Computational fluid dynamics study of pull and plug flow boundary condition on nasal airflow

Mohammed Zubair, Vizy Nazira Riazuddin, Mohammad Zulkifly Abdullah, Ismail Rushdan, Ibrahim Lutfi Shuaib, Kamarul Arifin Ahmad

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The recent advances in the computer based computational fluid dynamics (CFD) software tools in the study of airflow behavior in the nasal cavity have opened an entirely new field of medical research. This numerical modeling method has provided both engineers and medical specialists with a clearer understanding of the physics associated with the flow in the complicated nasal domain. The outcome of any CFD investigation depends on the appropriateness of the boundary conditions applied. Most researchers have employed plug boundary condition as against the pull flow which closely resembles the physiological phenomenon associated with the breathing mechanism. A comparative study on the effect of using the plug and pull flow boundary conditions are evaluated and their effect on the nasal flow are studied. Discretization error estimation using Richardson's extrapolation (RE) method has also been carried out. The study is based on the numerical model obtained from computed tomographic data of a healthy Malaysian subject. A steady state Reynold averaged Navier-Stokes and continuity equations is solved for inspiratory flow having flow rate 20 L/min representing turbulent boundary conditions. Comparative study is made between the pull and plug flow model. Variation in flow patterns and flow features such as resistance, pressure and velocity are presented. At the nasal valve, the resistance for plug flow is 0.664 Pa-min/L and for pull flow the value is 0.304 Pa-min/L. The maximum velocity at the nasal valve is 3.28 m/s for plug flow and 3.57 m/s for pull flow model.

Original languageEnglish
Article number1350044
JournalBiomedical Engineering - Applications, Basis and Communications
Volume25
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 08-2013

Fingerprint

Hydrodynamics
Nose
Computational fluid dynamics
Boundary conditions
Physiological Phenomena
Nasal Cavity
Physics
Extrapolation
Flow patterns
Error analysis
Biomedical Research
Numerical models
Healthy Volunteers
Respiration
Software
Flow rate
Research Personnel
Pressure
Engineers

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Bioengineering
  • Biophysics
  • Biomedical Engineering

Cite this

Zubair, Mohammed ; Riazuddin, Vizy Nazira ; Abdullah, Mohammad Zulkifly ; Rushdan, Ismail ; Shuaib, Ibrahim Lutfi ; Ahmad, Kamarul Arifin. / Computational fluid dynamics study of pull and plug flow boundary condition on nasal airflow. In: Biomedical Engineering - Applications, Basis and Communications. 2013 ; Vol. 25, No. 4.
@article{acd71085adaf4dc7b814ba1970693134,
title = "Computational fluid dynamics study of pull and plug flow boundary condition on nasal airflow",
abstract = "The recent advances in the computer based computational fluid dynamics (CFD) software tools in the study of airflow behavior in the nasal cavity have opened an entirely new field of medical research. This numerical modeling method has provided both engineers and medical specialists with a clearer understanding of the physics associated with the flow in the complicated nasal domain. The outcome of any CFD investigation depends on the appropriateness of the boundary conditions applied. Most researchers have employed plug boundary condition as against the pull flow which closely resembles the physiological phenomenon associated with the breathing mechanism. A comparative study on the effect of using the plug and pull flow boundary conditions are evaluated and their effect on the nasal flow are studied. Discretization error estimation using Richardson's extrapolation (RE) method has also been carried out. The study is based on the numerical model obtained from computed tomographic data of a healthy Malaysian subject. A steady state Reynold averaged Navier-Stokes and continuity equations is solved for inspiratory flow having flow rate 20 L/min representing turbulent boundary conditions. Comparative study is made between the pull and plug flow model. Variation in flow patterns and flow features such as resistance, pressure and velocity are presented. At the nasal valve, the resistance for plug flow is 0.664 Pa-min/L and for pull flow the value is 0.304 Pa-min/L. The maximum velocity at the nasal valve is 3.28 m/s for plug flow and 3.57 m/s for pull flow model.",
author = "Mohammed Zubair and Riazuddin, {Vizy Nazira} and Abdullah, {Mohammad Zulkifly} and Ismail Rushdan and Shuaib, {Ibrahim Lutfi} and Ahmad, {Kamarul Arifin}",
year = "2013",
month = "8",
doi = "10.4015/S1016237213500440",
language = "English",
volume = "25",
journal = "Biomedical Engineering - Applications, Basis and Communications",
issn = "1016-2372",
publisher = "World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte Ltd",
number = "4",

