COMPARISON OF EFFICACY OF MECHANICAL INTERMITTENT AND KALTENBORN CERVICAL TRACTION MOBILIZATION WITH BELT IN RADIATING NECK PAIN: A RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIAL

Amala Sahasrabudhe, Charu Eapen, C. P. Zulfeequer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this paper is to see the effectiveness of cervical traction manual or mechanical as an adjunct to physical therapy in the treatment of radiating neck pain. Method: 50 subjects with radiating neck pain, 25 in each group were taken. Both groups received moist heat and cervical retraction exercises for five sessions. The KTr group received Kaltenborn manual traction and the Tr group received mechanical cervical traction. Outcome measures: Numeric Pain Rating Scale and cervical ROM were taken at baseline, after first treatment and at the end of 5th day. Neck disability index and Patient-Specific Functional Scale were taken at baseline and at the end of fifth session. Results: After 5 days of treatment, statistical improvements ((Formula presented.).05) were observed in all outcome measures in both groups. The immediate reduction in pain intensity and increased range of motion was observed in the KTr group. Conclusion: The study showed that both traction methods are equally effective when used as adjunct to physical therapy in radiating neck pain treatment. Immediate effects in reduction of pain and increase in the ROM are more in the manual traction group. Hence, manual cervical traction along with physical therapy can be considered as choice of treatment for immediate improvements in pain and ROM of the cervical spine.

Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Musculoskeletal Research
DOIs
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 19-12-2017

Fingerprint

Neck Pain
Traction
Randomized Controlled Trials
Pain
Therapeutics
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Articular Range of Motion
Spine
Neck
Hot Temperature
Exercise

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

@article{e4372bd9549c44f8822aad63f033c107,
title = "COMPARISON OF EFFICACY OF MECHANICAL INTERMITTENT AND KALTENBORN CERVICAL TRACTION MOBILIZATION WITH BELT IN RADIATING NECK PAIN: A RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIAL",
abstract = "Purpose: The aim of this paper is to see the effectiveness of cervical traction manual or mechanical as an adjunct to physical therapy in the treatment of radiating neck pain. Method: 50 subjects with radiating neck pain, 25 in each group were taken. Both groups received moist heat and cervical retraction exercises for five sessions. The KTr group received Kaltenborn manual traction and the Tr group received mechanical cervical traction. Outcome measures: Numeric Pain Rating Scale and cervical ROM were taken at baseline, after first treatment and at the end of 5th day. Neck disability index and Patient-Specific Functional Scale were taken at baseline and at the end of fifth session. Results: After 5 days of treatment, statistical improvements ((Formula presented.).05) were observed in all outcome measures in both groups. The immediate reduction in pain intensity and increased range of motion was observed in the KTr group. Conclusion: The study showed that both traction methods are equally effective when used as adjunct to physical therapy in radiating neck pain treatment. Immediate effects in reduction of pain and increase in the ROM are more in the manual traction group. Hence, manual cervical traction along with physical therapy can be considered as choice of treatment for immediate improvements in pain and ROM of the cervical spine.",
author = "Amala Sahasrabudhe and Charu Eapen and Zulfeequer, {C. P.}",
year = "2017",
month = "12",
day = "19",
doi = "10.1142/S0218957717500233",
language = "English",
journal = "Journal of Musculoskeletal Research",
issn = "0218-9577",
publisher = "World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte Ltd",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - COMPARISON OF EFFICACY OF MECHANICAL INTERMITTENT AND KALTENBORN CERVICAL TRACTION MOBILIZATION WITH BELT IN RADIATING NECK PAIN

T2 - A RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIAL

AU - Sahasrabudhe, Amala

AU - Eapen, Charu

AU - Zulfeequer, C. P.

PY - 2017/12/19

Y1 - 2017/12/19

N2 - Purpose: The aim of this paper is to see the effectiveness of cervical traction manual or mechanical as an adjunct to physical therapy in the treatment of radiating neck pain. Method: 50 subjects with radiating neck pain, 25 in each group were taken. Both groups received moist heat and cervical retraction exercises for five sessions. The KTr group received Kaltenborn manual traction and the Tr group received mechanical cervical traction. Outcome measures: Numeric Pain Rating Scale and cervical ROM were taken at baseline, after first treatment and at the end of 5th day. Neck disability index and Patient-Specific Functional Scale were taken at baseline and at the end of fifth session. Results: After 5 days of treatment, statistical improvements ((Formula presented.).05) were observed in all outcome measures in both groups. The immediate reduction in pain intensity and increased range of motion was observed in the KTr group. Conclusion: The study showed that both traction methods are equally effective when used as adjunct to physical therapy in radiating neck pain treatment. Immediate effects in reduction of pain and increase in the ROM are more in the manual traction group. Hence, manual cervical traction along with physical therapy can be considered as choice of treatment for immediate improvements in pain and ROM of the cervical spine.

AB - Purpose: The aim of this paper is to see the effectiveness of cervical traction manual or mechanical as an adjunct to physical therapy in the treatment of radiating neck pain. Method: 50 subjects with radiating neck pain, 25 in each group were taken. Both groups received moist heat and cervical retraction exercises for five sessions. The KTr group received Kaltenborn manual traction and the Tr group received mechanical cervical traction. Outcome measures: Numeric Pain Rating Scale and cervical ROM were taken at baseline, after first treatment and at the end of 5th day. Neck disability index and Patient-Specific Functional Scale were taken at baseline and at the end of fifth session. Results: After 5 days of treatment, statistical improvements ((Formula presented.).05) were observed in all outcome measures in both groups. The immediate reduction in pain intensity and increased range of motion was observed in the KTr group. Conclusion: The study showed that both traction methods are equally effective when used as adjunct to physical therapy in radiating neck pain treatment. Immediate effects in reduction of pain and increase in the ROM are more in the manual traction group. Hence, manual cervical traction along with physical therapy can be considered as choice of treatment for immediate improvements in pain and ROM of the cervical spine.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85038929932&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85038929932&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1142/S0218957717500233

DO - 10.1142/S0218957717500233

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85038929932

JO - Journal of Musculoskeletal Research

JF - Journal of Musculoskeletal Research

SN - 0218-9577

ER -