Comparative evaluation of flexural strength of composite resin and microhardness of silver amalgam and composite resin to zirconomer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Aim of this study was to evaluate the flexural strength between composite resin and Zirconomer and to compare the microhardness of silver amalgam and composite resin to Zirconomer. In flexural strength analysis, ten specimens each of composite resin and Zirconomer with 25 mm × 2 mm × 2 mm dimensions were fabricated and were subjected to three point bend test. The specimen beams were then loaded at the center with the striker and the flexural strength was measured by using universal testing machine. For microhardness analysis, ten samples each of silver amalgam, composite resin and Zirconomer with 4.0 mm diameter × 4.0 mm height were prepared and subjected to Knoop hardness tester. On flexural strength analysis, composite resin samples had higher flexural strength than Zirconomer. On microhardness analysis, there was a significant difference between all the three groups in which amalgam group had the highest microhardness and Zirconomer group had the least microhardness. When composite resin group was compared with amalgam group, amalgam samples demonstrated the highest microhardness. It can be concluded that, Zirconomer exhibited poor flexural strength and microhardness when compared with composite resin and silver amalgam.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)21-28
Number of pages8
JournalInternational Journal of Clinical Dentistry
Volume12
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 01-01-2019

Fingerprint

Composite Resins
Silver
Hardness

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Dentistry(all)

Cite this

@article{d03d5110e09f4da0be64261dafa9f867,
title = "Comparative evaluation of flexural strength of composite resin and microhardness of silver amalgam and composite resin to zirconomer",
abstract = "Aim of this study was to evaluate the flexural strength between composite resin and Zirconomer and to compare the microhardness of silver amalgam and composite resin to Zirconomer. In flexural strength analysis, ten specimens each of composite resin and Zirconomer with 25 mm × 2 mm × 2 mm dimensions were fabricated and were subjected to three point bend test. The specimen beams were then loaded at the center with the striker and the flexural strength was measured by using universal testing machine. For microhardness analysis, ten samples each of silver amalgam, composite resin and Zirconomer with 4.0 mm diameter × 4.0 mm height were prepared and subjected to Knoop hardness tester. On flexural strength analysis, composite resin samples had higher flexural strength than Zirconomer. On microhardness analysis, there was a significant difference between all the three groups in which amalgam group had the highest microhardness and Zirconomer group had the least microhardness. When composite resin group was compared with amalgam group, amalgam samples demonstrated the highest microhardness. It can be concluded that, Zirconomer exhibited poor flexural strength and microhardness when compared with composite resin and silver amalgam.",
author = "Ashna Khera and Ballal, {Nidambur Vasudev}",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
pages = "21--28",
journal = "International Journal of Clinical Dentistry",
issn = "1939-5833",
publisher = "Nova Science Publishers Inc",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparative evaluation of flexural strength of composite resin and microhardness of silver amalgam and composite resin to zirconomer

AU - Khera, Ashna

AU - Ballal, Nidambur Vasudev

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Aim of this study was to evaluate the flexural strength between composite resin and Zirconomer and to compare the microhardness of silver amalgam and composite resin to Zirconomer. In flexural strength analysis, ten specimens each of composite resin and Zirconomer with 25 mm × 2 mm × 2 mm dimensions were fabricated and were subjected to three point bend test. The specimen beams were then loaded at the center with the striker and the flexural strength was measured by using universal testing machine. For microhardness analysis, ten samples each of silver amalgam, composite resin and Zirconomer with 4.0 mm diameter × 4.0 mm height were prepared and subjected to Knoop hardness tester. On flexural strength analysis, composite resin samples had higher flexural strength than Zirconomer. On microhardness analysis, there was a significant difference between all the three groups in which amalgam group had the highest microhardness and Zirconomer group had the least microhardness. When composite resin group was compared with amalgam group, amalgam samples demonstrated the highest microhardness. It can be concluded that, Zirconomer exhibited poor flexural strength and microhardness when compared with composite resin and silver amalgam.

AB - Aim of this study was to evaluate the flexural strength between composite resin and Zirconomer and to compare the microhardness of silver amalgam and composite resin to Zirconomer. In flexural strength analysis, ten specimens each of composite resin and Zirconomer with 25 mm × 2 mm × 2 mm dimensions were fabricated and were subjected to three point bend test. The specimen beams were then loaded at the center with the striker and the flexural strength was measured by using universal testing machine. For microhardness analysis, ten samples each of silver amalgam, composite resin and Zirconomer with 4.0 mm diameter × 4.0 mm height were prepared and subjected to Knoop hardness tester. On flexural strength analysis, composite resin samples had higher flexural strength than Zirconomer. On microhardness analysis, there was a significant difference between all the three groups in which amalgam group had the highest microhardness and Zirconomer group had the least microhardness. When composite resin group was compared with amalgam group, amalgam samples demonstrated the highest microhardness. It can be concluded that, Zirconomer exhibited poor flexural strength and microhardness when compared with composite resin and silver amalgam.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85065020682&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85065020682&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85065020682

VL - 12

SP - 21

EP - 28

JO - International Journal of Clinical Dentistry

JF - International Journal of Clinical Dentistry

SN - 1939-5833

IS - 1

ER -