Comparison of polyvinyl chloride, curved reinforced, and straight reinforced endotracheal tubes for tracheal intubation through Airtraq™ laryngoscope in anesthetized patients

Kush Goyal, Shaji Mathew, Arun Duggappa, Kanika P. Nanda, Souvik Chaudhuri, Renganathan Sockalingam

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background and Aims: The Airtraq™ video laryngoscope facilitates tracheal intubations in patients with difficult airway or cervical spine immobilization. However, curved reinforced tracheal tube and straight reinforced tracheal tubes are useful where neck of the patient is likely to be moved or flexed or if patient is in prone position, wherein nonreinforced endotracheal tube (ETT) might get kinked and/or compressed. We compared intubation success rate of curved and straight reinforced tracheal tubes with polyvinyl chloride (PVC) tracheal tube using Airtaq™ laryngoscope in paralyzed and anesthetized patients. Material and Methods: Totally, 120 patients underwent random allocation to one of the three groups using computer-generated randomization table. Patients were intubated with appropriate size and type of ETT using Airtraq™ after obtaining optimal glottis view. Experienced anesthesiologist performed endotracheal intubation and unblinded observer noted down success and ease of intubation. Results: Patients intubated with PVC tube (100%) had higher rates of successful intubation and shorter intubation time (4 s), in comparison to intubation with curved reinforced (92.5%) and straight reinforced tubes (SRTs) (85%) using Airtraq™ laryngoscope (AL). However, there was no statistical difference in the incidence of airway trauma among all the three groups. Conclusions: PVC tracheal tube is significantly superior to both curved and SRTs for intubation using AL.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)359-364
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology
Volume33
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01-07-2017

Fingerprint

Laryngoscopes
Polyvinyl Chloride
Intubation
Random Allocation
Glottis
Prone Position
Intratracheal Intubation
Immobilization
Spine
Neck
Incidence
Wounds and Injuries

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics(all)
  • Pharmacology (medical)
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Cite this

Goyal, Kush ; Mathew, Shaji ; Duggappa, Arun ; Nanda, Kanika P. ; Chaudhuri, Souvik ; Sockalingam, Renganathan. / Comparison of polyvinyl chloride, curved reinforced, and straight reinforced endotracheal tubes for tracheal intubation through Airtraq™ laryngoscope in anesthetized patients. In: Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology. 2017 ; Vol. 33, No. 3. pp. 359-364.
@article{9061170685894c019feba9ad208bf9b1,
title = "Comparison of polyvinyl chloride, curved reinforced, and straight reinforced endotracheal tubes for tracheal intubation through Airtraq™ laryngoscope in anesthetized patients",
abstract = "Background and Aims: The Airtraq™ video laryngoscope facilitates tracheal intubations in patients with difficult airway or cervical spine immobilization. However, curved reinforced tracheal tube and straight reinforced tracheal tubes are useful where neck of the patient is likely to be moved or flexed or if patient is in prone position, wherein nonreinforced endotracheal tube (ETT) might get kinked and/or compressed. We compared intubation success rate of curved and straight reinforced tracheal tubes with polyvinyl chloride (PVC) tracheal tube using Airtaq™ laryngoscope in paralyzed and anesthetized patients. Material and Methods: Totally, 120 patients underwent random allocation to one of the three groups using computer-generated randomization table. Patients were intubated with appropriate size and type of ETT using Airtraq™ after obtaining optimal glottis view. Experienced anesthesiologist performed endotracheal intubation and unblinded observer noted down success and ease of intubation. Results: Patients intubated with PVC tube (100{\%}) had higher rates of successful intubation and shorter intubation time (4 s), in comparison to intubation with curved reinforced (92.5{\%}) and straight reinforced tubes (SRTs) (85{\%}) using Airtraq™ laryngoscope (AL). However, there was no statistical difference in the incidence of airway trauma among all the three groups. Conclusions: PVC tracheal tube is significantly superior to both curved and SRTs for intubation using AL.",
author = "Kush Goyal and Shaji Mathew and Arun Duggappa and Nanda, {Kanika P.} and Souvik Chaudhuri and Renganathan Sockalingam",
year = "2017",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.4103/0970-9185.214312",
language = "English",
volume = "33",
pages = "359--364",
journal = "Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology",
issn = "0970-9185",
publisher = "Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology",
number = "3",

