Comparison of bone density around an immediately temporized and submerged implants placed in the region of partially edentulous posterior mandible using radiovisiography [rvg]: An in-vivo split mouth study

Bansal Sanchit, Umesh Y. Pai, Shobha J. Rodrigues, Thilak B. Shetty, Saldanha Sharon, M. Mahesh, Hegde Puneeth

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the density of bone in an immediately temporized implant and conventionally placed implant through radiovisiography. Method: Implants were placed in posterior edentulous mandibular region on either side out of which one was conventional implant and the other was immediately temporized implant. RVGs were taken at baseline and after 3 and 6 months of implant placement. The alveolar bone density was calculated at 6 different points through all the RGVs obtained at different time intervals. The values were obtained by using Image J software. All the mean values obtained were compared at different time intervals in both the groups of implants and were subjected to paired t test Results: There was no statistically significant difference in the two groups. The mean values of alveolar bone density is more in ITI group than the conventional group at all the intervals of time ( 142.60± 22.6, 132.81± 23.10 ,133.96± 24.88 and 120.67±28.77, 131.61±38.81 and 128.53± 36.05 at baseline, at 3 months and at 6 months in ITI group and conventional group respectively). Conclusion: Bone density is not affected either in immediately temporized implant or conventionally placed implant during different follow up periods although it is more in the ITI group.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)203-207
Number of pages5
JournalIndian Journal of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology
Volume13
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01-07-2019

Fingerprint

Mandible
Bone Density
Mouth
Bone
Group
Software
time
Values

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine
  • Toxicology
  • Law
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis

Cite this

@article{65801e61f87e4397b4b2af6cbad26496,
title = "Comparison of bone density around an immediately temporized and submerged implants placed in the region of partially edentulous posterior mandible using radiovisiography [rvg]: An in-vivo split mouth study",
abstract = "Purpose: To compare the density of bone in an immediately temporized implant and conventionally placed implant through radiovisiography. Method: Implants were placed in posterior edentulous mandibular region on either side out of which one was conventional implant and the other was immediately temporized implant. RVGs were taken at baseline and after 3 and 6 months of implant placement. The alveolar bone density was calculated at 6 different points through all the RGVs obtained at different time intervals. The values were obtained by using Image J software. All the mean values obtained were compared at different time intervals in both the groups of implants and were subjected to paired t test Results: There was no statistically significant difference in the two groups. The mean values of alveolar bone density is more in ITI group than the conventional group at all the intervals of time ( 142.60± 22.6, 132.81± 23.10 ,133.96± 24.88 and 120.67±28.77, 131.61±38.81 and 128.53± 36.05 at baseline, at 3 months and at 6 months in ITI group and conventional group respectively). Conclusion: Bone density is not affected either in immediately temporized implant or conventionally placed implant during different follow up periods although it is more in the ITI group.",
author = "Bansal Sanchit and Pai, {Umesh Y.} and Rodrigues, {Shobha J.} and Shetty, {Thilak B.} and Saldanha Sharon and M. Mahesh and Hegde Puneeth",
year = "2019",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.5958/0973-9130.2019.00196.8",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
pages = "203--207",
journal = "Indian Journal of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology",
issn = "0973-9122",
publisher = "Indian Journal of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of bone density around an immediately temporized and submerged implants placed in the region of partially edentulous posterior mandible using radiovisiography [rvg]

T2 - An in-vivo split mouth study

AU - Sanchit, Bansal

AU - Pai, Umesh Y.

AU - Rodrigues, Shobha J.

AU - Shetty, Thilak B.

AU - Sharon, Saldanha

AU - Mahesh, M.

AU - Puneeth, Hegde

PY - 2019/7/1

Y1 - 2019/7/1

N2 - Purpose: To compare the density of bone in an immediately temporized implant and conventionally placed implant through radiovisiography. Method: Implants were placed in posterior edentulous mandibular region on either side out of which one was conventional implant and the other was immediately temporized implant. RVGs were taken at baseline and after 3 and 6 months of implant placement. The alveolar bone density was calculated at 6 different points through all the RGVs obtained at different time intervals. The values were obtained by using Image J software. All the mean values obtained were compared at different time intervals in both the groups of implants and were subjected to paired t test Results: There was no statistically significant difference in the two groups. The mean values of alveolar bone density is more in ITI group than the conventional group at all the intervals of time ( 142.60± 22.6, 132.81± 23.10 ,133.96± 24.88 and 120.67±28.77, 131.61±38.81 and 128.53± 36.05 at baseline, at 3 months and at 6 months in ITI group and conventional group respectively). Conclusion: Bone density is not affected either in immediately temporized implant or conventionally placed implant during different follow up periods although it is more in the ITI group.

AB - Purpose: To compare the density of bone in an immediately temporized implant and conventionally placed implant through radiovisiography. Method: Implants were placed in posterior edentulous mandibular region on either side out of which one was conventional implant and the other was immediately temporized implant. RVGs were taken at baseline and after 3 and 6 months of implant placement. The alveolar bone density was calculated at 6 different points through all the RGVs obtained at different time intervals. The values were obtained by using Image J software. All the mean values obtained were compared at different time intervals in both the groups of implants and were subjected to paired t test Results: There was no statistically significant difference in the two groups. The mean values of alveolar bone density is more in ITI group than the conventional group at all the intervals of time ( 142.60± 22.6, 132.81± 23.10 ,133.96± 24.88 and 120.67±28.77, 131.61±38.81 and 128.53± 36.05 at baseline, at 3 months and at 6 months in ITI group and conventional group respectively). Conclusion: Bone density is not affected either in immediately temporized implant or conventionally placed implant during different follow up periods although it is more in the ITI group.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85071357025&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85071357025&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.5958/0973-9130.2019.00196.8

DO - 10.5958/0973-9130.2019.00196.8

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85071357025

VL - 13

SP - 203

EP - 207

JO - Indian Journal of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology

JF - Indian Journal of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology

SN - 0973-9122

IS - 3

ER -