Complexity in public health interventions - Stakeholders' perspective

A qualitative analysis

N. Ravishankar, Melissa Glenda Lewis, Anusha Mujja, Suma Nair, N. Sreekumaran Nair

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Public health interventions are mostly composed of several interconnected actions and hence they are popularly referred to as "Complex". The domain of complexity lacks clarity and the conceptual framework needs to be simplified and strengthened as till date most of the issues/concepts relating to this domain remain unexplored. This paper investigates the perception about complexity among people working in the area of public health. Study design and methodology: We adopted a qualitative study design and conducted unstructured interviews/dialogues/focus group discussions among people working in the public health domain on their perception about complexity. The process was audio-recorded and the interpretations were summarised. Responses were consolidated on the basis of five major sources complexity as depicted by Medical Research Council, UK guidance. Results and conclusion: This paper provides an outlook of people on how they perceive the complexity in public health interventions. Participants perceived complexity in a diverse manner which was evident from the varying responses obtained. Therefore there is a need for a strong theoretical base to understand complexity and also a concrete methodological framework to tackle it. The external validity of a public health research can be seriously affected in presence of complexity. Therefore it is necessary to adopt effective strategies to tackle complexity to obtain valid results.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)72-76
Number of pages5
JournalClinical Epidemiology and Global Health
Volume3
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01-08-2015

Fingerprint

Public Health
Public Sector
Focus Groups
Biomedical Research
Interviews
Research

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Epidemiology
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Infectious Diseases
  • Microbiology (medical)

Cite this

Ravishankar, N. ; Lewis, Melissa Glenda ; Mujja, Anusha ; Nair, Suma ; Sreekumaran Nair, N. / Complexity in public health interventions - Stakeholders' perspective : A qualitative analysis. In: Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health. 2015 ; Vol. 3, No. 2. pp. 72-76.
@article{8114cbf80e2c46efb1a4936c78f09cc2,
title = "Complexity in public health interventions - Stakeholders' perspective: A qualitative analysis",
abstract = "Background: Public health interventions are mostly composed of several interconnected actions and hence they are popularly referred to as {"}Complex{"}. The domain of complexity lacks clarity and the conceptual framework needs to be simplified and strengthened as till date most of the issues/concepts relating to this domain remain unexplored. This paper investigates the perception about complexity among people working in the area of public health. Study design and methodology: We adopted a qualitative study design and conducted unstructured interviews/dialogues/focus group discussions among people working in the public health domain on their perception about complexity. The process was audio-recorded and the interpretations were summarised. Responses were consolidated on the basis of five major sources complexity as depicted by Medical Research Council, UK guidance. Results and conclusion: This paper provides an outlook of people on how they perceive the complexity in public health interventions. Participants perceived complexity in a diverse manner which was evident from the varying responses obtained. Therefore there is a need for a strong theoretical base to understand complexity and also a concrete methodological framework to tackle it. The external validity of a public health research can be seriously affected in presence of complexity. Therefore it is necessary to adopt effective strategies to tackle complexity to obtain valid results.",
author = "N. Ravishankar and Lewis, {Melissa Glenda} and Anusha Mujja and Suma Nair and {Sreekumaran Nair}, N.",
year = "2015",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.cegh.2014.08.002",
language = "English",
volume = "3",
pages = "72--76",
journal = "Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health",
issn = "2213-3984",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "2",

}

Complexity in public health interventions - Stakeholders' perspective : A qualitative analysis. / Ravishankar, N.; Lewis, Melissa Glenda; Mujja, Anusha; Nair, Suma; Sreekumaran Nair, N.

In: Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health, Vol. 3, No. 2, 01.08.2015, p. 72-76.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Complexity in public health interventions - Stakeholders' perspective

T2 - A qualitative analysis

AU - Ravishankar, N.

AU - Lewis, Melissa Glenda

AU - Mujja, Anusha

AU - Nair, Suma

AU - Sreekumaran Nair, N.

PY - 2015/8/1

Y1 - 2015/8/1

N2 - Background: Public health interventions are mostly composed of several interconnected actions and hence they are popularly referred to as "Complex". The domain of complexity lacks clarity and the conceptual framework needs to be simplified and strengthened as till date most of the issues/concepts relating to this domain remain unexplored. This paper investigates the perception about complexity among people working in the area of public health. Study design and methodology: We adopted a qualitative study design and conducted unstructured interviews/dialogues/focus group discussions among people working in the public health domain on their perception about complexity. The process was audio-recorded and the interpretations were summarised. Responses were consolidated on the basis of five major sources complexity as depicted by Medical Research Council, UK guidance. Results and conclusion: This paper provides an outlook of people on how they perceive the complexity in public health interventions. Participants perceived complexity in a diverse manner which was evident from the varying responses obtained. Therefore there is a need for a strong theoretical base to understand complexity and also a concrete methodological framework to tackle it. The external validity of a public health research can be seriously affected in presence of complexity. Therefore it is necessary to adopt effective strategies to tackle complexity to obtain valid results.

AB - Background: Public health interventions are mostly composed of several interconnected actions and hence they are popularly referred to as "Complex". The domain of complexity lacks clarity and the conceptual framework needs to be simplified and strengthened as till date most of the issues/concepts relating to this domain remain unexplored. This paper investigates the perception about complexity among people working in the area of public health. Study design and methodology: We adopted a qualitative study design and conducted unstructured interviews/dialogues/focus group discussions among people working in the public health domain on their perception about complexity. The process was audio-recorded and the interpretations were summarised. Responses were consolidated on the basis of five major sources complexity as depicted by Medical Research Council, UK guidance. Results and conclusion: This paper provides an outlook of people on how they perceive the complexity in public health interventions. Participants perceived complexity in a diverse manner which was evident from the varying responses obtained. Therefore there is a need for a strong theoretical base to understand complexity and also a concrete methodological framework to tackle it. The external validity of a public health research can be seriously affected in presence of complexity. Therefore it is necessary to adopt effective strategies to tackle complexity to obtain valid results.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84964194151&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84964194151&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.cegh.2014.08.002

DO - 10.1016/j.cegh.2014.08.002

M3 - Article

VL - 3

SP - 72

EP - 76

JO - Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health

JF - Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health

SN - 2213-3984

IS - 2

ER -