Evaluation of effectiveness of home remedies for toothbrush decontamination using vinegar and vinegar with common salt

Vinay Mavani, Karuna Y. Mahabala, Ethel Suman, Srikant Natarajan, P. Anupama Nayak, Suprabha B. Srikrishna, Arathi Rao

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Aim: The aim of the study was to evaluate if vinegar and vinegar with 3.5% sodium chloride could be used as an alternative to chlorhexidine gluconate for disinfection of toothbrushes. Materials and methods: The study consisted of three groups: group I: 0.12% chlorhexidine digluconate, group II: 38% white vinegar, and group III: 38% white vinegar with 3.5% sodium chloride. Two new toothbrushes were cultured to check their sterility before use. Eight children in the age group of 6 to 12 years were given oral hygiene instructions and four sets of oral hygiene kits. At the end of the 1st week, one set of used toothbrushes was cultured to check for total viable count. Again at the end of the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th weeks, the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th sets of brushes were collected, subjected to respective decontamination treatment for 12 hours, and then cultured for microbial analyses. The obtained data were analyzed using Fisher’s exact test. Results: In group I, three out of eight brushes showed 1 to 10,000 colonies, in group II, one out of eight cases showed >10,000 colonies and two out of eight showed 1 to 10,000 colonies, and in group III, all the eight cases showed no colonies upon culturing. Conclusion: Out of all the tested decontaminating agents, combination of 38% white vinegar and 3.5% sodium chloride was found to be the most efficient. Clinical significance: Toothbrushes become contaminated upon use and act as a reservoir for microorganisms. Thus, toothbrush decontamination should become a routine practice. Testing the disinfecting efficacy of vinegar and common salt is, thus, beneficial as they are available in every kitchen.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)19-23
Number of pages5
JournalWorld Journal of Dentistry
Volume9
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01-01-2018

Fingerprint

Decontamination
Traditional Medicine
Acetic Acid
Salts
Sodium Chloride
Oral Hygiene
Disinfection
Infertility
Age Groups

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Dentistry(all)

Cite this

@article{ea3d529bd444479a910a41e5949eef90,
title = "Evaluation of effectiveness of home remedies for toothbrush decontamination using vinegar and vinegar with common salt",
abstract = "Aim: The aim of the study was to evaluate if vinegar and vinegar with 3.5{\%} sodium chloride could be used as an alternative to chlorhexidine gluconate for disinfection of toothbrushes. Materials and methods: The study consisted of three groups: group I: 0.12{\%} chlorhexidine digluconate, group II: 38{\%} white vinegar, and group III: 38{\%} white vinegar with 3.5{\%} sodium chloride. Two new toothbrushes were cultured to check their sterility before use. Eight children in the age group of 6 to 12 years were given oral hygiene instructions and four sets of oral hygiene kits. At the end of the 1st week, one set of used toothbrushes was cultured to check for total viable count. Again at the end of the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th weeks, the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th sets of brushes were collected, subjected to respective decontamination treatment for 12 hours, and then cultured for microbial analyses. The obtained data were analyzed using Fisher’s exact test. Results: In group I, three out of eight brushes showed 1 to 10,000 colonies, in group II, one out of eight cases showed >10,000 colonies and two out of eight showed 1 to 10,000 colonies, and in group III, all the eight cases showed no colonies upon culturing. Conclusion: Out of all the tested decontaminating agents, combination of 38{\%} white vinegar and 3.5{\%} sodium chloride was found to be the most efficient. Clinical significance: Toothbrushes become contaminated upon use and act as a reservoir for microorganisms. Thus, toothbrush decontamination should become a routine practice. Testing the disinfecting efficacy of vinegar and common salt is, thus, beneficial as they are available in every kitchen.",
author = "Vinay Mavani and Mahabala, {Karuna Y.} and Ethel Suman and Srikant Natarajan and Nayak, {P. Anupama} and Srikrishna, {Suprabha B.} and Arathi Rao",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.5005/jp-journals-10015-1500",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
pages = "19--23",
journal = "World Journal of Dentistry",
issn = "0976-6006",
publisher = "Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd",
number = "1",

}

Evaluation of effectiveness of home remedies for toothbrush decontamination using vinegar and vinegar with common salt. / Mavani, Vinay; Mahabala, Karuna Y.; Suman, Ethel; Natarajan, Srikant; Nayak, P. Anupama; Srikrishna, Suprabha B.; Rao, Arathi.

