Concurrent vowel identification and speech perception in noise in individuals with cochlear hearing loss

U. Ajith Kumar, Praveen Rayanagoudar, Arivudai Nambi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Previous studies have indicated that individuals with cochlear hearing loss perform poorly in concurrent vowel identification task. This indicates that individuals with cochlear hearing loss do not use F0 cues to segregate two acoustic streams, as much as normal hearing individuals do. However, which of vowel features (place, tongue height etc.,) are better transmitted when the F0s of two concurrently presented vowels are varied is not known. Moreover, the contribution of stream segregation abilities in understanding of speech in the presence of competing signal is also not clear. Hence, this study aimed to evaluate the relationship between concurrent vowel identification scores and speech perception abilities in noise in individuals with cochlear hearing loss and compared that to normal hearing individuals. Specifically, we measured the identification of vowels /e/, /i/, /o/ and /u/ when vowel /a/ was presented simultaneously as a competing stimulus in 14 individuals with normal hearing and 15 individuals with cochlear hearing loss. Vowel identification scores were measured in four conditions: with 0 semitone difference between fundamental frequencies of concurrent vowels, with 1 semitone, 2 semitone and 4 semitone difference in the fundamental frequencies of concurrent vowels. Signal to noise ratio required to identify 50% of presented speech (SNR-50) in presence of four talker babble was also measured using standardized sentence list. Furthermore, relationship between concurrent vowel identification and SNR-50 was also evaluated. The results of the present study showed that individuals with cochlear hearing loss had poorer concurrent vowel identification scores compared to the normal hearing group, especially in 0 semitone difference condition. There were significant correlations between concurrent vowel identification scores and SNR-50 indicating, differences in the F0 are one of the most robust cues for stream segregation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)952-959
Number of pages8
JournalActa Acustica united with Acustica
Volume99
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 11-2013

Fingerprint

auditory defects
vowels
hearing
cues
Speech Perception
Hearing Impairment
Semitone
sentences
tongue
Signal-to-noise Ratio
Hearing
lists
stimuli
signal to noise ratios

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Music
  • Acoustics and Ultrasonics

Cite this

Kumar, U. Ajith ; Rayanagoudar, Praveen ; Nambi, Arivudai. / Concurrent vowel identification and speech perception in noise in individuals with cochlear hearing loss. In: Acta Acustica united with Acustica. 2013 ; Vol. 99, No. 6. pp. 952-959.
@article{6fc84229cef042cd9bd511ed69c0e7fe,
title = "Concurrent vowel identification and speech perception in noise in individuals with cochlear hearing loss",
abstract = "Previous studies have indicated that individuals with cochlear hearing loss perform poorly in concurrent vowel identification task. This indicates that individuals with cochlear hearing loss do not use F0 cues to segregate two acoustic streams, as much as normal hearing individuals do. However, which of vowel features (place, tongue height etc.,) are better transmitted when the F0s of two concurrently presented vowels are varied is not known. Moreover, the contribution of stream segregation abilities in understanding of speech in the presence of competing signal is also not clear. Hence, this study aimed to evaluate the relationship between concurrent vowel identification scores and speech perception abilities in noise in individuals with cochlear hearing loss and compared that to normal hearing individuals. Specifically, we measured the identification of vowels /e/, /i/, /o/ and /u/ when vowel /a/ was presented simultaneously as a competing stimulus in 14 individuals with normal hearing and 15 individuals with cochlear hearing loss. Vowel identification scores were measured in four conditions: with 0 semitone difference between fundamental frequencies of concurrent vowels, with 1 semitone, 2 semitone and 4 semitone difference in the fundamental frequencies of concurrent vowels. Signal to noise ratio required to identify 50{\%} of presented speech (SNR-50) in presence of four talker babble was also measured using standardized sentence list. Furthermore, relationship between concurrent vowel identification and SNR-50 was also evaluated. The results of the present study showed that individuals with cochlear hearing loss had poorer concurrent vowel identification scores compared to the normal hearing group, especially in 0 semitone difference condition. There were significant correlations between concurrent vowel identification scores and SNR-50 indicating, differences in the F0 are one of the most robust cues for stream segregation.",
author = "Kumar, {U. Ajith} and Praveen Rayanagoudar and Arivudai Nambi",
year = "2013",
month = "11",
doi = "10.3813/AAA.918674",
language = "English",
volume = "99",
pages = "952--959",
journal = "Acta Acustica united with Acustica",
issn = "1436-7947",
publisher = "S. Hirzel Verlag GmbH",
number = "6",

}

Concurrent vowel identification and speech perception in noise in individuals with cochlear hearing loss. / Kumar, U. Ajith; Rayanagoudar, Praveen; Nambi, Arivudai.

