Comparison of two techniques for insertion of classic laryngeal mask airway

Gurudas Kini, Alex Joseph, H. M. Krishna

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Background : We compared the ease of insertion of classic LMA™ and the fibreoptic assessment of LMA position between standard technique of LMA insertion and laryngoscopic aided insertion Patients and Methods : After IRB approval, 60 consenting adult patients belonging to ASA physical status 1or 2 scheduled to undergo short surgical procedure under general anaesthesia were randomized into two groups , Group S and Group L. In Group S, after induction of anaesthesia with propofol 2.5 mgkg-1, size 3 or size 4 classic LMA was inserted by standard technique described by Brain A I J. In group L LMA was inserted with the help of Macintosh laryngoscope. Ease of LMA insertion was recorded. Fibreoptic grading of final position of LMA was done. Presence of blood on the LMA was noted while removing it. Data were analyzed using Chi square test. P<0.05 was regarded as significant. Results: Patient characteristics were comparable between the two groups. There was no difference in ease of LMA insertion between the groups (P=0.612). Final LMA position was significantly better in group L compared to group S (P=0.000). Incidence of blood on LMA was similar in both the groups (P=0.765). Conclusions: Laryngoscopic technique of insertion provides a better final positioning of the classic LMA™ when compared to the standard insertion technique as confirmed by the fibreoptic bronchoscope.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)441-443
Number of pages3
JournalJournal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology
Volume24
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - 10-2008

Fingerprint

Laryngeal Masks
Laryngoscopes
Bronchoscopes
Research Ethics Committees
Propofol
Chi-Square Distribution
General Anesthesia
Anesthesia
Incidence
Brain

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
  • Pharmacology (medical)
  • Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics(all)

Cite this

@article{7cde74a1fac74bbf9d19726140ebab0c,
title = "Comparison of two techniques for insertion of classic laryngeal mask airway",
abstract = "Background : We compared the ease of insertion of classic LMA™ and the fibreoptic assessment of LMA position between standard technique of LMA insertion and laryngoscopic aided insertion Patients and Methods : After IRB approval, 60 consenting adult patients belonging to ASA physical status 1or 2 scheduled to undergo short surgical procedure under general anaesthesia were randomized into two groups , Group S and Group L. In Group S, after induction of anaesthesia with propofol 2.5 mgkg-1, size 3 or size 4 classic LMA was inserted by standard technique described by Brain A I J. In group L LMA was inserted with the help of Macintosh laryngoscope. Ease of LMA insertion was recorded. Fibreoptic grading of final position of LMA was done. Presence of blood on the LMA was noted while removing it. Data were analyzed using Chi square test. P<0.05 was regarded as significant. Results: Patient characteristics were comparable between the two groups. There was no difference in ease of LMA insertion between the groups (P=0.612). Final LMA position was significantly better in group L compared to group S (P=0.000). Incidence of blood on LMA was similar in both the groups (P=0.765). Conclusions: Laryngoscopic technique of insertion provides a better final positioning of the classic LMA™ when compared to the standard insertion technique as confirmed by the fibreoptic bronchoscope.",
author = "Gurudas Kini and Alex Joseph and Krishna, {H. M.}",
year = "2008",
month = "10",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
pages = "441--443",
journal = "Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology",
issn = "0970-9185",
publisher = "Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology",
number = "4",

}

Comparison of two techniques for insertion of classic laryngeal mask airway. / Kini, Gurudas; Joseph, Alex; Krishna, H. M.

In: Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology, Vol. 24, No. 4, 10.2008, p. 441-443.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of two techniques for insertion of classic laryngeal mask airway

AU - Kini, Gurudas

AU - Joseph, Alex

AU - Krishna, H. M.

PY - 2008/10

Y1 - 2008/10

N2 - Background : We compared the ease of insertion of classic LMA™ and the fibreoptic assessment of LMA position between standard technique of LMA insertion and laryngoscopic aided insertion Patients and Methods : After IRB approval, 60 consenting adult patients belonging to ASA physical status 1or 2 scheduled to undergo short surgical procedure under general anaesthesia were randomized into two groups , Group S and Group L. In Group S, after induction of anaesthesia with propofol 2.5 mgkg-1, size 3 or size 4 classic LMA was inserted by standard technique described by Brain A I J. In group L LMA was inserted with the help of Macintosh laryngoscope. Ease of LMA insertion was recorded. Fibreoptic grading of final position of LMA was done. Presence of blood on the LMA was noted while removing it. Data were analyzed using Chi square test. P<0.05 was regarded as significant. Results: Patient characteristics were comparable between the two groups. There was no difference in ease of LMA insertion between the groups (P=0.612). Final LMA position was significantly better in group L compared to group S (P=0.000). Incidence of blood on LMA was similar in both the groups (P=0.765). Conclusions: Laryngoscopic technique of insertion provides a better final positioning of the classic LMA™ when compared to the standard insertion technique as confirmed by the fibreoptic bronchoscope.

AB - Background : We compared the ease of insertion of classic LMA™ and the fibreoptic assessment of LMA position between standard technique of LMA insertion and laryngoscopic aided insertion Patients and Methods : After IRB approval, 60 consenting adult patients belonging to ASA physical status 1or 2 scheduled to undergo short surgical procedure under general anaesthesia were randomized into two groups , Group S and Group L. In Group S, after induction of anaesthesia with propofol 2.5 mgkg-1, size 3 or size 4 classic LMA was inserted by standard technique described by Brain A I J. In group L LMA was inserted with the help of Macintosh laryngoscope. Ease of LMA insertion was recorded. Fibreoptic grading of final position of LMA was done. Presence of blood on the LMA was noted while removing it. Data were analyzed using Chi square test. P<0.05 was regarded as significant. Results: Patient characteristics were comparable between the two groups. There was no difference in ease of LMA insertion between the groups (P=0.612). Final LMA position was significantly better in group L compared to group S (P=0.000). Incidence of blood on LMA was similar in both the groups (P=0.765). Conclusions: Laryngoscopic technique of insertion provides a better final positioning of the classic LMA™ when compared to the standard insertion technique as confirmed by the fibreoptic bronchoscope.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=55449129818&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=55449129818&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 24

SP - 441

EP - 443

JO - Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology

JF - Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology

SN - 0970-9185

IS - 4

ER -