Comparative evaluation of second mesiobuccal canal detection in maxillary first molars using magnification and illumination

Kartik Nath, Karthik Shetty

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Aim: This in vitro study evaluated the effectiveness of detecting the presence of second mesiobuccal (MB2) canal in the maxillary first molars, using magnification and illumination. Materials and Methods: Access cavities of fifty extracted human maxillary first molars were prepared, and the floor of the pulp chamber was then explored to locate the MB2 canal in five stages: Stage I (direct vision), Stage II (under ×2.5 magnifying loupes without light-emitting diode [LED] light), Stage III (under ×2.5 magnifying loupes with LED light), Stage IV (under operating microscope at ×5), and Stage V (under operating microscope at ×12.8). Statistical Analysis: The descriptive statistics were tabulated using the kappa statistic to check the association between the five groups. Results: The operating microscope at ×5 and ×12.8 gave a diagnostic accuracy of 100%, followed by magnifying loupes with LED light which gave a diagnostic accuracy of 90% in detecting the presence of MB2 canal. The use of magnifying loupes without LED light and plain eyesight gave a comparatively lesser diagnostic accuracy, i.e., 76% and 68%, respectively. Conclusion: The operating microscope with a sensitivity and diagnostic accuracy of 100% was most effective in the detection of MB2 canals followed by magnifying loupes with LED light.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)166-169
Number of pages4
JournalSaudi Endodontic Journal
Volume7
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01-09-2017
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Lighting
Light
Dental Pulp Cavity

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Dentistry(all)

Cite this

@article{01312537a76c47d891ab31b808326bf8,
title = "Comparative evaluation of second mesiobuccal canal detection in maxillary first molars using magnification and illumination",
abstract = "Aim: This in vitro study evaluated the effectiveness of detecting the presence of second mesiobuccal (MB2) canal in the maxillary first molars, using magnification and illumination. Materials and Methods: Access cavities of fifty extracted human maxillary first molars were prepared, and the floor of the pulp chamber was then explored to locate the MB2 canal in five stages: Stage I (direct vision), Stage II (under ×2.5 magnifying loupes without light-emitting diode [LED] light), Stage III (under ×2.5 magnifying loupes with LED light), Stage IV (under operating microscope at ×5), and Stage V (under operating microscope at ×12.8). Statistical Analysis: The descriptive statistics were tabulated using the kappa statistic to check the association between the five groups. Results: The operating microscope at ×5 and ×12.8 gave a diagnostic accuracy of 100{\%}, followed by magnifying loupes with LED light which gave a diagnostic accuracy of 90{\%} in detecting the presence of MB2 canal. The use of magnifying loupes without LED light and plain eyesight gave a comparatively lesser diagnostic accuracy, i.e., 76{\%} and 68{\%}, respectively. Conclusion: The operating microscope with a sensitivity and diagnostic accuracy of 100{\%} was most effective in the detection of MB2 canals followed by magnifying loupes with LED light.",
author = "Kartik Nath and Karthik Shetty",
year = "2017",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.4103/1658-5984.213483",
language = "English",
volume = "7",
pages = "166--169",
journal = "Saudi Endodontic Journal",
issn = "2278-9618",
publisher = "Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd",
number = "3",

}

Comparative evaluation of second mesiobuccal canal detection in maxillary first molars using magnification and illumination. / Nath, Kartik; Shetty, Karthik.

In: Saudi Endodontic Journal, Vol. 7, No. 3, 01.09.2017, p. 166-169.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparative evaluation of second mesiobuccal canal detection in maxillary first molars using magnification and illumination

AU - Nath, Kartik

AU - Shetty, Karthik

PY - 2017/9/1

Y1 - 2017/9/1

N2 - Aim: This in vitro study evaluated the effectiveness of detecting the presence of second mesiobuccal (MB2) canal in the maxillary first molars, using magnification and illumination. Materials and Methods: Access cavities of fifty extracted human maxillary first molars were prepared, and the floor of the pulp chamber was then explored to locate the MB2 canal in five stages: Stage I (direct vision), Stage II (under ×2.5 magnifying loupes without light-emitting diode [LED] light), Stage III (under ×2.5 magnifying loupes with LED light), Stage IV (under operating microscope at ×5), and Stage V (under operating microscope at ×12.8). Statistical Analysis: The descriptive statistics were tabulated using the kappa statistic to check the association between the five groups. Results: The operating microscope at ×5 and ×12.8 gave a diagnostic accuracy of 100%, followed by magnifying loupes with LED light which gave a diagnostic accuracy of 90% in detecting the presence of MB2 canal. The use of magnifying loupes without LED light and plain eyesight gave a comparatively lesser diagnostic accuracy, i.e., 76% and 68%, respectively. Conclusion: The operating microscope with a sensitivity and diagnostic accuracy of 100% was most effective in the detection of MB2 canals followed by magnifying loupes with LED light.

AB - Aim: This in vitro study evaluated the effectiveness of detecting the presence of second mesiobuccal (MB2) canal in the maxillary first molars, using magnification and illumination. Materials and Methods: Access cavities of fifty extracted human maxillary first molars were prepared, and the floor of the pulp chamber was then explored to locate the MB2 canal in five stages: Stage I (direct vision), Stage II (under ×2.5 magnifying loupes without light-emitting diode [LED] light), Stage III (under ×2.5 magnifying loupes with LED light), Stage IV (under operating microscope at ×5), and Stage V (under operating microscope at ×12.8). Statistical Analysis: The descriptive statistics were tabulated using the kappa statistic to check the association between the five groups. Results: The operating microscope at ×5 and ×12.8 gave a diagnostic accuracy of 100%, followed by magnifying loupes with LED light which gave a diagnostic accuracy of 90% in detecting the presence of MB2 canal. The use of magnifying loupes without LED light and plain eyesight gave a comparatively lesser diagnostic accuracy, i.e., 76% and 68%, respectively. Conclusion: The operating microscope with a sensitivity and diagnostic accuracy of 100% was most effective in the detection of MB2 canals followed by magnifying loupes with LED light.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85028368599&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85028368599&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4103/1658-5984.213483

DO - 10.4103/1658-5984.213483

M3 - Article

VL - 7

SP - 166

EP - 169

JO - Saudi Endodontic Journal

JF - Saudi Endodontic Journal

SN - 2278-9618

IS - 3

ER -