Completeness of reporting in Indian qualitative public health research: A systematic review of 20 years of literature

Myron Anthony Godinho, Nachiket Gudi, Maja Milkowska, Shruti Murthy, Ajay Bailey, N. Sreekumaran Nair

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Background This study reviewed the completeness of reporting in Indian qualitative public health research (QPHR) studies using the 'Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research' (COREQ) checklist. Methods Search results from five electronic databases were screened by two independent reviewers. We included English-language, primary QPHR studies from India, which were assessed for their compliance with the COREQ checklist. Each COREQ item was noted as either reported or unreported. Descriptive statistics for the number of COREQ items reported by each study, and the number of studies that reported each COREQ item were reported, as were the items reported in each year, and in pre- A nd post-COREQ time periods. Results Of 537 citations, 246 articles were included. Trends demonstrated an increasing number of Indian QPHR studies being published annually, and an overall increase in reporting completeness since 1997. Only two COREQ items were reported in all studies. 52.4% of articles reported between 16 and 21 items, corresponding to 43-57% of items being reported. Six items were reported in fewer than 10% of studies. COREQ domain 1 was least frequently reported. Conclusions Despite improving trends, the reporting of QPHR in India is incomplete. Authors and journals should ensure adherence to reporting guidelines.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)405-411
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Public Health (United Kingdom)
Volume41
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01-01-2019

Fingerprint

Qualitative Research
Public Health
Research
Checklist
India
Language
Databases
Guidelines

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Godinho, Myron Anthony ; Gudi, Nachiket ; Milkowska, Maja ; Murthy, Shruti ; Bailey, Ajay ; Nair, N. Sreekumaran. / Completeness of reporting in Indian qualitative public health research : A systematic review of 20 years of literature. In: Journal of Public Health (United Kingdom). 2019 ; Vol. 41, No. 2. pp. 405-411.
@article{319e2cf6bcc44189a1bc3352b022b42b,
title = "Completeness of reporting in Indian qualitative public health research: A systematic review of 20 years of literature",
abstract = "Background This study reviewed the completeness of reporting in Indian qualitative public health research (QPHR) studies using the 'Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research' (COREQ) checklist. Methods Search results from five electronic databases were screened by two independent reviewers. We included English-language, primary QPHR studies from India, which were assessed for their compliance with the COREQ checklist. Each COREQ item was noted as either reported or unreported. Descriptive statistics for the number of COREQ items reported by each study, and the number of studies that reported each COREQ item were reported, as were the items reported in each year, and in pre- A nd post-COREQ time periods. Results Of 537 citations, 246 articles were included. Trends demonstrated an increasing number of Indian QPHR studies being published annually, and an overall increase in reporting completeness since 1997. Only two COREQ items were reported in all studies. 52.4{\%} of articles reported between 16 and 21 items, corresponding to 43-57{\%} of items being reported. Six items were reported in fewer than 10{\%} of studies. COREQ domain 1 was least frequently reported. Conclusions Despite improving trends, the reporting of QPHR in India is incomplete. Authors and journals should ensure adherence to reporting guidelines.",
author = "Godinho, {Myron Anthony} and Nachiket Gudi and Maja Milkowska and Shruti Murthy and Ajay Bailey and Nair, {N. Sreekumaran}",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/pubmed/fdy122",
language = "English",
volume = "41",
pages = "405--411",
journal = "Journal of Public Health",
issn = "1741-3842",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "2",

}

Completeness of reporting in Indian qualitative public health research : A systematic review of 20 years of literature. / Godinho, Myron Anthony; Gudi, Nachiket; Milkowska, Maja; Murthy, Shruti; Bailey, Ajay; Nair, N. Sreekumaran.

In: Journal of Public Health (United Kingdom), Vol. 41, No. 2, 01.01.2019, p. 405-411.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Completeness of reporting in Indian qualitative public health research

T2 - A systematic review of 20 years of literature

AU - Godinho, Myron Anthony

AU - Gudi, Nachiket

AU - Milkowska, Maja

AU - Murthy, Shruti

AU - Bailey, Ajay

AU - Nair, N. Sreekumaran

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Background This study reviewed the completeness of reporting in Indian qualitative public health research (QPHR) studies using the 'Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research' (COREQ) checklist. Methods Search results from five electronic databases were screened by two independent reviewers. We included English-language, primary QPHR studies from India, which were assessed for their compliance with the COREQ checklist. Each COREQ item was noted as either reported or unreported. Descriptive statistics for the number of COREQ items reported by each study, and the number of studies that reported each COREQ item were reported, as were the items reported in each year, and in pre- A nd post-COREQ time periods. Results Of 537 citations, 246 articles were included. Trends demonstrated an increasing number of Indian QPHR studies being published annually, and an overall increase in reporting completeness since 1997. Only two COREQ items were reported in all studies. 52.4% of articles reported between 16 and 21 items, corresponding to 43-57% of items being reported. Six items were reported in fewer than 10% of studies. COREQ domain 1 was least frequently reported. Conclusions Despite improving trends, the reporting of QPHR in India is incomplete. Authors and journals should ensure adherence to reporting guidelines.

AB - Background This study reviewed the completeness of reporting in Indian qualitative public health research (QPHR) studies using the 'Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research' (COREQ) checklist. Methods Search results from five electronic databases were screened by two independent reviewers. We included English-language, primary QPHR studies from India, which were assessed for their compliance with the COREQ checklist. Each COREQ item was noted as either reported or unreported. Descriptive statistics for the number of COREQ items reported by each study, and the number of studies that reported each COREQ item were reported, as were the items reported in each year, and in pre- A nd post-COREQ time periods. Results Of 537 citations, 246 articles were included. Trends demonstrated an increasing number of Indian QPHR studies being published annually, and an overall increase in reporting completeness since 1997. Only two COREQ items were reported in all studies. 52.4% of articles reported between 16 and 21 items, corresponding to 43-57% of items being reported. Six items were reported in fewer than 10% of studies. COREQ domain 1 was least frequently reported. Conclusions Despite improving trends, the reporting of QPHR in India is incomplete. Authors and journals should ensure adherence to reporting guidelines.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85068011018&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85068011018&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/pubmed/fdy122

DO - 10.1093/pubmed/fdy122

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:85068011018

VL - 41

SP - 405

EP - 411

JO - Journal of Public Health

JF - Journal of Public Health

SN - 1741-3842

IS - 2

ER -