Clinical profile of urinary tract infections in diabetics and non-diabetics

M. Aswani Srinivas, U. K. Chandrashekar, K. N. Shivashankara, B. C. Pruthvi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

26 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background The risk of urinary tract infection (UTI) is higher in diabetics compared to non-diabetics. The aetiology and the antibiotic resistance of uropathogens have been changing over the past years. Hence the study was undertaken to determine if there are differences in clinical and microbiological features of UTI between diabetic and non-diabetic subjects, to study the influence of diabetes mellitus on the uropathogens and antibiotic sensitivity pattern in patients with UTI. Method A total of 181 diabetics (83 males and 98 females) and 124 non-diabetic subjects (52 males and 72 females) with culture positive UTI were studied. Patients with negative urine culture (n= 64), those diagnosed and treated outside (n= 83) and not willing to participate in the study (n= 24) were excluded. Results Almost 30 per cent of the patients (both diabetics and nondiabetics) presented with asymptomatic bacteriuria and the prevalence of pyelonephritis was significantly higher (p= 0.04) in diabetics compared to non-diabetic patients. The majority of the diabetics with UTI (87.14 per cent) had glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c) > 6.5 per cent with p < 0.001. The isolation rate of Escherichia coli (E. coli) from urine culture was higher (64.6 per cent) among diabetic patients followed by Klebsiella (12.1 per cent) and Enterococcus (9.9 per cent). The prevalence of extendedspectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) producing E.coli was significantly higher in diabetics (p= 0.001) compared to nondiabetics. E.coli showed maximum sensitivity to carbapenems in both diabetic and non-diabetic subjects and least susceptibility to ampicillin. Conclusion The prevalence of pyelonephritis is significantly higher in diabetics than in non-diabetic subjects, with E. coli being the most common isolate. Elevated glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) predisposes diabetics to UTI. Investigation of bacteriuria in diabetic patients for urinary tract infection is important for treatment and prevention of renal complications.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)29-34
Number of pages6
JournalAustralasian Medical Journal
Volume7
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 05-02-2014

Fingerprint

Urinary Tract Infections
Escherichia coli
Bacteriuria
Pyelonephritis
Glycosylated Hemoglobin A
Urine
Carbapenems
Klebsiella
Enterococcus
Ampicillin
beta-Lactamases
Microbial Drug Resistance
Diabetes Mellitus
Anti-Bacterial Agents
Kidney

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Aswani Srinivas, M. ; Chandrashekar, U. K. ; Shivashankara, K. N. ; Pruthvi, B. C. / Clinical profile of urinary tract infections in diabetics and non-diabetics. In: Australasian Medical Journal. 2014 ; Vol. 7, No. 1. pp. 29-34.
@article{07c5bb64f533440fb1e669b50d22feb2,
title = "Clinical profile of urinary tract infections in diabetics and non-diabetics",
abstract = "Background The risk of urinary tract infection (UTI) is higher in diabetics compared to non-diabetics. The aetiology and the antibiotic resistance of uropathogens have been changing over the past years. Hence the study was undertaken to determine if there are differences in clinical and microbiological features of UTI between diabetic and non-diabetic subjects, to study the influence of diabetes mellitus on the uropathogens and antibiotic sensitivity pattern in patients with UTI. Method A total of 181 diabetics (83 males and 98 females) and 124 non-diabetic subjects (52 males and 72 females) with culture positive UTI were studied. Patients with negative urine culture (n= 64), those diagnosed and treated outside (n= 83) and not willing to participate in the study (n= 24) were excluded. Results Almost 30 per cent of the patients (both diabetics and nondiabetics) presented with asymptomatic bacteriuria and the prevalence of pyelonephritis was significantly higher (p= 0.04) in diabetics compared to non-diabetic patients. The majority of the diabetics with UTI (87.14 per cent) had glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c) > 6.5 per cent with p < 0.001. The isolation rate of Escherichia coli (E. coli) from urine culture was higher (64.6 per cent) among diabetic patients followed by Klebsiella (12.1 per cent) and Enterococcus (9.9 per cent). The prevalence of extendedspectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) producing E.coli was significantly higher in diabetics (p= 0.001) compared to nondiabetics. E.coli showed maximum sensitivity to carbapenems in both diabetic and non-diabetic subjects and least susceptibility to ampicillin. Conclusion The prevalence of pyelonephritis is significantly higher in diabetics than in non-diabetic subjects, with E. coli being the most common isolate. Elevated glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) predisposes diabetics to UTI. Investigation of bacteriuria in diabetic patients for urinary tract infection is important for treatment and prevention of renal complications.",
author = "{Aswani Srinivas}, M. and Chandrashekar, {U. K.} and Shivashankara, {K. N.} and Pruthvi, {B. C.}",
year = "2014",
month = "2",
day = "5",
doi = "10.4066/AMJ.2014.1906",
language = "English",
volume = "7",
pages = "29--34",
journal = "Australasian Medical Journal",
issn = "1836-1935",
publisher = "The Australasian Medical Journal Pty. Ltd.",
number = "1",

}

Clinical profile of urinary tract infections in diabetics and non-diabetics. / Aswani Srinivas, M.; Chandrashekar, U. K.; Shivashankara, K. N.; Pruthvi, B. C.

