Comparison of vestibular evoked myogenic potentials elicited by click and short duration tone burst stimuli

K. Kumar, S. Kumar Sinha, A. Kumar Bharti, A. Barman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction: Vestibular evoked myogenic potentials are short latency electrical impulses that are produced in response to higher level acoustic stimuli. They are used clinically to diagnose sacculocollic pathway dysfunction.Aim: This study aimed to compare the vestibular evoked myogenic potential responses elicited by click stimuli and short duration tone burst stimuli, in normal hearing individuals.Method: Seventeen subjects participated. In all subjects, we assessed vestibular evoked myogenic potentials elicited by click and short duration tone burst stimuli.Results and conclusion: The latency of the vestibular evoked myogenic potential responses (i.e. the p13 and n23 peaks) was longer for tone burst stimuli compared with click stimuli. The amplitude of the p13-n23 waveform was greater for tone burst stimuli than click stimuli. Thus, the click stimulus may be preferable for clinical assessment and identification of abnormalities as this stimulus has less variability, while a low frequency tone burst stimulus may be preferable when assessing the presence or absence of vestibular evoked myogenic potential responses.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)343-347
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Laryngology and Otology
Volume125
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 04-2011

Fingerprint

Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials
Acoustics
Hearing

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Otorhinolaryngology

Cite this

@article{e7eac05dfd9344e19856e6738dd98565,
title = "Comparison of vestibular evoked myogenic potentials elicited by click and short duration tone burst stimuli",
abstract = "Introduction: Vestibular evoked myogenic potentials are short latency electrical impulses that are produced in response to higher level acoustic stimuli. They are used clinically to diagnose sacculocollic pathway dysfunction.Aim: This study aimed to compare the vestibular evoked myogenic potential responses elicited by click stimuli and short duration tone burst stimuli, in normal hearing individuals.Method: Seventeen subjects participated. In all subjects, we assessed vestibular evoked myogenic potentials elicited by click and short duration tone burst stimuli.Results and conclusion: The latency of the vestibular evoked myogenic potential responses (i.e. the p13 and n23 peaks) was longer for tone burst stimuli compared with click stimuli. The amplitude of the p13-n23 waveform was greater for tone burst stimuli than click stimuli. Thus, the click stimulus may be preferable for clinical assessment and identification of abnormalities as this stimulus has less variability, while a low frequency tone burst stimulus may be preferable when assessing the presence or absence of vestibular evoked myogenic potential responses.",
author = "K. Kumar and Sinha, {S. Kumar} and Bharti, {A. Kumar} and A. Barman",
year = "2011",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1017/S0022215110001908",
language = "English",
volume = "125",
pages = "343--347",
journal = "Journal of Laryngology and Otology",
issn = "0022-2151",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "4",

}

Comparison of vestibular evoked myogenic potentials elicited by click and short duration tone burst stimuli. / Kumar, K.; Sinha, S. Kumar; Bharti, A. Kumar; Barman, A.

In: Journal of Laryngology and Otology, Vol. 125, No. 4, 04.2011, p. 343-347.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of vestibular evoked myogenic potentials elicited by click and short duration tone burst stimuli

AU - Kumar, K.

AU - Sinha, S. Kumar

AU - Bharti, A. Kumar

AU - Barman, A.

PY - 2011/4

Y1 - 2011/4

N2 - Introduction: Vestibular evoked myogenic potentials are short latency electrical impulses that are produced in response to higher level acoustic stimuli. They are used clinically to diagnose sacculocollic pathway dysfunction.Aim: This study aimed to compare the vestibular evoked myogenic potential responses elicited by click stimuli and short duration tone burst stimuli, in normal hearing individuals.Method: Seventeen subjects participated. In all subjects, we assessed vestibular evoked myogenic potentials elicited by click and short duration tone burst stimuli.Results and conclusion: The latency of the vestibular evoked myogenic potential responses (i.e. the p13 and n23 peaks) was longer for tone burst stimuli compared with click stimuli. The amplitude of the p13-n23 waveform was greater for tone burst stimuli than click stimuli. Thus, the click stimulus may be preferable for clinical assessment and identification of abnormalities as this stimulus has less variability, while a low frequency tone burst stimulus may be preferable when assessing the presence or absence of vestibular evoked myogenic potential responses.

AB - Introduction: Vestibular evoked myogenic potentials are short latency electrical impulses that are produced in response to higher level acoustic stimuli. They are used clinically to diagnose sacculocollic pathway dysfunction.Aim: This study aimed to compare the vestibular evoked myogenic potential responses elicited by click stimuli and short duration tone burst stimuli, in normal hearing individuals.Method: Seventeen subjects participated. In all subjects, we assessed vestibular evoked myogenic potentials elicited by click and short duration tone burst stimuli.Results and conclusion: The latency of the vestibular evoked myogenic potential responses (i.e. the p13 and n23 peaks) was longer for tone burst stimuli compared with click stimuli. The amplitude of the p13-n23 waveform was greater for tone burst stimuli than click stimuli. Thus, the click stimulus may be preferable for clinical assessment and identification of abnormalities as this stimulus has less variability, while a low frequency tone burst stimulus may be preferable when assessing the presence or absence of vestibular evoked myogenic potential responses.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79958761000&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79958761000&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S0022215110001908

DO - 10.1017/S0022215110001908

M3 - Article

VL - 125

SP - 343

EP - 347

JO - Journal of Laryngology and Otology

JF - Journal of Laryngology and Otology

SN - 0022-2151

IS - 4

ER -