Efficacy of protaper retreatment system in root canals obturated with gutta-percha using two different sealers and guttaflow

Jaya Siotia, Shashi Rashmi Acharya, Sunil Kumar Gupta

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective. To compare the efficacy of ProTaper retreatment files in removing three different obturating materials. Study Design. Forty-five human, single-rooted premolars were divided into three experimental groups. Group 1 was obturated with gutta-percha and AH Plus sealer, Group 2 was obturated with gutta-percha and zinc oxide eugenol sealer, and Group 3 was obturated with GuttaFlow. Retreatment was done using the ProTaper universal rotary retreatment files. Root halves were visualized using magnifying loops at 3X magnification and optical stereomicroscope at 10X magnification. Images were analyzed using AutoCAD 2004 software to calculate area of the remaining debris in the canal. For statistical analysis were used variance test and ANOVA. Results. Total debris/canal area ratio between the three groups showed a statistically significant difference (P<0.001). Conclusion. ProTaper retreatment system did not produce completely clean canals in any of the groups. However, it had the best efficacy towards removing silicon based obturating material GuttaFlow.

Original languageEnglish
Article number676128
JournalInternational Journal of Dentistry
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01-12-2011

Fingerprint

Gutta-Percha
Retreatment
Dental Pulp Cavity
Zinc Oxide
Eugenol
Bicuspid
Silicon
Analysis of Variance
Software
GuttaFlow

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Dentistry(all)

Cite this

@article{cc1bff565ac74852b4aed45bd5e523c7,
title = "Efficacy of protaper retreatment system in root canals obturated with gutta-percha using two different sealers and guttaflow",
abstract = "Objective. To compare the efficacy of ProTaper retreatment files in removing three different obturating materials. Study Design. Forty-five human, single-rooted premolars were divided into three experimental groups. Group 1 was obturated with gutta-percha and AH Plus sealer, Group 2 was obturated with gutta-percha and zinc oxide eugenol sealer, and Group 3 was obturated with GuttaFlow. Retreatment was done using the ProTaper universal rotary retreatment files. Root halves were visualized using magnifying loops at 3X magnification and optical stereomicroscope at 10X magnification. Images were analyzed using AutoCAD 2004 software to calculate area of the remaining debris in the canal. For statistical analysis were used variance test and ANOVA. Results. Total debris/canal area ratio between the three groups showed a statistically significant difference (P<0.001). Conclusion. ProTaper retreatment system did not produce completely clean canals in any of the groups. However, it had the best efficacy towards removing silicon based obturating material GuttaFlow.",
author = "Jaya Siotia and Acharya, {Shashi Rashmi} and Gupta, {Sunil Kumar}",
year = "2011",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1155/2011/676128",
language = "English",
journal = "International Journal of Dentistry",
issn = "1687-8728",
publisher = "Hindawi Publishing Corporation",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Efficacy of protaper retreatment system in root canals obturated with gutta-percha using two different sealers and guttaflow

AU - Siotia, Jaya

AU - Acharya, Shashi Rashmi

AU - Gupta, Sunil Kumar

PY - 2011/12/1

Y1 - 2011/12/1

N2 - Objective. To compare the efficacy of ProTaper retreatment files in removing three different obturating materials. Study Design. Forty-five human, single-rooted premolars were divided into three experimental groups. Group 1 was obturated with gutta-percha and AH Plus sealer, Group 2 was obturated with gutta-percha and zinc oxide eugenol sealer, and Group 3 was obturated with GuttaFlow. Retreatment was done using the ProTaper universal rotary retreatment files. Root halves were visualized using magnifying loops at 3X magnification and optical stereomicroscope at 10X magnification. Images were analyzed using AutoCAD 2004 software to calculate area of the remaining debris in the canal. For statistical analysis were used variance test and ANOVA. Results. Total debris/canal area ratio between the three groups showed a statistically significant difference (P<0.001). Conclusion. ProTaper retreatment system did not produce completely clean canals in any of the groups. However, it had the best efficacy towards removing silicon based obturating material GuttaFlow.

AB - Objective. To compare the efficacy of ProTaper retreatment files in removing three different obturating materials. Study Design. Forty-five human, single-rooted premolars were divided into three experimental groups. Group 1 was obturated with gutta-percha and AH Plus sealer, Group 2 was obturated with gutta-percha and zinc oxide eugenol sealer, and Group 3 was obturated with GuttaFlow. Retreatment was done using the ProTaper universal rotary retreatment files. Root halves were visualized using magnifying loops at 3X magnification and optical stereomicroscope at 10X magnification. Images were analyzed using AutoCAD 2004 software to calculate area of the remaining debris in the canal. For statistical analysis were used variance test and ANOVA. Results. Total debris/canal area ratio between the three groups showed a statistically significant difference (P<0.001). Conclusion. ProTaper retreatment system did not produce completely clean canals in any of the groups. However, it had the best efficacy towards removing silicon based obturating material GuttaFlow.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84855168827&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84855168827&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1155/2011/676128

DO - 10.1155/2011/676128

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84855168827

JO - International Journal of Dentistry

JF - International Journal of Dentistry

SN - 1687-8728

M1 - 676128

ER -