Dimensions of hospital service quality: A critical review: Perspective of patients from global studies

Yogesh P. Pai, Satyanarayana T. Chary

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to review the service quality dimensions established in various studies conducted across the world specifically applied to health care. Design/methodology/approach: Studies conducted on quality of care selected from literature databases - Ebsco, Emerald Insight, ABI/Inform - was subjected to a comprehensive in-depth content analysis. Findings: Service quality has been extensively studied with considerable efforts taken to develop survey instruments for measuring purposes. The number of dimensional structure varies across the studies. Self-administered questionnaire dominates in terms of mode of administration adopted in the studies, with respondents ranging from 18 to 85 years. Target sample size ranged from 84-2,000 respondents in self-administered questionnaires and for mail administration ranged from 300-2,600 respondents. Studies vary in terms of the scores used ranging from four to ten-point scale. A total of 27 of the studies have used EFA, 11 studies have used structural equation modelling and eight studies used gap scores. Cronbach's alpha is the most commonly used measure of scale reliability. There is variation in terms of measuring the content, criteria and construct validation among the studies. Practical implications: The literature offers dimensions used in assessing patient perceived service quality. The review reveals diversity and a plethora of dimensions and methodology to develop the construct discussed. Originality/value: The reported study describes and contrasts a large number of service-quality measurement constructs and highlights the usage of dimensions. The findings are valuable to academics in terms of dimensions and methodology used, approach for analysis; whereas findings are of value to practitioners in terms of the dimensions found in the research and to identify the gap in their setting.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)308-340
Number of pages33
JournalInternational Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance
Volume26
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 04-2013

Fingerprint

Quality of Health Care
Validation Studies
Postal Service
Sample Size
Surveys and Questionnaires
Hospital services
Service quality
Databases
Delivery of Health Care
Research
Questionnaire
Methodology
Quality of care
Exploratory factor analysis
Construct validation
Healthcare
Sample size
Quality measurement
Design methodology
Perceived service quality

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Health Policy

Cite this

@article{b82287053c6545e89ab6c28a6a9bd1b9,
title = "Dimensions of hospital service quality: A critical review: Perspective of patients from global studies",
abstract = "Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to review the service quality dimensions established in various studies conducted across the world specifically applied to health care. Design/methodology/approach: Studies conducted on quality of care selected from literature databases - Ebsco, Emerald Insight, ABI/Inform - was subjected to a comprehensive in-depth content analysis. Findings: Service quality has been extensively studied with considerable efforts taken to develop survey instruments for measuring purposes. The number of dimensional structure varies across the studies. Self-administered questionnaire dominates in terms of mode of administration adopted in the studies, with respondents ranging from 18 to 85 years. Target sample size ranged from 84-2,000 respondents in self-administered questionnaires and for mail administration ranged from 300-2,600 respondents. Studies vary in terms of the scores used ranging from four to ten-point scale. A total of 27 of the studies have used EFA, 11 studies have used structural equation modelling and eight studies used gap scores. Cronbach's alpha is the most commonly used measure of scale reliability. There is variation in terms of measuring the content, criteria and construct validation among the studies. Practical implications: The literature offers dimensions used in assessing patient perceived service quality. The review reveals diversity and a plethora of dimensions and methodology to develop the construct discussed. Originality/value: The reported study describes and contrasts a large number of service-quality measurement constructs and highlights the usage of dimensions. The findings are valuable to academics in terms of dimensions and methodology used, approach for analysis; whereas findings are of value to practitioners in terms of the dimensions found in the research and to identify the gap in their setting.",
author = "Pai, {Yogesh P.} and Chary, {Satyanarayana T.}",
year = "2013",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1108/09526861311319555",
language = "English",
volume = "26",
pages = "308--340",
journal = "International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance",
issn = "0952-6862",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.",
number = "4",

}

Dimensions of hospital service quality : A critical review: Perspective of patients from global studies. / Pai, Yogesh P.; Chary, Satyanarayana T.

In: International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance, Vol. 26, No. 4, 04.2013, p. 308-340.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Dimensions of hospital service quality

T2 - A critical review: Perspective of patients from global studies

AU - Pai, Yogesh P.

AU - Chary, Satyanarayana T.

PY - 2013/4

Y1 - 2013/4

N2 - Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to review the service quality dimensions established in various studies conducted across the world specifically applied to health care. Design/methodology/approach: Studies conducted on quality of care selected from literature databases - Ebsco, Emerald Insight, ABI/Inform - was subjected to a comprehensive in-depth content analysis. Findings: Service quality has been extensively studied with considerable efforts taken to develop survey instruments for measuring purposes. The number of dimensional structure varies across the studies. Self-administered questionnaire dominates in terms of mode of administration adopted in the studies, with respondents ranging from 18 to 85 years. Target sample size ranged from 84-2,000 respondents in self-administered questionnaires and for mail administration ranged from 300-2,600 respondents. Studies vary in terms of the scores used ranging from four to ten-point scale. A total of 27 of the studies have used EFA, 11 studies have used structural equation modelling and eight studies used gap scores. Cronbach's alpha is the most commonly used measure of scale reliability. There is variation in terms of measuring the content, criteria and construct validation among the studies. Practical implications: The literature offers dimensions used in assessing patient perceived service quality. The review reveals diversity and a plethora of dimensions and methodology to develop the construct discussed. Originality/value: The reported study describes and contrasts a large number of service-quality measurement constructs and highlights the usage of dimensions. The findings are valuable to academics in terms of dimensions and methodology used, approach for analysis; whereas findings are of value to practitioners in terms of the dimensions found in the research and to identify the gap in their setting.

AB - Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to review the service quality dimensions established in various studies conducted across the world specifically applied to health care. Design/methodology/approach: Studies conducted on quality of care selected from literature databases - Ebsco, Emerald Insight, ABI/Inform - was subjected to a comprehensive in-depth content analysis. Findings: Service quality has been extensively studied with considerable efforts taken to develop survey instruments for measuring purposes. The number of dimensional structure varies across the studies. Self-administered questionnaire dominates in terms of mode of administration adopted in the studies, with respondents ranging from 18 to 85 years. Target sample size ranged from 84-2,000 respondents in self-administered questionnaires and for mail administration ranged from 300-2,600 respondents. Studies vary in terms of the scores used ranging from four to ten-point scale. A total of 27 of the studies have used EFA, 11 studies have used structural equation modelling and eight studies used gap scores. Cronbach's alpha is the most commonly used measure of scale reliability. There is variation in terms of measuring the content, criteria and construct validation among the studies. Practical implications: The literature offers dimensions used in assessing patient perceived service quality. The review reveals diversity and a plethora of dimensions and methodology to develop the construct discussed. Originality/value: The reported study describes and contrasts a large number of service-quality measurement constructs and highlights the usage of dimensions. The findings are valuable to academics in terms of dimensions and methodology used, approach for analysis; whereas findings are of value to practitioners in terms of the dimensions found in the research and to identify the gap in their setting.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84878227956&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84878227956&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1108/09526861311319555

DO - 10.1108/09526861311319555

M3 - Review article

C2 - 23795424

AN - SCOPUS:84878227956

VL - 26

SP - 308

EP - 340

JO - International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance

JF - International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance

SN - 0952-6862

IS - 4

ER -