In: Acta Acustica united with Acustica, Vol. 99, No. 6, 11.2013, p. 952-959.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Concurrent vowel identification and speech perception in noise in individuals with cochlear hearing loss

AU - Kumar, U. Ajith

AU - Rayanagoudar, Praveen

AU - Nambi, Arivudai

PY - 2013/11

Y1 - 2013/11

N2 - Previous studies have indicated that individuals with cochlear hearing loss perform poorly in concurrent vowel identification task. This indicates that individuals with cochlear hearing loss do not use F0 cues to segregate two acoustic streams, as much as normal hearing individuals do. However, which of vowel features (place, tongue height etc.,) are better transmitted when the F0s of two concurrently presented vowels are varied is not known. Moreover, the contribution of stream segregation abilities in understanding of speech in the presence of competing signal is also not clear. Hence, this study aimed to evaluate the relationship between concurrent vowel identification scores and speech perception abilities in noise in individuals with cochlear hearing loss and compared that to normal hearing individuals. Specifically, we measured the identification of vowels /e/, /i/, /o/ and /u/ when vowel /a/ was presented simultaneously as a competing stimulus in 14 individuals with normal hearing and 15 individuals with cochlear hearing loss. Vowel identification scores were measured in four conditions: with 0 semitone difference between fundamental frequencies of concurrent vowels, with 1 semitone, 2 semitone and 4 semitone difference in the fundamental frequencies of concurrent vowels. Signal to noise ratio required to identify 50% of presented speech (SNR-50) in presence of four talker babble was also measured using standardized sentence list. Furthermore, relationship between concurrent vowel identification and SNR-50 was also evaluated. The results of the present study showed that individuals with cochlear hearing loss had poorer concurrent vowel identification scores compared to the normal hearing group, especially in 0 semitone difference condition. There were significant correlations between concurrent vowel identification scores and SNR-50 indicating, differences in the F0 are one of the most robust cues for stream segregation.

AB - Previous studies have indicated that individuals with cochlear hearing loss perform poorly in concurrent vowel identification task. This indicates that individuals with cochlear hearing loss do not use F0 cues to segregate two acoustic streams, as much as normal hearing individuals do. However, which of vowel features (place, tongue height etc.,) are better transmitted when the F0s of two concurrently presented vowels are varied is not known. Moreover, the contribution of stream segregation abilities in understanding of speech in the presence of competing signal is also not clear. Hence, this study aimed to evaluate the relationship between concurrent vowel identification scores and speech perception abilities in noise in individuals with cochlear hearing loss and compared that to normal hearing individuals. Specifically, we measured the identification of vowels /e/, /i/, /o/ and /u/ when vowel /a/ was presented simultaneously as a competing stimulus in 14 individuals with normal hearing and 15 individuals with cochlear hearing loss. Vowel identification scores were measured in four conditions: with 0 semitone difference between fundamental frequencies of concurrent vowels, with 1 semitone, 2 semitone and 4 semitone difference in the fundamental frequencies of concurrent vowels. Signal to noise ratio required to identify 50% of presented speech (SNR-50) in presence of four talker babble was also measured using standardized sentence list. Furthermore, relationship between concurrent vowel identification and SNR-50 was also evaluated. The results of the present study showed that individuals with cochlear hearing loss had poorer concurrent vowel identification scores compared to the normal hearing group, especially in 0 semitone difference condition. There were significant correlations between concurrent vowel identification scores and SNR-50 indicating, differences in the F0 are one of the most robust cues for stream segregation.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84888351718&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84888351718&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3813/AAA.918674

DO - 10.3813/AAA.918674

M3 - Article

VL - 99

SP - 952

EP - 959

JO - Acta Acustica united with Acustica

JF - Acta Acustica united with Acustica

SN - 1436-7947

IS - 6

ER -