Effect of foot placements during sit to stand transition on timed up and go test in stroke subjects

A cross sectional study

Abraham M. Joshua, Shreekanth D. Karnad, Akshatha Nayak, B. V. Suresh, Prasanna Mithra, B. Unnikrishnan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVE: Timed up and go (TUG) test is been used as a screening tool for the assessment of risk of falling in individuals following stroke. Though TUG test is a quick test, it has fair sensitivity compared to other tests. This study was carried out to obtain and compare test scores for different types of foot placements during sit to stand transition in stroke subjects. METHOD: A Cross-sectional study with purposive sampling included 28 post stroke subjects who were able to walk 6 meter with or without assistance. Timed Up and Go test was carried out with four different types of foot placements and scores were recorded. The data were compared using Kruskal-Wallis One way analysis of variance and Wilcoxon signed ranks test. RESULT: There were comparable differences between asymmetric 1 test strategy which involved affected extremity to be placed behind the unaffected and other test strategies (Z = -4.457,-3.848,-4.458; p = 0.000). CONCLUSION: The initial foot placements during sit to stand transition influenced the time taken to complete the test which was significantly higher in asymmetric 1 strategy, Incorporation of the initial foot placement mainly asymmetric 1 strategy into conventional TUG test would help in identifying accurately the subject's functional mobility and postural stability.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)355-362
Number of pages8
JournalNeuroRehabilitation
Volume40
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Fingerprint

Foot
Cross-Sectional Studies
Stroke
Prothrombin Time
Nonparametric Statistics
Analysis of Variance
Extremities

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
  • Rehabilitation
  • Clinical Neurology

Cite this

@article{274e47a4f0964187bff37476c214c5a3,
title = "Effect of foot placements during sit to stand transition on timed up and go test in stroke subjects: A cross sectional study",
abstract = "BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVE: Timed up and go (TUG) test is been used as a screening tool for the assessment of risk of falling in individuals following stroke. Though TUG test is a quick test, it has fair sensitivity compared to other tests. This study was carried out to obtain and compare test scores for different types of foot placements during sit to stand transition in stroke subjects. METHOD: A Cross-sectional study with purposive sampling included 28 post stroke subjects who were able to walk 6 meter with or without assistance. Timed Up and Go test was carried out with four different types of foot placements and scores were recorded. The data were compared using Kruskal-Wallis One way analysis of variance and Wilcoxon signed ranks test. RESULT: There were comparable differences between asymmetric 1 test strategy which involved affected extremity to be placed behind the unaffected and other test strategies (Z = -4.457,-3.848,-4.458; p = 0.000). CONCLUSION: The initial foot placements during sit to stand transition influenced the time taken to complete the test which was significantly higher in asymmetric 1 strategy, Incorporation of the initial foot placement mainly asymmetric 1 strategy into conventional TUG test would help in identifying accurately the subject's functional mobility and postural stability.",
author = "Joshua, {Abraham M.} and Karnad, {Shreekanth D.} and Akshatha Nayak and Suresh, {B. V.} and Prasanna Mithra and B. Unnikrishnan",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.3233/NRE-161423",
language = "English",
volume = "40",
pages = "355--362",
journal = "NeuroRehabilitation",
issn = "1053-8135",
publisher = "IOS Press",
number = "3",

}

Effect of foot placements during sit to stand transition on timed up and go test in stroke subjects : A cross sectional study. / Joshua, Abraham M.; Karnad, Shreekanth D.; Nayak, Akshatha; Suresh, B. V.; Mithra, Prasanna; Unnikrishnan, B.

In: NeuroRehabilitation, Vol. 40, No. 3, 2017, p. 355-362.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effect of foot placements during sit to stand transition on timed up and go test in stroke subjects

T2 - A cross sectional study

AU - Joshua, Abraham M.

AU - Karnad, Shreekanth D.

AU - Nayak, Akshatha

AU - Suresh, B. V.

AU - Mithra, Prasanna

AU - Unnikrishnan, B.

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVE: Timed up and go (TUG) test is been used as a screening tool for the assessment of risk of falling in individuals following stroke. Though TUG test is a quick test, it has fair sensitivity compared to other tests. This study was carried out to obtain and compare test scores for different types of foot placements during sit to stand transition in stroke subjects. METHOD: A Cross-sectional study with purposive sampling included 28 post stroke subjects who were able to walk 6 meter with or without assistance. Timed Up and Go test was carried out with four different types of foot placements and scores were recorded. The data were compared using Kruskal-Wallis One way analysis of variance and Wilcoxon signed ranks test. RESULT: There were comparable differences between asymmetric 1 test strategy which involved affected extremity to be placed behind the unaffected and other test strategies (Z = -4.457,-3.848,-4.458; p = 0.000). CONCLUSION: The initial foot placements during sit to stand transition influenced the time taken to complete the test which was significantly higher in asymmetric 1 strategy, Incorporation of the initial foot placement mainly asymmetric 1 strategy into conventional TUG test would help in identifying accurately the subject's functional mobility and postural stability.

AB - BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVE: Timed up and go (TUG) test is been used as a screening tool for the assessment of risk of falling in individuals following stroke. Though TUG test is a quick test, it has fair sensitivity compared to other tests. This study was carried out to obtain and compare test scores for different types of foot placements during sit to stand transition in stroke subjects. METHOD: A Cross-sectional study with purposive sampling included 28 post stroke subjects who were able to walk 6 meter with or without assistance. Timed Up and Go test was carried out with four different types of foot placements and scores were recorded. The data were compared using Kruskal-Wallis One way analysis of variance and Wilcoxon signed ranks test. RESULT: There were comparable differences between asymmetric 1 test strategy which involved affected extremity to be placed behind the unaffected and other test strategies (Z = -4.457,-3.848,-4.458; p = 0.000). CONCLUSION: The initial foot placements during sit to stand transition influenced the time taken to complete the test which was significantly higher in asymmetric 1 strategy, Incorporation of the initial foot placement mainly asymmetric 1 strategy into conventional TUG test would help in identifying accurately the subject's functional mobility and postural stability.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85019120305&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85019120305&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3233/NRE-161423

DO - 10.3233/NRE-161423

M3 - Article

VL - 40

SP - 355

EP - 362

JO - NeuroRehabilitation

JF - NeuroRehabilitation

SN - 1053-8135

IS - 3

ER -