Estimation of sex from index and ring finger in a North Indian population

Kewal Krishan, Tanuj Kanchan, Ningthoukhongjam Asha, Sandeep Kaur, Preetika M. Chatterjee, Bahadur Singh

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

22 Citations (SciVal)

Abstract

Estimation of sex is an important parameter in the examination of unknown dismembered and commingled remains. The present study explores the possibility of estimation of sex from length of index and ring finger and the index and ring finger ratio in 140 individuals (70 boys and 70 girls) from North India. Index finger length (IFL) and ring finger length (RFL) of the participants were measured following standard procedures and landmarks. Sex differentiation in the present study was based on sectioning point analysis. The 'sectioning point' for the IFL, RFL and the index and the ring finger ratio was estimated from the average of the mean of male and female values. Binary logistic regression (BLR) analysis was employed to derive a predicting equation for estimation of sex. The results of the present study indicate that significant sex differences exist in the IFL and RFL and index and ring finger ratio. Among finger lengths, RFL is a better predictor of sex than IFL. It is further concluded that the index and ring finger length is of limited utility in estimation of sex in forensic casework and should be employed only in cases when no other means of sexing are available. The study suggests that the index and ring finger ratio should not be employed in estimation of sex in forensic casework due to considerable overlap in male and female values.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)471-479
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Forensic and Legal Medicine
Volume20
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01-07-2013
Externally publishedYes

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine
  • Law

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Estimation of sex from index and ring finger in a North Indian population'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this