Evaluation of a new ergonomic position for the operator/clinicians for the extraction of mandibular right posterior molar teeth

Srikanth Gadicherla, Kalyana Pentapati, Anupam Singh, Evit John, Komal Smriti

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Aims: This study aimed to assess and compare the feasibility of this new ergonomic position (2'o clock or left rear position) with conventional (12'o clock) position in the exodontia of the mandibular right posterior (MRP) teeth (second and third molars) among right-handed operators. Materials and Methods: An observational questionnaire study was conducted among dental students, faculty, postgraduates, and private practitioners. A self-administered questionnaire which evaluated eight domains, namely, posture of the operator, visibility of the teeth being extracted, fatigue to the operator, accessibility to the teeth being extracted, grasp of the molar teeth, delivery of force, retraction of cheeks, and difficulty in extraction were distributed to the operators. All the items in the questionnaire were based on visual analog scale. Results: A total of 63 operators have completed the study out of which 60.3% were females. The mean age of the participant was 25.63 ± 6.41 years. All the parameters have shown that the mean scores were significantly higher for 2'o clock than 12'o clock positions (P < 0.001), respectively. Conclusion: The new operator position (2'o clock) was more acceptable among the dentists for the extraction of MRP molar teeth.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)36-39
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of International Oral Health
Volume10
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01-01-2018

Fingerprint

Human Engineering
Tooth
Dental Faculties
Dental Students
Third Molar
Cheek
Dentists
Posture
Visual Analog Scale
Observational Studies
Fatigue
Surveys and Questionnaires

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Dentistry(all)

Cite this

@article{18cfa502e24449bea337989fae551d1b,
title = "Evaluation of a new ergonomic position for the operator/clinicians for the extraction of mandibular right posterior molar teeth",
abstract = "Aims: This study aimed to assess and compare the feasibility of this new ergonomic position (2'o clock or left rear position) with conventional (12'o clock) position in the exodontia of the mandibular right posterior (MRP) teeth (second and third molars) among right-handed operators. Materials and Methods: An observational questionnaire study was conducted among dental students, faculty, postgraduates, and private practitioners. A self-administered questionnaire which evaluated eight domains, namely, posture of the operator, visibility of the teeth being extracted, fatigue to the operator, accessibility to the teeth being extracted, grasp of the molar teeth, delivery of force, retraction of cheeks, and difficulty in extraction were distributed to the operators. All the items in the questionnaire were based on visual analog scale. Results: A total of 63 operators have completed the study out of which 60.3{\%} were females. The mean age of the participant was 25.63 ± 6.41 years. All the parameters have shown that the mean scores were significantly higher for 2'o clock than 12'o clock positions (P < 0.001), respectively. Conclusion: The new operator position (2'o clock) was more acceptable among the dentists for the extraction of MRP molar teeth.",
author = "Srikanth Gadicherla and Kalyana Pentapati and Anupam Singh and Evit John and Komal Smriti",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.4103/jioh.jioh_259_17",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
pages = "36--39",
journal = "Journal of International Oral Health",
issn = "0976-7428",
publisher = "Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd",
number = "1",

}

Evaluation of a new ergonomic position for the operator/clinicians for the extraction of mandibular right posterior molar teeth. / Gadicherla, Srikanth; Pentapati, Kalyana; Singh, Anupam; John, Evit; Smriti, Komal.

In: Journal of International Oral Health, Vol. 10, No. 1, 01.01.2018, p. 36-39.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of a new ergonomic position for the operator/clinicians for the extraction of mandibular right posterior molar teeth

AU - Gadicherla, Srikanth

AU - Pentapati, Kalyana

AU - Singh, Anupam

AU - John, Evit

AU - Smriti, Komal

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Aims: This study aimed to assess and compare the feasibility of this new ergonomic position (2'o clock or left rear position) with conventional (12'o clock) position in the exodontia of the mandibular right posterior (MRP) teeth (second and third molars) among right-handed operators. Materials and Methods: An observational questionnaire study was conducted among dental students, faculty, postgraduates, and private practitioners. A self-administered questionnaire which evaluated eight domains, namely, posture of the operator, visibility of the teeth being extracted, fatigue to the operator, accessibility to the teeth being extracted, grasp of the molar teeth, delivery of force, retraction of cheeks, and difficulty in extraction were distributed to the operators. All the items in the questionnaire were based on visual analog scale. Results: A total of 63 operators have completed the study out of which 60.3% were females. The mean age of the participant was 25.63 ± 6.41 years. All the parameters have shown that the mean scores were significantly higher for 2'o clock than 12'o clock positions (P < 0.001), respectively. Conclusion: The new operator position (2'o clock) was more acceptable among the dentists for the extraction of MRP molar teeth.

AB - Aims: This study aimed to assess and compare the feasibility of this new ergonomic position (2'o clock or left rear position) with conventional (12'o clock) position in the exodontia of the mandibular right posterior (MRP) teeth (second and third molars) among right-handed operators. Materials and Methods: An observational questionnaire study was conducted among dental students, faculty, postgraduates, and private practitioners. A self-administered questionnaire which evaluated eight domains, namely, posture of the operator, visibility of the teeth being extracted, fatigue to the operator, accessibility to the teeth being extracted, grasp of the molar teeth, delivery of force, retraction of cheeks, and difficulty in extraction were distributed to the operators. All the items in the questionnaire were based on visual analog scale. Results: A total of 63 operators have completed the study out of which 60.3% were females. The mean age of the participant was 25.63 ± 6.41 years. All the parameters have shown that the mean scores were significantly higher for 2'o clock than 12'o clock positions (P < 0.001), respectively. Conclusion: The new operator position (2'o clock) was more acceptable among the dentists for the extraction of MRP molar teeth.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85042685735&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85042685735&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4103/jioh.jioh_259_17

DO - 10.4103/jioh.jioh_259_17

M3 - Article

VL - 10

SP - 36

EP - 39

JO - Journal of International Oral Health

JF - Journal of International Oral Health

SN - 0976-7428

IS - 1

ER -