Development of Pocket Vision Screener and its effectiveness at screening visual acuity deficits

Monica Raja, Dharani Ramamurthy, Krithica Srinivasan, L. Srinivasa Varadharajan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Aim: The aim was to construct a visual acuity chart and find its effectiveness at screening visual acuity deficits. Materials and Methods: Two phases were involved in this study.Construction of the screener: Ten Sloan letters (C, D, H, K, N, O, R, S, V, and Z) were selected and the letters were constructed and reduced to 0.2 logMAR acuity size (6.92 mm) for viewing at 3 m. The screener contains three lines with seven letters in each. Few combinations of the seven letter sequences were chosen based on the row legibility scores. Three seven letter combinations close to the median of all combinations were selected, such that maximum difficulty score difference between the lines are <1%. Finding the effectiveness of the screener: 100 literate subjects with unaided visual acuity better than or equal to 6/60 were recruited for the study. Unaided visual acuity was tested using both the newly constructed Pocket Vision Screener and a logMAR visual acuity chart and the time taken to measure the visual acuity using both the charts was noted. Results: The mean age of the subjects was 43 ± 17 years. Subjects were classified as normal or deficient based on the logMAR visual acuity measurement. The screener was found to have 81% sensitivity, 94% specificity. The positive and negative predictive values were found to be 91% and 87%, respectively. A significant difference (P < 0.001) was found in the time taken to record visual acuity using both the charts. Conclusion: The Pocket Vision Screener can be used as a quick and accurate tool to screen subjects for visual acuity deficits, being highly sensitive, specific, and cost-effective.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1152-1155
Number of pages4
JournalIndian Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume62
Issue number12
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01-01-2014

Fingerprint

Visual Acuity
Costs and Cost Analysis
Sensitivity and Specificity

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Ophthalmology

Cite this

Raja, Monica ; Ramamurthy, Dharani ; Srinivasan, Krithica ; Varadharajan, L. Srinivasa. / Development of Pocket Vision Screener and its effectiveness at screening visual acuity deficits. In: Indian Journal of Ophthalmology. 2014 ; Vol. 62, No. 12. pp. 1152-1155.
@article{787d7df448f34ea6b308b4c6c0ea7368,
title = "Development of Pocket Vision Screener and its effectiveness at screening visual acuity deficits",
abstract = "Aim: The aim was to construct a visual acuity chart and find its effectiveness at screening visual acuity deficits. Materials and Methods: Two phases were involved in this study.Construction of the screener: Ten Sloan letters (C, D, H, K, N, O, R, S, V, and Z) were selected and the letters were constructed and reduced to 0.2 logMAR acuity size (6.92 mm) for viewing at 3 m. The screener contains three lines with seven letters in each. Few combinations of the seven letter sequences were chosen based on the row legibility scores. Three seven letter combinations close to the median of all combinations were selected, such that maximum difficulty score difference between the lines are <1{\%}. Finding the effectiveness of the screener: 100 literate subjects with unaided visual acuity better than or equal to 6/60 were recruited for the study. Unaided visual acuity was tested using both the newly constructed Pocket Vision Screener and a logMAR visual acuity chart and the time taken to measure the visual acuity using both the charts was noted. Results: The mean age of the subjects was 43 ± 17 years. Subjects were classified as normal or deficient based on the logMAR visual acuity measurement. The screener was found to have 81{\%} sensitivity, 94{\%} specificity. The positive and negative predictive values were found to be 91{\%} and 87{\%}, respectively. A significant difference (P < 0.001) was found in the time taken to record visual acuity using both the charts. Conclusion: The Pocket Vision Screener can be used as a quick and accurate tool to screen subjects for visual acuity deficits, being highly sensitive, specific, and cost-effective.",
author = "Monica Raja and Dharani Ramamurthy and Krithica Srinivasan and Varadharajan, {L. Srinivasa}",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.4103/0301-4738.149137",
language = "English",
volume = "62",
pages = "1152--1155",
journal = "Indian Journal of Ophthalmology",
issn = "0301-4738",
publisher = "Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd",
number = "12",

}

Development of Pocket Vision Screener and its effectiveness at screening visual acuity deficits. / Raja, Monica; Ramamurthy, Dharani; Srinivasan, Krithica; Varadharajan, L. Srinivasa.

