedics
Volume53
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01-05-2019

Fingerprint

Tears
Elbow
Ultrasonography
Rotator Cuff Injuries

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

@article{dfc2499aaad84ff1afd81c5d1f0392e0,
title = "Clinical and structural outcomes after arthroscopic repair of medium-to massive-sized delaminated and nondelaminated rotator cuff tears",
abstract = "Introduction: Current evidence is controversial about the outcomes after the repair of the delaminated versus nondelaminated rotator cuff tears. The objective of this study was to evaluate the factors affecting delamination of the cuff and clinical and structural outcomes after en masse arthroscopic repair of delaminated versus nondelaminated cuff of varying sizes. Materials and Methods: A total of 233 patients with full-thickness posterosuperior cuff tears were divided in two groups: Group 1: Delaminated tears (n = 131) and Group 2: Nondelaminated tears (n = 102) of medium, large, and massive sizes. Both groups were evaluated by clinical scores (Constant-Murley [CM], American shoulder and elbow score [ASES]) and ultrasonography (USG), at a minimum followup of 2 years. Results: The mean followup was 45.47 months. There was a weak but statistically significant linear correlation (P = 0.02) between the increasing size of tear and delamination, whereas increasing age and duration of symptoms did not correlate with increasing tendency of delamination. Final followup USG analysis revealed that there was no significant difference (P = 0.55) between healing rates of Group 1 and Group 2. Further taking various tear sizes into account, USG revealed no significant difference between the healing rates of two groups. The mean overall final postoperative CM and ASES scores of two groups did not show any significant difference (CM; P = 0.36, ASES; P = 0.4). However, the clinical outcome was significantly better in the completely healed group as compared to partially healed or retear group. Conclusions: A weak linear correlation between delamination and increasing size of the tear was noted. Although overall structural and clinical outcome is no different between two groups, the clinical outcomes of completely healed tear are better than partially healed ones.",
author = "Vivek Pandey and C. Joseph and Naveen Mathai and Kiran Acharya and Lakshmikanth Karegowda and W. Willems",
year = "2019",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.4103/ortho.IJOrtho_440_18",
language = "English",
volume = "53",
pages = "384--391",
journal = "Indian Journal of Orthopaedics",
issn = "0019-5413",
publisher = "Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd",
number = "3",

}

Clinical and structural outcomes after arthroscopic repair of medium-to massive-sized delaminated and nondelaminated rotator cuff tears. / Pandey, Vivek; Joseph, C.; Mathai, Naveen; Acharya, Kiran; Karegowda, Lakshmikanth; Willems, W.

In: Indian Journal of Orthopaedics, Vol. 53, No. 3, 01.05.2019, p. 384-391.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Clinical and structural outcomes after arthroscopic repair of medium-to massive-sized delaminated and nondelaminated rotator cuff tears

AU - Pandey, Vivek

AU - Joseph, C.

AU - Mathai, Naveen

AU - Acharya, Kiran

AU - Karegowda, Lakshmikanth

AU - Willems, W.

PY - 2019/5/1

Y1 - 2019/5/1

N2 - Introduction: Current evidence is controversial about the outcomes after the repair of the delaminated versus nondelaminated rotator cuff tears. The objective of this study was to evaluate the factors affecting delamination of the cuff and clinical and structural outcomes after en masse arthroscopic repair of delaminated versus nondelaminated cuff of varying sizes. Materials and Methods: A total of 233 patients with full-thickness posterosuperior cuff tears were divided in two groups: Group 1: Delaminated tears (n = 131) and Group 2: Nondelaminated tears (n = 102) of medium, large, and massive sizes. Both groups were evaluated by clinical scores (Constant-Murley [CM], American shoulder and elbow score [ASES]) and ultrasonography (USG), at a minimum followup of 2 years. Results: The mean followup was 45.47 months. There was a weak but statistically significant linear correlation (P = 0.02) between the increasing size of tear and delamination, whereas increasing age and duration of symptoms did not correlate with increasing tendency of delamination. Final followup USG analysis revealed that there was no significant difference (P = 0.55) between healing rates of Group 1 and Group 2. Further taking various tear sizes into account, USG revealed no significant difference between the healing rates of two groups. The mean overall final postoperative CM and ASES scores of two groups did not show any significant difference (CM; P = 0.36, ASES; P = 0.4). However, the clinical outcome was significantly better in the completely healed group as compared to partially healed or retear group. Conclusions: A weak linear correlation between delamination and increasing size of the tear was noted. Although overall structural and clinical outcome is no different between two groups, the clinical outcomes of completely healed tear are better than partially healed ones.

AB - Introduction: Current evidence is controversial about the outcomes after the repair of the delaminated versus nondelaminated rotator cuff tears. The objective of this study was to evaluate the factors affecting delamination of the cuff and clinical and structural outcomes after en masse arthroscopic repair of delaminated versus nondelaminated cuff of varying sizes. Materials and Methods: A total of 233 patients with full-thickness posterosuperior cuff tears were divided in two groups: Group 1: Delaminated tears (n = 131) and Group 2: Nondelaminated tears (n = 102) of medium, large, and massive sizes. Both groups were evaluated by clinical scores (Constant-Murley [CM], American shoulder and elbow score [ASES]) and ultrasonography (USG), at a minimum followup of 2 years. Results: The mean followup was 45.47 months. There was a weak but statistically significant linear correlation (P = 0.02) between the increasing size of tear and delamination, whereas increasing age and duration of symptoms did not correlate with increasing tendency of delamination. Final followup USG analysis revealed that there was no significant difference (P = 0.55) between healing rates of Group 1 and Group 2. Further taking various tear sizes into account, USG revealed no significant difference between the healing rates of two groups. The mean overall final postoperative CM and ASES scores of two groups did not show any significant difference (CM; P = 0.36, ASES; P = 0.4). However, the clinical outcome was significantly better in the completely healed group as compared to partially healed or retear group. Conclusions: A weak linear correlation between delamination and increasing size of the tear was noted. Although overall structural and clinical outcome is no different between two groups, the clinical outcomes of completely healed tear are better than partially healed ones.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85065228935&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85065228935&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4103/ortho.IJOrtho_440_18

DO - 10.4103/ortho.IJOrtho_440_18

M3 - Article

VL - 53

SP - 384

EP - 391

JO - Indian Journal of Orthopaedics

JF - Indian Journal of Orthopaedics

SN - 0019-5413

IS - 3

ER -