Efficacy of a remote based computerised visual acuity measurement

Krithica Srinivasan, S. Ve Ramesh, Noushad Babu, Nijil Sanker, Avik Ray, S. M. Karuna

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Aim: To determine the efficacy of a remotely operated computer-based logarithmic (logMAR) visual acuity chart. Methods: Visual acuity was tested using a laptop or computer-based logMAR chart (COMPlog) for all subjects by two different methods. The methods differed by the physical presence and absence (remote) of an optometrist and in the mode of instructions provided. Remote access was obtained through the internet, using Teamviewer software to control the system linked to COMPlog and instructions were provided by telephone. The order of measurements and the eye to be tested was randomised. logMAR visual acuity and time taken were recorded. A questionnaire was used to assess the participant's feedback. Results: Intraclass correlation for visual acuity between the two methods (α=0.964, 95% CI 0.937 to 0.979). There was no statistically significant difference (p=0.648) in the median visual acuity measurement between the two methods (median difference 0.00, IQR 0.20 logMAR). The time taken between the two methods was not statistically significant (p=0.457). There was no significant difference in the responses to the questionnaire between the study methods (p=0.119). Conclusions: Tele (remotely controlled) visual acuity measurement is as reliable as that measured with the physical presence of an optometrist.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)987-990
Number of pages4
JournalBritish Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume96
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01-07-2012

Fingerprint

Visual Acuity
Telephone
Internet
Software

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Ophthalmology
  • Sensory Systems
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience

Cite this

Srinivasan, Krithica ; Ramesh, S. Ve ; Babu, Noushad ; Sanker, Nijil ; Ray, Avik ; Karuna, S. M. / Efficacy of a remote based computerised visual acuity measurement. In: British Journal of Ophthalmology. 2012 ; Vol. 96, No. 7. pp. 987-990.
@article{a123622c99d3456f993874caca7f0252,
title = "Efficacy of a remote based computerised visual acuity measurement",
abstract = "Aim: To determine the efficacy of a remotely operated computer-based logarithmic (logMAR) visual acuity chart. Methods: Visual acuity was tested using a laptop or computer-based logMAR chart (COMPlog) for all subjects by two different methods. The methods differed by the physical presence and absence (remote) of an optometrist and in the mode of instructions provided. Remote access was obtained through the internet, using Teamviewer software to control the system linked to COMPlog and instructions were provided by telephone. The order of measurements and the eye to be tested was randomised. logMAR visual acuity and time taken were recorded. A questionnaire was used to assess the participant's feedback. Results: Intraclass correlation for visual acuity between the two methods (α=0.964, 95{\%} CI 0.937 to 0.979). There was no statistically significant difference (p=0.648) in the median visual acuity measurement between the two methods (median difference 0.00, IQR 0.20 logMAR). The time taken between the two methods was not statistically significant (p=0.457). There was no significant difference in the responses to the questionnaire between the study methods (p=0.119). Conclusions: Tele (remotely controlled) visual acuity measurement is as reliable as that measured with the physical presence of an optometrist.",
author = "Krithica Srinivasan and Ramesh, {S. Ve} and Noushad Babu and Nijil Sanker and Avik Ray and Karuna, {S. M.}",
year = "2012",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1136/bjophthalmol-2012-301751",
language = "English",
volume = "96",
pages = "987--990",
journal = "British Journal of Ophthalmology",
issn = "0007-1161",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "7",

}

Efficacy of a remote based computerised visual acuity measurement. / Srinivasan, Krithica; Ramesh, S. Ve; Babu, Noushad; Sanker, Nijil; Ray, Avik; Karuna, S. M.

In: British Journal of Ophthalmology, Vol. 96, No. 7, 01.07.2012, p. 987-990.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Efficacy of a remote based computerised visual acuity measurement

AU - Srinivasan, Krithica

AU - Ramesh, S. Ve

AU - Babu, Noushad

AU - Sanker, Nijil

AU - Ray, Avik

AU - Karuna, S. M.

PY - 2012/7/1

Y1 - 2012/7/1

N2 - Aim: To determine the efficacy of a remotely operated computer-based logarithmic (logMAR) visual acuity chart. Methods: Visual acuity was tested using a laptop or computer-based logMAR chart (COMPlog) for all subjects by two different methods. The methods differed by the physical presence and absence (remote) of an optometrist and in the mode of instructions provided. Remote access was obtained through the internet, using Teamviewer software to control the system linked to COMPlog and instructions were provided by telephone. The order of measurements and the eye to be tested was randomised. logMAR visual acuity and time taken were recorded. A questionnaire was used to assess the participant's feedback. Results: Intraclass correlation for visual acuity between the two methods (α=0.964, 95% CI 0.937 to 0.979). There was no statistically significant difference (p=0.648) in the median visual acuity measurement between the two methods (median difference 0.00, IQR 0.20 logMAR). The time taken between the two methods was not statistically significant (p=0.457). There was no significant difference in the responses to the questionnaire between the study methods (p=0.119). Conclusions: Tele (remotely controlled) visual acuity measurement is as reliable as that measured with the physical presence of an optometrist.

AB - Aim: To determine the efficacy of a remotely operated computer-based logarithmic (logMAR) visual acuity chart. Methods: Visual acuity was tested using a laptop or computer-based logMAR chart (COMPlog) for all subjects by two different methods. The methods differed by the physical presence and absence (remote) of an optometrist and in the mode of instructions provided. Remote access was obtained through the internet, using Teamviewer software to control the system linked to COMPlog and instructions were provided by telephone. The order of measurements and the eye to be tested was randomised. logMAR visual acuity and time taken were recorded. A questionnaire was used to assess the participant's feedback. Results: Intraclass correlation for visual acuity between the two methods (α=0.964, 95% CI 0.937 to 0.979). There was no statistically significant difference (p=0.648) in the median visual acuity measurement between the two methods (median difference 0.00, IQR 0.20 logMAR). The time taken between the two methods was not statistically significant (p=0.457). There was no significant difference in the responses to the questionnaire between the study methods (p=0.119). Conclusions: Tele (remotely controlled) visual acuity measurement is as reliable as that measured with the physical presence of an optometrist.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84862852966&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84862852966&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2012-301751

DO - 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2012-301751

M3 - Article

VL - 96

SP - 987

EP - 990

JO - British Journal of Ophthalmology

JF - British Journal of Ophthalmology

SN - 0007-1161

IS - 7

ER -