Comparison of the effects of Buteyko and pranayama breathing techniques on quality of life in patients with asthma - A randomized controlled trial

Venkatesan Prem, Ramesh Chandra Sahoo, Prabha Adhikari

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

22 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To compare two breathing exercises (Buteyko and pranayama) with a control group in patients with asthma. Design: Randomized controlled trial. Subjects: One hundred and twenty subjects were randomized to three groups through block randomization. Subjects with an Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire score <5.5 participated in the study. Setting: Outpatient pulmonary medicine department. Interventions: Subjects in the Buteyko and pranayama groups were trained for 3-5 days and instructed to practise the exercises for 15 minutes twice daily, and for three months duration. The control group underwent routine pharmacological management during the study period. Outcome measures: Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire, Asthma Control Questionnaire and pulmonary function test. Results: The baseline characteristics were similar in all three groups. Post intervention, the Buteyko group showed better trends of improvement (mean (95% confidence interval), P-value) in total Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire score than the pranayama (0.47 (-0.008-0.95), P = 0.056) and control groups (0.97 (0.48-1.46), P = 0.0001). In comparison between the pranayama and control groups, pranayama showed significant improvement (0.50 (0.01-0.98), P = 0.042) in total Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire score. Conclusion: The Buteyko group showed better trends of improvement in quality of life and asthma control than the group performing the pranayama breathing exercise.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)133-141
Number of pages9
JournalClinical Rehabilitation
Volume27
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01-02-2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Respiration
Asthma
Randomized Controlled Trials
Quality of Life
Control Groups
Breathing Exercises
Pulmonary Medicine
Respiratory Function Tests
Random Allocation
Outpatients
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Surveys and Questionnaires
Pharmacology
Confidence Intervals
Exercise

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
  • Rehabilitation

Cite this

@article{e4d6fa0a5ac947f490bf83d70c9fd70d,
title = "Comparison of the effects of Buteyko and pranayama breathing techniques on quality of life in patients with asthma - A randomized controlled trial",
abstract = "Objective: To compare two breathing exercises (Buteyko and pranayama) with a control group in patients with asthma. Design: Randomized controlled trial. Subjects: One hundred and twenty subjects were randomized to three groups through block randomization. Subjects with an Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire score <5.5 participated in the study. Setting: Outpatient pulmonary medicine department. Interventions: Subjects in the Buteyko and pranayama groups were trained for 3-5 days and instructed to practise the exercises for 15 minutes twice daily, and for three months duration. The control group underwent routine pharmacological management during the study period. Outcome measures: Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire, Asthma Control Questionnaire and pulmonary function test. Results: The baseline characteristics were similar in all three groups. Post intervention, the Buteyko group showed better trends of improvement (mean (95{\%} confidence interval), P-value) in total Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire score than the pranayama (0.47 (-0.008-0.95), P = 0.056) and control groups (0.97 (0.48-1.46), P = 0.0001). In comparison between the pranayama and control groups, pranayama showed significant improvement (0.50 (0.01-0.98), P = 0.042) in total Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire score. Conclusion: The Buteyko group showed better trends of improvement in quality of life and asthma control than the group performing the pranayama breathing exercise.",
author = "Venkatesan Prem and Sahoo, {Ramesh Chandra} and Prabha Adhikari",
year = "2013",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0269215512450521",
language = "English",
volume = "27",
pages = "133--141",
journal = "Clinical Rehabilitation",
issn = "0269-2155",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "2",

}

Comparison of the effects of Buteyko and pranayama breathing techniques on quality of life in patients with asthma - A randomized controlled trial. / Prem, Venkatesan; Sahoo, Ramesh Chandra; Adhikari, Prabha.

In: Clinical Rehabilitation, Vol. 27, No. 2, 01.02.2013, p. 133-141.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of the effects of Buteyko and pranayama breathing techniques on quality of life in patients with asthma - A randomized controlled trial

AU - Prem, Venkatesan

AU - Sahoo, Ramesh Chandra

AU - Adhikari, Prabha

PY - 2013/2/1

Y1 - 2013/2/1

N2 - Objective: To compare two breathing exercises (Buteyko and pranayama) with a control group in patients with asthma. Design: Randomized controlled trial. Subjects: One hundred and twenty subjects were randomized to three groups through block randomization. Subjects with an Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire score <5.5 participated in the study. Setting: Outpatient pulmonary medicine department. Interventions: Subjects in the Buteyko and pranayama groups were trained for 3-5 days and instructed to practise the exercises for 15 minutes twice daily, and for three months duration. The control group underwent routine pharmacological management during the study period. Outcome measures: Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire, Asthma Control Questionnaire and pulmonary function test. Results: The baseline characteristics were similar in all three groups. Post intervention, the Buteyko group showed better trends of improvement (mean (95% confidence interval), P-value) in total Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire score than the pranayama (0.47 (-0.008-0.95), P = 0.056) and control groups (0.97 (0.48-1.46), P = 0.0001). In comparison between the pranayama and control groups, pranayama showed significant improvement (0.50 (0.01-0.98), P = 0.042) in total Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire score. Conclusion: The Buteyko group showed better trends of improvement in quality of life and asthma control than the group performing the pranayama breathing exercise.

AB - Objective: To compare two breathing exercises (Buteyko and pranayama) with a control group in patients with asthma. Design: Randomized controlled trial. Subjects: One hundred and twenty subjects were randomized to three groups through block randomization. Subjects with an Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire score <5.5 participated in the study. Setting: Outpatient pulmonary medicine department. Interventions: Subjects in the Buteyko and pranayama groups were trained for 3-5 days and instructed to practise the exercises for 15 minutes twice daily, and for three months duration. The control group underwent routine pharmacological management during the study period. Outcome measures: Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire, Asthma Control Questionnaire and pulmonary function test. Results: The baseline characteristics were similar in all three groups. Post intervention, the Buteyko group showed better trends of improvement (mean (95% confidence interval), P-value) in total Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire score than the pranayama (0.47 (-0.008-0.95), P = 0.056) and control groups (0.97 (0.48-1.46), P = 0.0001). In comparison between the pranayama and control groups, pranayama showed significant improvement (0.50 (0.01-0.98), P = 0.042) in total Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire score. Conclusion: The Buteyko group showed better trends of improvement in quality of life and asthma control than the group performing the pranayama breathing exercise.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84872725517&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84872725517&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0269215512450521

DO - 10.1177/0269215512450521

M3 - Article

C2 - 22837543

AN - SCOPUS:84872725517

VL - 27

SP - 133

EP - 141

JO - Clinical Rehabilitation

JF - Clinical Rehabilitation

SN - 0269-2155

IS - 2

ER -