}

Computational fluid dynamics study of pull and plug flow boundary condition on nasal airflow. / Zubair, Mohammed; Riazuddin, Vizy Nazira; Abdullah, Mohammad Zulkifly; Rushdan, Ismail; Shuaib, Ibrahim Lutfi; Ahmad, Kamarul Arifin.

In: Biomedical Engineering - Applications, Basis and Communications, Vol. 25, No. 4, 1350044, 08.2013.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Computational fluid dynamics study of pull and plug flow boundary condition on nasal airflow

AU - Zubair, Mohammed

AU - Riazuddin, Vizy Nazira

AU - Abdullah, Mohammad Zulkifly

AU - Rushdan, Ismail

AU - Shuaib, Ibrahim Lutfi

AU - Ahmad, Kamarul Arifin

PY - 2013/8

Y1 - 2013/8

N2 - The recent advances in the computer based computational fluid dynamics (CFD) software tools in the study of airflow behavior in the nasal cavity have opened an entirely new field of medical research. This numerical modeling method has provided both engineers and medical specialists with a clearer understanding of the physics associated with the flow in the complicated nasal domain. The outcome of any CFD investigation depends on the appropriateness of the boundary conditions applied. Most researchers have employed plug boundary condition as against the pull flow which closely resembles the physiological phenomenon associated with the breathing mechanism. A comparative study on the effect of using the plug and pull flow boundary conditions are evaluated and their effect on the nasal flow are studied. Discretization error estimation using Richardson's extrapolation (RE) method has also been carried out. The study is based on the numerical model obtained from computed tomographic data of a healthy Malaysian subject. A steady state Reynold averaged Navier-Stokes and continuity equations is solved for inspiratory flow having flow rate 20 L/min representing turbulent boundary conditions. Comparative study is made between the pull and plug flow model. Variation in flow patterns and flow features such as resistance, pressure and velocity are presented. At the nasal valve, the resistance for plug flow is 0.664 Pa-min/L and for pull flow the value is 0.304 Pa-min/L. The maximum velocity at the nasal valve is 3.28 m/s for plug flow and 3.57 m/s for pull flow model.

AB - The recent advances in the computer based computational fluid dynamics (CFD) software tools in the study of airflow behavior in the nasal cavity have opened an entirely new field of medical research. This numerical modeling method has provided both engineers and medical specialists with a clearer understanding of the physics associated with the flow in the complicated nasal domain. The outcome of any CFD investigation depends on the appropriateness of the boundary conditions applied. Most researchers have employed plug boundary condition as against the pull flow which closely resembles the physiological phenomenon associated with the breathing mechanism. A comparative study on the effect of using the plug and pull flow boundary conditions are evaluated and their effect on the nasal flow are studied. Discretization error estimation using Richardson's extrapolation (RE) method has also been carried out. The study is based on the numerical model obtained from computed tomographic data of a healthy Malaysian subject. A steady state Reynold averaged Navier-Stokes and continuity equations is solved for inspiratory flow having flow rate 20 L/min representing turbulent boundary conditions. Comparative study is made between the pull and plug flow model. Variation in flow patterns and flow features such as resistance, pressure and velocity are presented. At the nasal valve, the resistance for plug flow is 0.664 Pa-min/L and for pull flow the value is 0.304 Pa-min/L. The maximum velocity at the nasal valve is 3.28 m/s for plug flow and 3.57 m/s for pull flow model.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84883091434&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84883091434&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4015/S1016237213500440

DO - 10.4015/S1016237213500440

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84883091434

VL - 25

JO - Biomedical Engineering - Applications, Basis and Communications

JF - Biomedical Engineering - Applications, Basis and Communications

SN - 1016-2372

IS - 4

M1 - 1350044

ER -