}

Comparison of polyvinyl chloride, curved reinforced, and straight reinforced endotracheal tubes for tracheal intubation through Airtraq™ laryngoscope in anesthetized patients. / Goyal, Kush; Mathew, Shaji; Duggappa, Arun; Nanda, Kanika P.; Chaudhuri, Souvik; Sockalingam, Renganathan.

In: Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology, Vol. 33, No. 3, 01.07.2017, p. 359-364.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of polyvinyl chloride, curved reinforced, and straight reinforced endotracheal tubes for tracheal intubation through Airtraq™ laryngoscope in anesthetized patients

AU - Goyal, Kush

AU - Mathew, Shaji

AU - Duggappa, Arun

AU - Nanda, Kanika P.

AU - Chaudhuri, Souvik

AU - Sockalingam, Renganathan

PY - 2017/7/1

Y1 - 2017/7/1

N2 - Background and Aims: The Airtraq™ video laryngoscope facilitates tracheal intubations in patients with difficult airway or cervical spine immobilization. However, curved reinforced tracheal tube and straight reinforced tracheal tubes are useful where neck of the patient is likely to be moved or flexed or if patient is in prone position, wherein nonreinforced endotracheal tube (ETT) might get kinked and/or compressed. We compared intubation success rate of curved and straight reinforced tracheal tubes with polyvinyl chloride (PVC) tracheal tube using Airtaq™ laryngoscope in paralyzed and anesthetized patients. Material and Methods: Totally, 120 patients underwent random allocation to one of the three groups using computer-generated randomization table. Patients were intubated with appropriate size and type of ETT using Airtraq™ after obtaining optimal glottis view. Experienced anesthesiologist performed endotracheal intubation and unblinded observer noted down success and ease of intubation. Results: Patients intubated with PVC tube (100%) had higher rates of successful intubation and shorter intubation time (4 s), in comparison to intubation with curved reinforced (92.5%) and straight reinforced tubes (SRTs) (85%) using Airtraq™ laryngoscope (AL). However, there was no statistical difference in the incidence of airway trauma among all the three groups. Conclusions: PVC tracheal tube is significantly superior to both curved and SRTs for intubation using AL.

AB - Background and Aims: The Airtraq™ video laryngoscope facilitates tracheal intubations in patients with difficult airway or cervical spine immobilization. However, curved reinforced tracheal tube and straight reinforced tracheal tubes are useful where neck of the patient is likely to be moved or flexed or if patient is in prone position, wherein nonreinforced endotracheal tube (ETT) might get kinked and/or compressed. We compared intubation success rate of curved and straight reinforced tracheal tubes with polyvinyl chloride (PVC) tracheal tube using Airtaq™ laryngoscope in paralyzed and anesthetized patients. Material and Methods: Totally, 120 patients underwent random allocation to one of the three groups using computer-generated randomization table. Patients were intubated with appropriate size and type of ETT using Airtraq™ after obtaining optimal glottis view. Experienced anesthesiologist performed endotracheal intubation and unblinded observer noted down success and ease of intubation. Results: Patients intubated with PVC tube (100%) had higher rates of successful intubation and shorter intubation time (4 s), in comparison to intubation with curved reinforced (92.5%) and straight reinforced tubes (SRTs) (85%) using Airtraq™ laryngoscope (AL). However, there was no statistical difference in the incidence of airway trauma among all the three groups. Conclusions: PVC tracheal tube is significantly superior to both curved and SRTs for intubation using AL.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85029534885&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85029534885&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4103/0970-9185.214312

DO - 10.4103/0970-9185.214312

M3 - Article

VL - 33

SP - 359

EP - 364

JO - Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology

JF - Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology

SN - 0970-9185

IS - 3

ER -