In: Australasian Medical Journal, Vol. 7, No. 1, 05.02.2014, p. 29-34.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Clinical profile of urinary tract infections in diabetics and non-diabetics

AU - Aswani Srinivas, M.

AU - Chandrashekar, U. K.

AU - Shivashankara, K. N.

AU - Pruthvi, B. C.

PY - 2014/2/5

Y1 - 2014/2/5

N2 - Background The risk of urinary tract infection (UTI) is higher in diabetics compared to non-diabetics. The aetiology and the antibiotic resistance of uropathogens have been changing over the past years. Hence the study was undertaken to determine if there are differences in clinical and microbiological features of UTI between diabetic and non-diabetic subjects, to study the influence of diabetes mellitus on the uropathogens and antibiotic sensitivity pattern in patients with UTI. Method A total of 181 diabetics (83 males and 98 females) and 124 non-diabetic subjects (52 males and 72 females) with culture positive UTI were studied. Patients with negative urine culture (n= 64), those diagnosed and treated outside (n= 83) and not willing to participate in the study (n= 24) were excluded. Results Almost 30 per cent of the patients (both diabetics and nondiabetics) presented with asymptomatic bacteriuria and the prevalence of pyelonephritis was significantly higher (p= 0.04) in diabetics compared to non-diabetic patients. The majority of the diabetics with UTI (87.14 per cent) had glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c) > 6.5 per cent with p < 0.001. The isolation rate of Escherichia coli (E. coli) from urine culture was higher (64.6 per cent) among diabetic patients followed by Klebsiella (12.1 per cent) and Enterococcus (9.9 per cent). The prevalence of extendedspectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) producing E.coli was significantly higher in diabetics (p= 0.001) compared to nondiabetics. E.coli showed maximum sensitivity to carbapenems in both diabetic and non-diabetic subjects and least susceptibility to ampicillin. Conclusion The prevalence of pyelonephritis is significantly higher in diabetics than in non-diabetic subjects, with E. coli being the most common isolate. Elevated glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) predisposes diabetics to UTI. Investigation of bacteriuria in diabetic patients for urinary tract infection is important for treatment and prevention of renal complications.

AB - Background The risk of urinary tract infection (UTI) is higher in diabetics compared to non-diabetics. The aetiology and the antibiotic resistance of uropathogens have been changing over the past years. Hence the study was undertaken to determine if there are differences in clinical and microbiological features of UTI between diabetic and non-diabetic subjects, to study the influence of diabetes mellitus on the uropathogens and antibiotic sensitivity pattern in patients with UTI. Method A total of 181 diabetics (83 males and 98 females) and 124 non-diabetic subjects (52 males and 72 females) with culture positive UTI were studied. Patients with negative urine culture (n= 64), those diagnosed and treated outside (n= 83) and not willing to participate in the study (n= 24) were excluded. Results Almost 30 per cent of the patients (both diabetics and nondiabetics) presented with asymptomatic bacteriuria and the prevalence of pyelonephritis was significantly higher (p= 0.04) in diabetics compared to non-diabetic patients. The majority of the diabetics with UTI (87.14 per cent) had glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c) > 6.5 per cent with p < 0.001. The isolation rate of Escherichia coli (E. coli) from urine culture was higher (64.6 per cent) among diabetic patients followed by Klebsiella (12.1 per cent) and Enterococcus (9.9 per cent). The prevalence of extendedspectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) producing E.coli was significantly higher in diabetics (p= 0.001) compared to nondiabetics. E.coli showed maximum sensitivity to carbapenems in both diabetic and non-diabetic subjects and least susceptibility to ampicillin. Conclusion The prevalence of pyelonephritis is significantly higher in diabetics than in non-diabetic subjects, with E. coli being the most common isolate. Elevated glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) predisposes diabetics to UTI. Investigation of bacteriuria in diabetic patients for urinary tract infection is important for treatment and prevention of renal complications.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84893354626&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84893354626&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4066/AMJ.2014.1906

DO - 10.4066/AMJ.2014.1906

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84893354626

VL - 7

SP - 29

EP - 34

JO - Australasian Medical Journal

JF - Australasian Medical Journal

SN - 1836-1935

IS - 1

ER -