Craniofacial displacement in response to varying headgear forces evaluated biomechanically with finite element analysis

Pawan Gautam, Ashima Valiathan, Raviraj Adhikari

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction: The aim of this study was to evaluate biomechanically the displacement patterns of the facial bones in response to different headgear loading by using a higher-resolution finite element method model than used in previous studies. Methods: An analytical model was developed from sequential computed tomography scan images taken at 2.5-mm intervals of a dry skull of a 7-year-old. Different headgear forces were simulated by applying 1 kg of posteriorly directed force in the first molar region to simulate cervical-pull, straight-pull, and high-pull headgear. Displacements (in mm) of various craniofacial structures were evaluated along the x, y, and z coordinates with different headgear loading. Results: All 3 headgears demonstrated posterior displacement of the maxilla with clockwise rotation of the palatal plane. The distal displacement of the maxilla was the greatest with the straight-pull headgear followed by the cervical-pull headgear. The high-pull headgear had better control in the vertical dimensions. The midpalatal suture opening was evident and was more pronounced in the anterior region. The articular fossa and the articular eminence were displaced laterally and postero-superiorly with each headgear type. Conclusions: The high-pull headgear was most effective in restricting the antero-inferior maxillary growth vector. Midpalatal suture opening similar to rapid maxillary expansion was observed with all 3 headgear types. The center of rotation varied with the direction of headgear forces for both the maxilla and the zygomatic complex. A potential for chondrogenic and osteogenic modeling exists for the articular fossa and the articular eminence with headgear loading.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)507-515
Number of pages9
JournalAmerican Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
Volume135
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01-04-2009

Fingerprint

Finite Element Analysis
Maxilla
Joints
Sutures
Palatal Expansion Technique
Facial Bones
Vertical Dimension
Skull
Tomography
Growth

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Orthodontics

Cite this

@article{6f507c463a464140b4974060784e6d91,
title = "Craniofacial displacement in response to varying headgear forces evaluated biomechanically with finite element analysis",
abstract = "Introduction: The aim of this study was to evaluate biomechanically the displacement patterns of the facial bones in response to different headgear loading by using a higher-resolution finite element method model than used in previous studies. Methods: An analytical model was developed from sequential computed tomography scan images taken at 2.5-mm intervals of a dry skull of a 7-year-old. Different headgear forces were simulated by applying 1 kg of posteriorly directed force in the first molar region to simulate cervical-pull, straight-pull, and high-pull headgear. Displacements (in mm) of various craniofacial structures were evaluated along the x, y, and z coordinates with different headgear loading. Results: All 3 headgears demonstrated posterior displacement of the maxilla with clockwise rotation of the palatal plane. The distal displacement of the maxilla was the greatest with the straight-pull headgear followed by the cervical-pull headgear. The high-pull headgear had better control in the vertical dimensions. The midpalatal suture opening was evident and was more pronounced in the anterior region. The articular fossa and the articular eminence were displaced laterally and postero-superiorly with each headgear type. Conclusions: The high-pull headgear was most effective in restricting the antero-inferior maxillary growth vector. Midpalatal suture opening similar to rapid maxillary expansion was observed with all 3 headgear types. The center of rotation varied with the direction of headgear forces for both the maxilla and the zygomatic complex. A potential for chondrogenic and osteogenic modeling exists for the articular fossa and the articular eminence with headgear loading.",
author = "Pawan Gautam and Ashima Valiathan and Raviraj Adhikari",
year = "2009",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.02.059",
language = "English",
volume = "135",
pages = "507--515",
journal = "American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics",
issn = "0889-5406",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "4",

}

Craniofacial displacement in response to varying headgear forces evaluated biomechanically with finite element analysis. / Gautam, Pawan; Valiathan, Ashima; Adhikari, Raviraj.

In: American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Vol. 135, No. 4, 01.04.2009, p. 507-515.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Craniofacial displacement in response to varying headgear forces evaluated biomechanically with finite element analysis

AU - Gautam, Pawan

AU - Valiathan, Ashima

AU - Adhikari, Raviraj

PY - 2009/4/1

Y1 - 2009/4/1

N2 - Introduction: The aim of this study was to evaluate biomechanically the displacement patterns of the facial bones in response to different headgear loading by using a higher-resolution finite element method model than used in previous studies. Methods: An analytical model was developed from sequential computed tomography scan images taken at 2.5-mm intervals of a dry skull of a 7-year-old. Different headgear forces were simulated by applying 1 kg of posteriorly directed force in the first molar region to simulate cervical-pull, straight-pull, and high-pull headgear. Displacements (in mm) of various craniofacial structures were evaluated along the x, y, and z coordinates with different headgear loading. Results: All 3 headgears demonstrated posterior displacement of the maxilla with clockwise rotation of the palatal plane. The distal displacement of the maxilla was the greatest with the straight-pull headgear followed by the cervical-pull headgear. The high-pull headgear had better control in the vertical dimensions. The midpalatal suture opening was evident and was more pronounced in the anterior region. The articular fossa and the articular eminence were displaced laterally and postero-superiorly with each headgear type. Conclusions: The high-pull headgear was most effective in restricting the antero-inferior maxillary growth vector. Midpalatal suture opening similar to rapid maxillary expansion was observed with all 3 headgear types. The center of rotation varied with the direction of headgear forces for both the maxilla and the zygomatic complex. A potential for chondrogenic and osteogenic modeling exists for the articular fossa and the articular eminence with headgear loading.

AB - Introduction: The aim of this study was to evaluate biomechanically the displacement patterns of the facial bones in response to different headgear loading by using a higher-resolution finite element method model than used in previous studies. Methods: An analytical model was developed from sequential computed tomography scan images taken at 2.5-mm intervals of a dry skull of a 7-year-old. Different headgear forces were simulated by applying 1 kg of posteriorly directed force in the first molar region to simulate cervical-pull, straight-pull, and high-pull headgear. Displacements (in mm) of various craniofacial structures were evaluated along the x, y, and z coordinates with different headgear loading. Results: All 3 headgears demonstrated posterior displacement of the maxilla with clockwise rotation of the palatal plane. The distal displacement of the maxilla was the greatest with the straight-pull headgear followed by the cervical-pull headgear. The high-pull headgear had better control in the vertical dimensions. The midpalatal suture opening was evident and was more pronounced in the anterior region. The articular fossa and the articular eminence were displaced laterally and postero-superiorly with each headgear type. Conclusions: The high-pull headgear was most effective in restricting the antero-inferior maxillary growth vector. Midpalatal suture opening similar to rapid maxillary expansion was observed with all 3 headgear types. The center of rotation varied with the direction of headgear forces for both the maxilla and the zygomatic complex. A potential for chondrogenic and osteogenic modeling exists for the articular fossa and the articular eminence with headgear loading.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=63749108339&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=63749108339&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.02.059

DO - 10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.02.059

M3 - Article

VL - 135

SP - 507

EP - 515

JO - American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics

JF - American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics

SN - 0889-5406

IS - 4

ER -