Communicating genetics and smoking through social media

Are we there yet?

Sylviane De Viron, Suzanne L. Suggs, Angela Brand, Herman Van Oyen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Social media is a recent source of health information that could disseminate new scientific research, such as the genetics of smoking. Objective: The objectives were (1) to evaluate the availability of genetic information about smoking on different social media platforms (ie, YouTube, Facebook, and Twitter) and (2) to assess the type and the content of the information displayed on the social media as well as the profile of people publishing this information. Methods: We screened posts on YouTube, Facebook, and Twitter with the terms "smoking" and "genetic" at two time points (September 18, 2012, and May 7, 2013). The first 100 posts were reviewed for each media for the time points. Google was searched during Time 2 as an indicator of available information on the Web and the other social media that discussed genetics and smoking. The source of information, the country of the publisher, characteristics of the posts, and content of the posts were extracted. Results: On YouTube, Facebook, and Twitter, 31, 0, and 84 posts, respectively, were included. Posts were mostly based on smoking-related diseases, referred to scientific publications, and were largely from the United States. From the Google search, most results were scientific databases. Six scientific publications referred to within the Google search were also retrieved on either YouTube or Twitter. Conclusions: Despite the importance of public understanding of smoking and genetics, and the high use of social media, little information on this topic is actually present on social media. Therefore, there is a need to monitor the information that is there and to evaluate the population's understanding of the information related to genetics and smoking that is displayed on social media.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere198
JournalJournal of Medical Internet Research
Volume15
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 09-2013

Fingerprint

Social Media
Smoking
Publications
Databases
Health
Research

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Health Informatics

Cite this

Viron, Sylviane De ; Suggs, Suzanne L. ; Brand, Angela ; Oyen, Herman Van. / Communicating genetics and smoking through social media : Are we there yet?. In: Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2013 ; Vol. 15, No. 9.
@article{f3fa9060c39f4e07bdbd9a0d57a4b71a,
title = "Communicating genetics and smoking through social media: Are we there yet?",
abstract = "Background: Social media is a recent source of health information that could disseminate new scientific research, such as the genetics of smoking. Objective: The objectives were (1) to evaluate the availability of genetic information about smoking on different social media platforms (ie, YouTube, Facebook, and Twitter) and (2) to assess the type and the content of the information displayed on the social media as well as the profile of people publishing this information. Methods: We screened posts on YouTube, Facebook, and Twitter with the terms {"}smoking{"} and {"}genetic{"} at two time points (September 18, 2012, and May 7, 2013). The first 100 posts were reviewed for each media for the time points. Google was searched during Time 2 as an indicator of available information on the Web and the other social media that discussed genetics and smoking. The source of information, the country of the publisher, characteristics of the posts, and content of the posts were extracted. Results: On YouTube, Facebook, and Twitter, 31, 0, and 84 posts, respectively, were included. Posts were mostly based on smoking-related diseases, referred to scientific publications, and were largely from the United States. From the Google search, most results were scientific databases. Six scientific publications referred to within the Google search were also retrieved on either YouTube or Twitter. Conclusions: Despite the importance of public understanding of smoking and genetics, and the high use of social media, little information on this topic is actually present on social media. Therefore, there is a need to monitor the information that is there and to evaluate the population's understanding of the information related to genetics and smoking that is displayed on social media.",
author = "Viron, {Sylviane De} and Suggs, {Suzanne L.} and Angela Brand and Oyen, {Herman Van}",
year = "2013",
month = "9",
doi = "10.2196/jmir.2653",
language = "English",
volume = "15",
journal = "Journal of Medical Internet Research",
issn = "1439-4456",
publisher = "Journal of medical Internet Research",
number = "9",

}

Communicating genetics and smoking through social media : Are we there yet? / Viron, Sylviane De; Suggs, Suzanne L.; Brand, Angela; Oyen, Herman Van.

In: Journal of Medical Internet Research, Vol. 15, No. 9, e198, 09.2013.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Communicating genetics and smoking through social media

T2 - Are we there yet?

AU - Viron, Sylviane De

AU - Suggs, Suzanne L.

AU - Brand, Angela

AU - Oyen, Herman Van

PY - 2013/9

Y1 - 2013/9

N2 - Background: Social media is a recent source of health information that could disseminate new scientific research, such as the genetics of smoking. Objective: The objectives were (1) to evaluate the availability of genetic information about smoking on different social media platforms (ie, YouTube, Facebook, and Twitter) and (2) to assess the type and the content of the information displayed on the social media as well as the profile of people publishing this information. Methods: We screened posts on YouTube, Facebook, and Twitter with the terms "smoking" and "genetic" at two time points (September 18, 2012, and May 7, 2013). The first 100 posts were reviewed for each media for the time points. Google was searched during Time 2 as an indicator of available information on the Web and the other social media that discussed genetics and smoking. The source of information, the country of the publisher, characteristics of the posts, and content of the posts were extracted. Results: On YouTube, Facebook, and Twitter, 31, 0, and 84 posts, respectively, were included. Posts were mostly based on smoking-related diseases, referred to scientific publications, and were largely from the United States. From the Google search, most results were scientific databases. Six scientific publications referred to within the Google search were also retrieved on either YouTube or Twitter. Conclusions: Despite the importance of public understanding of smoking and genetics, and the high use of social media, little information on this topic is actually present on social media. Therefore, there is a need to monitor the information that is there and to evaluate the population's understanding of the information related to genetics and smoking that is displayed on social media.

AB - Background: Social media is a recent source of health information that could disseminate new scientific research, such as the genetics of smoking. Objective: The objectives were (1) to evaluate the availability of genetic information about smoking on different social media platforms (ie, YouTube, Facebook, and Twitter) and (2) to assess the type and the content of the information displayed on the social media as well as the profile of people publishing this information. Methods: We screened posts on YouTube, Facebook, and Twitter with the terms "smoking" and "genetic" at two time points (September 18, 2012, and May 7, 2013). The first 100 posts were reviewed for each media for the time points. Google was searched during Time 2 as an indicator of available information on the Web and the other social media that discussed genetics and smoking. The source of information, the country of the publisher, characteristics of the posts, and content of the posts were extracted. Results: On YouTube, Facebook, and Twitter, 31, 0, and 84 posts, respectively, were included. Posts were mostly based on smoking-related diseases, referred to scientific publications, and were largely from the United States. From the Google search, most results were scientific databases. Six scientific publications referred to within the Google search were also retrieved on either YouTube or Twitter. Conclusions: Despite the importance of public understanding of smoking and genetics, and the high use of social media, little information on this topic is actually present on social media. Therefore, there is a need to monitor the information that is there and to evaluate the population's understanding of the information related to genetics and smoking that is displayed on social media.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84887711590&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84887711590&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2196/jmir.2653

DO - 10.2196/jmir.2653

M3 - Article

VL - 15

JO - Journal of Medical Internet Research

JF - Journal of Medical Internet Research

SN - 1439-4456

IS - 9

M1 - e198

ER -