Defining acute-on-chronic liver failure

East, West or Middle ground?

Harneet Singh, C. Ganesh Pai

Research output: Contribution to journalEditorial

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF), a newly recognized clinical entity seen in hospitalized patients with chronic liver disease including cirrhosis, is associated with high short- and medium term morbidity and mortality. None of the definitions of ACLF proposed so far have been universally accepted, the two most commonly used being those proposed by the Asia-Pacific Association for the Study of Liver (APASL) and the European Association for the Study of Liver - Chronic Liver Failure (EASL-CLIF) consortium. On paper both definitions and diagnostic criteria appear to be different from each other, reflecting the differences in cut-off values for individual parameters used in diagnosis, the acute insult or precipitating event and the underlying chronic liver disease. Data directly comparing these two criteria are limited, and available studies reveal different outcomes when the two are applied to the same set of patients. However a review of the literature suggests that both definitions do not seem to identify the same set of patients. The definition given by the APASL consortium is easier to apply in day-to-day practice but the EASL-CLIF criteria appear to better predict mortality in ACLF. The World Gastroenterology Organization working party have proposed a working definition of ACLF which will identify patients from whom relevant data can be collected so that the similarities and the differences between the two regions, if any, can be clearly defined.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2571-2577
Number of pages7
JournalWorld Journal of Hepatology
Volume7
Issue number25
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01-01-2015

Fingerprint

End Stage Liver Disease
Liver
Liver Diseases
Chronic Disease
Mortality
Gastroenterology
Fibrosis
Organizations
Morbidity
Acute-On-Chronic Liver Failure

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Hepatology

Cite this

@article{96b5fb3d7a5348718dd99ea56598d487,
title = "Defining acute-on-chronic liver failure: East, West or Middle ground?",
abstract = "Acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF), a newly recognized clinical entity seen in hospitalized patients with chronic liver disease including cirrhosis, is associated with high short- and medium term morbidity and mortality. None of the definitions of ACLF proposed so far have been universally accepted, the two most commonly used being those proposed by the Asia-Pacific Association for the Study of Liver (APASL) and the European Association for the Study of Liver - Chronic Liver Failure (EASL-CLIF) consortium. On paper both definitions and diagnostic criteria appear to be different from each other, reflecting the differences in cut-off values for individual parameters used in diagnosis, the acute insult or precipitating event and the underlying chronic liver disease. Data directly comparing these two criteria are limited, and available studies reveal different outcomes when the two are applied to the same set of patients. However a review of the literature suggests that both definitions do not seem to identify the same set of patients. The definition given by the APASL consortium is easier to apply in day-to-day practice but the EASL-CLIF criteria appear to better predict mortality in ACLF. The World Gastroenterology Organization working party have proposed a working definition of ACLF which will identify patients from whom relevant data can be collected so that the similarities and the differences between the two regions, if any, can be clearly defined.",
author = "Harneet Singh and Pai, {C. Ganesh}",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.4254/wjh.v7.i25.2571",
language = "English",
volume = "7",
pages = "2571--2577",
journal = "World Journal of Hepatology",
issn = "1948-5182",
publisher = "Baishideng Publishing Group",
number = "25",

}

Defining acute-on-chronic liver failure : East, West or Middle ground? / Singh, Harneet; Pai, C. Ganesh.

In: World Journal of Hepatology, Vol. 7, No. 25, 01.01.2015, p. 2571-2577.

Research output: Contribution to journalEditorial

TY - JOUR

T1 - Defining acute-on-chronic liver failure

T2 - East, West or Middle ground?

AU - Singh, Harneet

AU - Pai, C. Ganesh

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - Acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF), a newly recognized clinical entity seen in hospitalized patients with chronic liver disease including cirrhosis, is associated with high short- and medium term morbidity and mortality. None of the definitions of ACLF proposed so far have been universally accepted, the two most commonly used being those proposed by the Asia-Pacific Association for the Study of Liver (APASL) and the European Association for the Study of Liver - Chronic Liver Failure (EASL-CLIF) consortium. On paper both definitions and diagnostic criteria appear to be different from each other, reflecting the differences in cut-off values for individual parameters used in diagnosis, the acute insult or precipitating event and the underlying chronic liver disease. Data directly comparing these two criteria are limited, and available studies reveal different outcomes when the two are applied to the same set of patients. However a review of the literature suggests that both definitions do not seem to identify the same set of patients. The definition given by the APASL consortium is easier to apply in day-to-day practice but the EASL-CLIF criteria appear to better predict mortality in ACLF. The World Gastroenterology Organization working party have proposed a working definition of ACLF which will identify patients from whom relevant data can be collected so that the similarities and the differences between the two regions, if any, can be clearly defined.

AB - Acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF), a newly recognized clinical entity seen in hospitalized patients with chronic liver disease including cirrhosis, is associated with high short- and medium term morbidity and mortality. None of the definitions of ACLF proposed so far have been universally accepted, the two most commonly used being those proposed by the Asia-Pacific Association for the Study of Liver (APASL) and the European Association for the Study of Liver - Chronic Liver Failure (EASL-CLIF) consortium. On paper both definitions and diagnostic criteria appear to be different from each other, reflecting the differences in cut-off values for individual parameters used in diagnosis, the acute insult or precipitating event and the underlying chronic liver disease. Data directly comparing these two criteria are limited, and available studies reveal different outcomes when the two are applied to the same set of patients. However a review of the literature suggests that both definitions do not seem to identify the same set of patients. The definition given by the APASL consortium is easier to apply in day-to-day practice but the EASL-CLIF criteria appear to better predict mortality in ACLF. The World Gastroenterology Organization working party have proposed a working definition of ACLF which will identify patients from whom relevant data can be collected so that the similarities and the differences between the two regions, if any, can be clearly defined.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84947441415&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84947441415&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4254/wjh.v7.i25.2571

DO - 10.4254/wjh.v7.i25.2571

M3 - Editorial

VL - 7

SP - 2571

EP - 2577

JO - World Journal of Hepatology

JF - World Journal of Hepatology

SN - 1948-5182

IS - 25

ER -