Comparative evaluation of fluoride release from two different glass ionomer cement and a novel alkasite restorative material – An in vitro study

Harpreet Singh, Shashi Acharya Rashmi, Swathi Pai, Sandya Kini

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective: To compare the fluoride release from Conventional Glass Ionomer Cement (GIC), Resin Modified GIC (RMGIC), and Cention N Alkasite Material. Material and Methods: Forty-five disc-shaped specimens of three different restorative materials (Conventional GIC, RMGIC, and Alkasite material) were made and divided into 3 groups (n=15). Fluoride release was evaluated at the end of Day 1, 7, 14, and Day 28 using fluoride ion-selective electrode. Intergroup and Intra-group analysis was done using One-way ANOVA with a Post-hoc test. A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Cention showed more fluoride release (in parts per million) than GIC and RMGIC at increased time duration. However, at the end of day 1, there was lesser fluoride release with Cention, as compared with the other groups. Conclusion: The new Alkasite restorative material showed promising results in terms of fluoride release and is better than GIC and RMGIC at increased time duration.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere5209
JournalPesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clinica Integrada
Volume20
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01-01-2020

Fingerprint

Glass Ionomer Cements
Fluorides
Ion-Selective Electrodes
In Vitro Techniques
Analysis of Variance

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Dentistry(all)

Cite this

@article{5bd32247613e4b9889345d9ef9ce5978,
title = "Comparative evaluation of fluoride release from two different glass ionomer cement and a novel alkasite restorative material – An in vitro study",
abstract = "Objective: To compare the fluoride release from Conventional Glass Ionomer Cement (GIC), Resin Modified GIC (RMGIC), and Cention N Alkasite Material. Material and Methods: Forty-five disc-shaped specimens of three different restorative materials (Conventional GIC, RMGIC, and Alkasite material) were made and divided into 3 groups (n=15). Fluoride release was evaluated at the end of Day 1, 7, 14, and Day 28 using fluoride ion-selective electrode. Intergroup and Intra-group analysis was done using One-way ANOVA with a Post-hoc test. A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Cention showed more fluoride release (in parts per million) than GIC and RMGIC at increased time duration. However, at the end of day 1, there was lesser fluoride release with Cention, as compared with the other groups. Conclusion: The new Alkasite restorative material showed promising results in terms of fluoride release and is better than GIC and RMGIC at increased time duration.",
author = "Harpreet Singh and {Acharya Rashmi}, Shashi and Swathi Pai and Sandya Kini",
year = "2020",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1590/pboci.2020.019",
language = "English",
volume = "20",
journal = "Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clinica Integrada",
issn = "1519-0501",
publisher = "Association of Support to Oral Health Research (APESB)",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparative evaluation of fluoride release from two different glass ionomer cement and a novel alkasite restorative material – An in vitro study

AU - Singh, Harpreet

AU - Acharya Rashmi, Shashi

AU - Pai, Swathi

AU - Kini, Sandya

PY - 2020/1/1

Y1 - 2020/1/1

N2 - Objective: To compare the fluoride release from Conventional Glass Ionomer Cement (GIC), Resin Modified GIC (RMGIC), and Cention N Alkasite Material. Material and Methods: Forty-five disc-shaped specimens of three different restorative materials (Conventional GIC, RMGIC, and Alkasite material) were made and divided into 3 groups (n=15). Fluoride release was evaluated at the end of Day 1, 7, 14, and Day 28 using fluoride ion-selective electrode. Intergroup and Intra-group analysis was done using One-way ANOVA with a Post-hoc test. A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Cention showed more fluoride release (in parts per million) than GIC and RMGIC at increased time duration. However, at the end of day 1, there was lesser fluoride release with Cention, as compared with the other groups. Conclusion: The new Alkasite restorative material showed promising results in terms of fluoride release and is better than GIC and RMGIC at increased time duration.

AB - Objective: To compare the fluoride release from Conventional Glass Ionomer Cement (GIC), Resin Modified GIC (RMGIC), and Cention N Alkasite Material. Material and Methods: Forty-five disc-shaped specimens of three different restorative materials (Conventional GIC, RMGIC, and Alkasite material) were made and divided into 3 groups (n=15). Fluoride release was evaluated at the end of Day 1, 7, 14, and Day 28 using fluoride ion-selective electrode. Intergroup and Intra-group analysis was done using One-way ANOVA with a Post-hoc test. A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Cention showed more fluoride release (in parts per million) than GIC and RMGIC at increased time duration. However, at the end of day 1, there was lesser fluoride release with Cention, as compared with the other groups. Conclusion: The new Alkasite restorative material showed promising results in terms of fluoride release and is better than GIC and RMGIC at increased time duration.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85076105824&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85076105824&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1590/pboci.2020.019

DO - 10.1590/pboci.2020.019

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85076105824

VL - 20

JO - Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clinica Integrada

JF - Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clinica Integrada

SN - 1519-0501

M1 - e5209

ER -