Abstract

Objective: To assess the diagnostic accuracy of Ultrasonography (USG) in diagnosing superficial facial fractures. Material and Methods: Patients visiting our facility with facial trauma and suspected fracture of the facial skeleton, those who had undergone CT scans, and conventional radiographic examinations and those who were conscious and cooperative were included in the study. All conventional radiographs, CT scans and ultrasound examinations were done during 0-20 days after trauma in all the patients. Results: A total of 20 patients participated in our study, out of which 18 were male (90%) with a mean age of 34.4 years (range of 19-75 years). Eleven sites of the face were examined bilaterally in each patient, i.e., a total of 440 sites. Of these, 84 sites were found to be fractured according to the CT scan examination whereas conventional radiographs detected 59 and ultrasonography detected 74 fractures (of which 70 were true fractures, while 4 were false-positive results). The sensitivity and specificity of USG in all fracture sites were 83.33% and 98.88% respectively. The positive and negative predictive values were 94.59% and 96.17% respectively. Conclusion: Ultrasound examination had a better sensitivity when compared to conventional radiography in detecting superficial facial fractures.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere4832
JournalPesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clinica Integrada
Volume19
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01-01-2019

Fingerprint

Ultrasonography
Wounds and Injuries
Skeleton
Radiography
Sensitivity and Specificity

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Dentistry(all)

Cite this

@article{b2334dad6bcc4e57ac8c6cd961d684dd,
title = "Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonography in the assessment of facial fractures",
abstract = "Objective: To assess the diagnostic accuracy of Ultrasonography (USG) in diagnosing superficial facial fractures. Material and Methods: Patients visiting our facility with facial trauma and suspected fracture of the facial skeleton, those who had undergone CT scans, and conventional radiographic examinations and those who were conscious and cooperative were included in the study. All conventional radiographs, CT scans and ultrasound examinations were done during 0-20 days after trauma in all the patients. Results: A total of 20 patients participated in our study, out of which 18 were male (90{\%}) with a mean age of 34.4 years (range of 19-75 years). Eleven sites of the face were examined bilaterally in each patient, i.e., a total of 440 sites. Of these, 84 sites were found to be fractured according to the CT scan examination whereas conventional radiographs detected 59 and ultrasonography detected 74 fractures (of which 70 were true fractures, while 4 were false-positive results). The sensitivity and specificity of USG in all fracture sites were 83.33{\%} and 98.88{\%} respectively. The positive and negative predictive values were 94.59{\%} and 96.17{\%} respectively. Conclusion: Ultrasound examination had a better sensitivity when compared to conventional radiography in detecting superficial facial fractures.",
author = "Akshaya Rajeev and Pai, {Keerthilatha Muralidhar} and Komal Smriti and Rajagopal Kadavigere and Kamath, {Abhay Taranath} and Srikanth Gadicherla and Pentapati, {Kalyana Chakravarthy}",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.4034/PBOCI.2019.191.133",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
journal = "Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clinica Integrada",
issn = "1519-0501",
publisher = "Association of Support to Oral Health Research (APESB)",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonography in the assessment of facial fractures

AU - Rajeev, Akshaya

AU - Pai, Keerthilatha Muralidhar

AU - Smriti, Komal

AU - Kadavigere, Rajagopal

AU - Kamath, Abhay Taranath

AU - Gadicherla, Srikanth

AU - Pentapati, Kalyana Chakravarthy

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Objective: To assess the diagnostic accuracy of Ultrasonography (USG) in diagnosing superficial facial fractures. Material and Methods: Patients visiting our facility with facial trauma and suspected fracture of the facial skeleton, those who had undergone CT scans, and conventional radiographic examinations and those who were conscious and cooperative were included in the study. All conventional radiographs, CT scans and ultrasound examinations were done during 0-20 days after trauma in all the patients. Results: A total of 20 patients participated in our study, out of which 18 were male (90%) with a mean age of 34.4 years (range of 19-75 years). Eleven sites of the face were examined bilaterally in each patient, i.e., a total of 440 sites. Of these, 84 sites were found to be fractured according to the CT scan examination whereas conventional radiographs detected 59 and ultrasonography detected 74 fractures (of which 70 were true fractures, while 4 were false-positive results). The sensitivity and specificity of USG in all fracture sites were 83.33% and 98.88% respectively. The positive and negative predictive values were 94.59% and 96.17% respectively. Conclusion: Ultrasound examination had a better sensitivity when compared to conventional radiography in detecting superficial facial fractures.

AB - Objective: To assess the diagnostic accuracy of Ultrasonography (USG) in diagnosing superficial facial fractures. Material and Methods: Patients visiting our facility with facial trauma and suspected fracture of the facial skeleton, those who had undergone CT scans, and conventional radiographic examinations and those who were conscious and cooperative were included in the study. All conventional radiographs, CT scans and ultrasound examinations were done during 0-20 days after trauma in all the patients. Results: A total of 20 patients participated in our study, out of which 18 were male (90%) with a mean age of 34.4 years (range of 19-75 years). Eleven sites of the face were examined bilaterally in each patient, i.e., a total of 440 sites. Of these, 84 sites were found to be fractured according to the CT scan examination whereas conventional radiographs detected 59 and ultrasonography detected 74 fractures (of which 70 were true fractures, while 4 were false-positive results). The sensitivity and specificity of USG in all fracture sites were 83.33% and 98.88% respectively. The positive and negative predictive values were 94.59% and 96.17% respectively. Conclusion: Ultrasound examination had a better sensitivity when compared to conventional radiography in detecting superficial facial fractures.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85073373835&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85073373835&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4034/PBOCI.2019.191.133

DO - 10.4034/PBOCI.2019.191.133

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85073373835

VL - 19

JO - Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clinica Integrada

JF - Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clinica Integrada

SN - 1519-0501

IS - 1

M1 - e4832

ER -