Comparison of two techniques of insertion of oesophageal-tracheal double lumen airway (Combitube®)

Anitha Shenoy, Srisha Shenoy, Manjunath Prabhu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The use of Combitube® can be considered in patients with previously unrecognised difficult airway. It secures the airway and protects it against aspiration of regurgitated gastric contents but its insertion is associated with a high incidence of complications. We compared two techniques of insertion of the Combitube® in 37 patients undergoing gynaecological laparoscopic surgery. They were divided into two groups: The Combitube® was inserted blindly in Group B (n=19) and was laryngoscope-aided in Group L (n=18). The time to successful insertion was significantly shorter in Group B (44s) Vs Group L (56s) but the ease of insertion was graded significantly better using a laryngoscope. The incidence of sore throat/hoarseness was significantly higher in Group B (78.9%) as compared to Group L (38.8%). The incidence of trauma as evidenced by blood on the tube was 68% and 50% in Group B and Group L respectively. The anaesthetic can be safely continued with a Combitube® in place. However, the design of the tube precludes direct access to the trachea.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)45-50
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology
Volume20
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 01-2004

Fingerprint

Laryngoscopes
Incidence
Hoarseness
Gynecologic Surgical Procedures
Gastrointestinal Contents
Pharyngitis
Trachea
Laparoscopy
Anesthetics
Wounds and Injuries
Protect-It

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
  • Pharmacology (medical)
  • Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics(all)

Cite this

@article{036e86631edb430db823751d5629b5c2,
title = "Comparison of two techniques of insertion of oesophageal-tracheal double lumen airway (Combitube{\circledR})",
abstract = "The use of Combitube{\circledR} can be considered in patients with previously unrecognised difficult airway. It secures the airway and protects it against aspiration of regurgitated gastric contents but its insertion is associated with a high incidence of complications. We compared two techniques of insertion of the Combitube{\circledR} in 37 patients undergoing gynaecological laparoscopic surgery. They were divided into two groups: The Combitube{\circledR} was inserted blindly in Group B (n=19) and was laryngoscope-aided in Group L (n=18). The time to successful insertion was significantly shorter in Group B (44s) Vs Group L (56s) but the ease of insertion was graded significantly better using a laryngoscope. The incidence of sore throat/hoarseness was significantly higher in Group B (78.9{\%}) as compared to Group L (38.8{\%}). The incidence of trauma as evidenced by blood on the tube was 68{\%} and 50{\%} in Group B and Group L respectively. The anaesthetic can be safely continued with a Combitube{\circledR} in place. However, the design of the tube precludes direct access to the trachea.",
author = "Anitha Shenoy and Srisha Shenoy and Manjunath Prabhu",
year = "2004",
month = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "20",
pages = "45--50",
journal = "Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology",
issn = "0970-9185",
publisher = "Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology",
number = "1",

}

Comparison of two techniques of insertion of oesophageal-tracheal double lumen airway (Combitube®). / Shenoy, Anitha; Shenoy, Srisha; Prabhu, Manjunath.

In: Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology, Vol. 20, No. 1, 01.2004, p. 45-50.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of two techniques of insertion of oesophageal-tracheal double lumen airway (Combitube®)

AU - Shenoy, Anitha

AU - Shenoy, Srisha

AU - Prabhu, Manjunath

PY - 2004/1

Y1 - 2004/1

N2 - The use of Combitube® can be considered in patients with previously unrecognised difficult airway. It secures the airway and protects it against aspiration of regurgitated gastric contents but its insertion is associated with a high incidence of complications. We compared two techniques of insertion of the Combitube® in 37 patients undergoing gynaecological laparoscopic surgery. They were divided into two groups: The Combitube® was inserted blindly in Group B (n=19) and was laryngoscope-aided in Group L (n=18). The time to successful insertion was significantly shorter in Group B (44s) Vs Group L (56s) but the ease of insertion was graded significantly better using a laryngoscope. The incidence of sore throat/hoarseness was significantly higher in Group B (78.9%) as compared to Group L (38.8%). The incidence of trauma as evidenced by blood on the tube was 68% and 50% in Group B and Group L respectively. The anaesthetic can be safely continued with a Combitube® in place. However, the design of the tube precludes direct access to the trachea.

AB - The use of Combitube® can be considered in patients with previously unrecognised difficult airway. It secures the airway and protects it against aspiration of regurgitated gastric contents but its insertion is associated with a high incidence of complications. We compared two techniques of insertion of the Combitube® in 37 patients undergoing gynaecological laparoscopic surgery. They were divided into two groups: The Combitube® was inserted blindly in Group B (n=19) and was laryngoscope-aided in Group L (n=18). The time to successful insertion was significantly shorter in Group B (44s) Vs Group L (56s) but the ease of insertion was graded significantly better using a laryngoscope. The incidence of sore throat/hoarseness was significantly higher in Group B (78.9%) as compared to Group L (38.8%). The incidence of trauma as evidenced by blood on the tube was 68% and 50% in Group B and Group L respectively. The anaesthetic can be safely continued with a Combitube® in place. However, the design of the tube precludes direct access to the trachea.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=4544264462&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=4544264462&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 20

SP - 45

EP - 50

JO - Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology

JF - Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology

SN - 0970-9185

IS - 1

ER -