In: Indian Journal of Ophthalmology, Vol. 62, No. 12, 01.01.2014, p. 1152-1155.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Development of Pocket Vision Screener and its effectiveness at screening visual acuity deficits

AU - Raja, Monica

AU - Ramamurthy, Dharani

AU - Srinivasan, Krithica

AU - Varadharajan, L. Srinivasa

PY - 2014/1/1

Y1 - 2014/1/1

N2 - Aim: The aim was to construct a visual acuity chart and find its effectiveness at screening visual acuity deficits. Materials and Methods: Two phases were involved in this study.Construction of the screener: Ten Sloan letters (C, D, H, K, N, O, R, S, V, and Z) were selected and the letters were constructed and reduced to 0.2 logMAR acuity size (6.92 mm) for viewing at 3 m. The screener contains three lines with seven letters in each. Few combinations of the seven letter sequences were chosen based on the row legibility scores. Three seven letter combinations close to the median of all combinations were selected, such that maximum difficulty score difference between the lines are <1%. Finding the effectiveness of the screener: 100 literate subjects with unaided visual acuity better than or equal to 6/60 were recruited for the study. Unaided visual acuity was tested using both the newly constructed Pocket Vision Screener and a logMAR visual acuity chart and the time taken to measure the visual acuity using both the charts was noted. Results: The mean age of the subjects was 43 ± 17 years. Subjects were classified as normal or deficient based on the logMAR visual acuity measurement. The screener was found to have 81% sensitivity, 94% specificity. The positive and negative predictive values were found to be 91% and 87%, respectively. A significant difference (P < 0.001) was found in the time taken to record visual acuity using both the charts. Conclusion: The Pocket Vision Screener can be used as a quick and accurate tool to screen subjects for visual acuity deficits, being highly sensitive, specific, and cost-effective.

AB - Aim: The aim was to construct a visual acuity chart and find its effectiveness at screening visual acuity deficits. Materials and Methods: Two phases were involved in this study.Construction of the screener: Ten Sloan letters (C, D, H, K, N, O, R, S, V, and Z) were selected and the letters were constructed and reduced to 0.2 logMAR acuity size (6.92 mm) for viewing at 3 m. The screener contains three lines with seven letters in each. Few combinations of the seven letter sequences were chosen based on the row legibility scores. Three seven letter combinations close to the median of all combinations were selected, such that maximum difficulty score difference between the lines are <1%. Finding the effectiveness of the screener: 100 literate subjects with unaided visual acuity better than or equal to 6/60 were recruited for the study. Unaided visual acuity was tested using both the newly constructed Pocket Vision Screener and a logMAR visual acuity chart and the time taken to measure the visual acuity using both the charts was noted. Results: The mean age of the subjects was 43 ± 17 years. Subjects were classified as normal or deficient based on the logMAR visual acuity measurement. The screener was found to have 81% sensitivity, 94% specificity. The positive and negative predictive values were found to be 91% and 87%, respectively. A significant difference (P < 0.001) was found in the time taken to record visual acuity using both the charts. Conclusion: The Pocket Vision Screener can be used as a quick and accurate tool to screen subjects for visual acuity deficits, being highly sensitive, specific, and cost-effective.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84921880309&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84921880309&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4103/0301-4738.149137

DO - 10.4103/0301-4738.149137

M3 - Article

VL - 62

SP - 1152

EP - 1155

JO - Indian Journal of Ophthalmology

JF - Indian Journal of Ophthalmology

SN - 0301-4738

IS - 12

ER -