Europeanisation of health systems: A qualitative study of domestic actors in a small state

Natasha Azzopardi-Muscat, Kristine Sorensen, Christoph Aluttis, Roderick Pace, Helmut Brand

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Health systems are not considered to be significantly influenced by European Union (EU) policies given the subsidiarity principle. Yet, recent developments including the patients' rights and cross-border directive (2011/24 EU), as well as measures taken following the financial crisis, appear to be increasing the EU's influence on health systems. The aim of this study is to explore how health system Europeanisation is perceived by domestic stakeholders within a small state. Methods: A qualitative study was conducted in the Maltese health system using 33 semi-structured interviews. Inductive analysis was carried out with codes and themes being generated from the data. Results: EU membership brought significant public health reforms, transformation in the regulation of medicines and development of specialised training for doctors. Health services financing and delivery were primarily unaffected. Stakeholders positively perceived improvements to the policy-making process, networking opportunities and capacity building as important benefits. However, the administrative burden and the EU's tendency to adopt a 'one size fits all' approach posed considerable challenges. The lack of power and visibility for health policy at the EU level is a major disappointment. A strong desire exists for the EU to exercise a more effective role in ensuring access to affordable medicines and preventing non-communicable diseases. However, the EU's interference with core health system values is strongly resisted. Conclusions: Overall domestic stakeholders have a positive outlook regarding their health system Europeanisation experience. Whilst welcoming further policy developments at the EU level, they believe that improved consideration must be given to the specificities of small health systems.

Original languageEnglish
Article number2909
JournalBMC Public Health
Volume16
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 14-04-2016

Fingerprint

European Union
Health
Policy Making
Healthcare Financing
Capacity Building
Patient Rights
Health Policy
Health Services
Public Health
Interviews

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Azzopardi-Muscat, Natasha ; Sorensen, Kristine ; Aluttis, Christoph ; Pace, Roderick ; Brand, Helmut. / Europeanisation of health systems : A qualitative study of domestic actors in a small state. In: BMC Public Health. 2016 ; Vol. 16, No. 1.
@article{e72affdfa7714bf78da675a806203866,
title = "Europeanisation of health systems: A qualitative study of domestic actors in a small state",
abstract = "Background: Health systems are not considered to be significantly influenced by European Union (EU) policies given the subsidiarity principle. Yet, recent developments including the patients' rights and cross-border directive (2011/24 EU), as well as measures taken following the financial crisis, appear to be increasing the EU's influence on health systems. The aim of this study is to explore how health system Europeanisation is perceived by domestic stakeholders within a small state. Methods: A qualitative study was conducted in the Maltese health system using 33 semi-structured interviews. Inductive analysis was carried out with codes and themes being generated from the data. Results: EU membership brought significant public health reforms, transformation in the regulation of medicines and development of specialised training for doctors. Health services financing and delivery were primarily unaffected. Stakeholders positively perceived improvements to the policy-making process, networking opportunities and capacity building as important benefits. However, the administrative burden and the EU's tendency to adopt a 'one size fits all' approach posed considerable challenges. The lack of power and visibility for health policy at the EU level is a major disappointment. A strong desire exists for the EU to exercise a more effective role in ensuring access to affordable medicines and preventing non-communicable diseases. However, the EU's interference with core health system values is strongly resisted. Conclusions: Overall domestic stakeholders have a positive outlook regarding their health system Europeanisation experience. Whilst welcoming further policy developments at the EU level, they believe that improved consideration must be given to the specificities of small health systems.",
author = "Natasha Azzopardi-Muscat and Kristine Sorensen and Christoph Aluttis and Roderick Pace and Helmut Brand",
year = "2016",
month = "4",
day = "14",
doi = "10.1186/s12889-016-2909-0",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
journal = "BMC Public Health",
issn = "1471-2458",
publisher = "BioMed Central",
number = "1",

}

Europeanisation of health systems : A qualitative study of domestic actors in a small state. / Azzopardi-Muscat, Natasha; Sorensen, Kristine; Aluttis, Christoph; Pace, Roderick; Brand, Helmut.

In: BMC Public Health, Vol. 16, No. 1, 2909, 14.04.2016.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Europeanisation of health systems

T2 - A qualitative study of domestic actors in a small state

AU - Azzopardi-Muscat, Natasha

AU - Sorensen, Kristine

AU - Aluttis, Christoph

AU - Pace, Roderick

AU - Brand, Helmut

PY - 2016/4/14

Y1 - 2016/4/14

N2 - Background: Health systems are not considered to be significantly influenced by European Union (EU) policies given the subsidiarity principle. Yet, recent developments including the patients' rights and cross-border directive (2011/24 EU), as well as measures taken following the financial crisis, appear to be increasing the EU's influence on health systems. The aim of this study is to explore how health system Europeanisation is perceived by domestic stakeholders within a small state. Methods: A qualitative study was conducted in the Maltese health system using 33 semi-structured interviews. Inductive analysis was carried out with codes and themes being generated from the data. Results: EU membership brought significant public health reforms, transformation in the regulation of medicines and development of specialised training for doctors. Health services financing and delivery were primarily unaffected. Stakeholders positively perceived improvements to the policy-making process, networking opportunities and capacity building as important benefits. However, the administrative burden and the EU's tendency to adopt a 'one size fits all' approach posed considerable challenges. The lack of power and visibility for health policy at the EU level is a major disappointment. A strong desire exists for the EU to exercise a more effective role in ensuring access to affordable medicines and preventing non-communicable diseases. However, the EU's interference with core health system values is strongly resisted. Conclusions: Overall domestic stakeholders have a positive outlook regarding their health system Europeanisation experience. Whilst welcoming further policy developments at the EU level, they believe that improved consideration must be given to the specificities of small health systems.

AB - Background: Health systems are not considered to be significantly influenced by European Union (EU) policies given the subsidiarity principle. Yet, recent developments including the patients' rights and cross-border directive (2011/24 EU), as well as measures taken following the financial crisis, appear to be increasing the EU's influence on health systems. The aim of this study is to explore how health system Europeanisation is perceived by domestic stakeholders within a small state. Methods: A qualitative study was conducted in the Maltese health system using 33 semi-structured interviews. Inductive analysis was carried out with codes and themes being generated from the data. Results: EU membership brought significant public health reforms, transformation in the regulation of medicines and development of specialised training for doctors. Health services financing and delivery were primarily unaffected. Stakeholders positively perceived improvements to the policy-making process, networking opportunities and capacity building as important benefits. However, the administrative burden and the EU's tendency to adopt a 'one size fits all' approach posed considerable challenges. The lack of power and visibility for health policy at the EU level is a major disappointment. A strong desire exists for the EU to exercise a more effective role in ensuring access to affordable medicines and preventing non-communicable diseases. However, the EU's interference with core health system values is strongly resisted. Conclusions: Overall domestic stakeholders have a positive outlook regarding their health system Europeanisation experience. Whilst welcoming further policy developments at the EU level, they believe that improved consideration must be given to the specificities of small health systems.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84966375760&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84966375760&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/s12889-016-2909-0

DO - 10.1186/s12889-016-2909-0

M3 - Article

C2 - 27079508

AN - SCOPUS:84966375760

VL - 16

JO - BMC Public Health

JF - BMC Public Health

SN - 1471-2458

IS - 1

M1 - 2909

ER -