Conservative approach in gynecologic malignancies

Guruvare Shyamala

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

Objective: This review was undertaken with the purpose of highlighting the options of a conservative approach in the management of gynecologic cancers so that clinicians exhibit some restraint before deciding on extensive surgeries as the management option. Background: Ovarian function and fertility are the main concerns while treating young women with gynecologic cancers. A conservative approach in management addresses these issues and aims at preserving the uterus and/or ovarian tissue. Early cervical and endometrial cancers, germ cell ovarian tumors, borderline ovarian tumors, and even early epithelial ovarian tumors are the gynecologic cancers where there is scope for a conservative approach. It may be in the form of radical trachelectomy for cervical cancer, medical (hormonal) treatment for endometrial carcinoma, or uterus/ovary-preserving surgeries for ovarian malignancies. On other end of the spectrum, there are advanced malignancies that may require extensive surgeries, which may further add to the morbidity. A less radical approach is in vogue in advanced ovarian malignancies where neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval surgery is practiced instead of extensive primary debulking surgery. Similarly, the concept of sentinel lymph node sampling avoids unnecessary extensive lymphadenectomy in cervical cancers. Methods: A detailed literature search was made entering the terms conservative, fertility sparing, germ cell, borderline, epithelial, ovarian, trachelectomy, cervical, endometrial, neoadjuvant, and chemotherapy. Conclusions: Each relevant identified article was reviewed and a detailed overview of conservative options while managing gynecological malignancies is made.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)151-161
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Gynecologic Surgery
Volume26
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01-06-2010
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Neoplasms
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms
Endometrial Neoplasms
Uterus
Fertility
Drug Therapy
Germ Cell and Embryonal Neoplasms
Lymph Node Excision
Germ Cells
Ovary
Morbidity
Trachelectomy
Therapeutics

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Obstetrics and Gynaecology
  • Surgery

Cite this

Shyamala, Guruvare. / Conservative approach in gynecologic malignancies. In: Journal of Gynecologic Surgery. 2010 ; Vol. 26, No. 2. pp. 151-161.
@article{97d9f273b9c64a4b94527594d84f984a,
title = "Conservative approach in gynecologic malignancies",
abstract = "Objective: This review was undertaken with the purpose of highlighting the options of a conservative approach in the management of gynecologic cancers so that clinicians exhibit some restraint before deciding on extensive surgeries as the management option. Background: Ovarian function and fertility are the main concerns while treating young women with gynecologic cancers. A conservative approach in management addresses these issues and aims at preserving the uterus and/or ovarian tissue. Early cervical and endometrial cancers, germ cell ovarian tumors, borderline ovarian tumors, and even early epithelial ovarian tumors are the gynecologic cancers where there is scope for a conservative approach. It may be in the form of radical trachelectomy for cervical cancer, medical (hormonal) treatment for endometrial carcinoma, or uterus/ovary-preserving surgeries for ovarian malignancies. On other end of the spectrum, there are advanced malignancies that may require extensive surgeries, which may further add to the morbidity. A less radical approach is in vogue in advanced ovarian malignancies where neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval surgery is practiced instead of extensive primary debulking surgery. Similarly, the concept of sentinel lymph node sampling avoids unnecessary extensive lymphadenectomy in cervical cancers. Methods: A detailed literature search was made entering the terms conservative, fertility sparing, germ cell, borderline, epithelial, ovarian, trachelectomy, cervical, endometrial, neoadjuvant, and chemotherapy. Conclusions: Each relevant identified article was reviewed and a detailed overview of conservative options while managing gynecological malignancies is made.",
author = "Guruvare Shyamala",
year = "2010",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1089/gyn.2009.0055",
language = "English",
volume = "26",
pages = "151--161",
journal = "Journal of Gynecologic Surgery",
issn = "1042-4067",
publisher = "Mary Ann Liebert Inc.",
number = "2",

}

Conservative approach in gynecologic malignancies. / Shyamala, Guruvare.

In: Journal of Gynecologic Surgery, Vol. 26, No. 2, 01.06.2010, p. 151-161.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Conservative approach in gynecologic malignancies

AU - Shyamala, Guruvare

PY - 2010/6/1

Y1 - 2010/6/1

N2 - Objective: This review was undertaken with the purpose of highlighting the options of a conservative approach in the management of gynecologic cancers so that clinicians exhibit some restraint before deciding on extensive surgeries as the management option. Background: Ovarian function and fertility are the main concerns while treating young women with gynecologic cancers. A conservative approach in management addresses these issues and aims at preserving the uterus and/or ovarian tissue. Early cervical and endometrial cancers, germ cell ovarian tumors, borderline ovarian tumors, and even early epithelial ovarian tumors are the gynecologic cancers where there is scope for a conservative approach. It may be in the form of radical trachelectomy for cervical cancer, medical (hormonal) treatment for endometrial carcinoma, or uterus/ovary-preserving surgeries for ovarian malignancies. On other end of the spectrum, there are advanced malignancies that may require extensive surgeries, which may further add to the morbidity. A less radical approach is in vogue in advanced ovarian malignancies where neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval surgery is practiced instead of extensive primary debulking surgery. Similarly, the concept of sentinel lymph node sampling avoids unnecessary extensive lymphadenectomy in cervical cancers. Methods: A detailed literature search was made entering the terms conservative, fertility sparing, germ cell, borderline, epithelial, ovarian, trachelectomy, cervical, endometrial, neoadjuvant, and chemotherapy. Conclusions: Each relevant identified article was reviewed and a detailed overview of conservative options while managing gynecological malignancies is made.

AB - Objective: This review was undertaken with the purpose of highlighting the options of a conservative approach in the management of gynecologic cancers so that clinicians exhibit some restraint before deciding on extensive surgeries as the management option. Background: Ovarian function and fertility are the main concerns while treating young women with gynecologic cancers. A conservative approach in management addresses these issues and aims at preserving the uterus and/or ovarian tissue. Early cervical and endometrial cancers, germ cell ovarian tumors, borderline ovarian tumors, and even early epithelial ovarian tumors are the gynecologic cancers where there is scope for a conservative approach. It may be in the form of radical trachelectomy for cervical cancer, medical (hormonal) treatment for endometrial carcinoma, or uterus/ovary-preserving surgeries for ovarian malignancies. On other end of the spectrum, there are advanced malignancies that may require extensive surgeries, which may further add to the morbidity. A less radical approach is in vogue in advanced ovarian malignancies where neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval surgery is practiced instead of extensive primary debulking surgery. Similarly, the concept of sentinel lymph node sampling avoids unnecessary extensive lymphadenectomy in cervical cancers. Methods: A detailed literature search was made entering the terms conservative, fertility sparing, germ cell, borderline, epithelial, ovarian, trachelectomy, cervical, endometrial, neoadjuvant, and chemotherapy. Conclusions: Each relevant identified article was reviewed and a detailed overview of conservative options while managing gynecological malignancies is made.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77953633722&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77953633722&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1089/gyn.2009.0055

DO - 10.1089/gyn.2009.0055

M3 - Review article

VL - 26

SP - 151

EP - 161

JO - Journal of Gynecologic Surgery

JF - Journal of Gynecologic Surgery

SN - 1042-4067

IS - 2

ER -