In: World Journal of Dentistry, Vol. 9, No. 1, 01.01.2018, p. 19-23.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of effectiveness of home remedies for toothbrush decontamination using vinegar and vinegar with common salt

AU - Mavani, Vinay

AU - Mahabala, Karuna Y.

AU - Suman, Ethel

AU - Natarajan, Srikant

AU - Nayak, P. Anupama

AU - Srikrishna, Suprabha B.

AU - Rao, Arathi

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Aim: The aim of the study was to evaluate if vinegar and vinegar with 3.5% sodium chloride could be used as an alternative to chlorhexidine gluconate for disinfection of toothbrushes. Materials and methods: The study consisted of three groups: group I: 0.12% chlorhexidine digluconate, group II: 38% white vinegar, and group III: 38% white vinegar with 3.5% sodium chloride. Two new toothbrushes were cultured to check their sterility before use. Eight children in the age group of 6 to 12 years were given oral hygiene instructions and four sets of oral hygiene kits. At the end of the 1st week, one set of used toothbrushes was cultured to check for total viable count. Again at the end of the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th weeks, the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th sets of brushes were collected, subjected to respective decontamination treatment for 12 hours, and then cultured for microbial analyses. The obtained data were analyzed using Fisher’s exact test. Results: In group I, three out of eight brushes showed 1 to 10,000 colonies, in group II, one out of eight cases showed >10,000 colonies and two out of eight showed 1 to 10,000 colonies, and in group III, all the eight cases showed no colonies upon culturing. Conclusion: Out of all the tested decontaminating agents, combination of 38% white vinegar and 3.5% sodium chloride was found to be the most efficient. Clinical significance: Toothbrushes become contaminated upon use and act as a reservoir for microorganisms. Thus, toothbrush decontamination should become a routine practice. Testing the disinfecting efficacy of vinegar and common salt is, thus, beneficial as they are available in every kitchen.

AB - Aim: The aim of the study was to evaluate if vinegar and vinegar with 3.5% sodium chloride could be used as an alternative to chlorhexidine gluconate for disinfection of toothbrushes. Materials and methods: The study consisted of three groups: group I: 0.12% chlorhexidine digluconate, group II: 38% white vinegar, and group III: 38% white vinegar with 3.5% sodium chloride. Two new toothbrushes were cultured to check their sterility before use. Eight children in the age group of 6 to 12 years were given oral hygiene instructions and four sets of oral hygiene kits. At the end of the 1st week, one set of used toothbrushes was cultured to check for total viable count. Again at the end of the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th weeks, the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th sets of brushes were collected, subjected to respective decontamination treatment for 12 hours, and then cultured for microbial analyses. The obtained data were analyzed using Fisher’s exact test. Results: In group I, three out of eight brushes showed 1 to 10,000 colonies, in group II, one out of eight cases showed >10,000 colonies and two out of eight showed 1 to 10,000 colonies, and in group III, all the eight cases showed no colonies upon culturing. Conclusion: Out of all the tested decontaminating agents, combination of 38% white vinegar and 3.5% sodium chloride was found to be the most efficient. Clinical significance: Toothbrushes become contaminated upon use and act as a reservoir for microorganisms. Thus, toothbrush decontamination should become a routine practice. Testing the disinfecting efficacy of vinegar and common salt is, thus, beneficial as they are available in every kitchen.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85042453921&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85042453921&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.5005/jp-journals-10015-1500

DO - 10.5005/jp-journals-10015-1500

M3 - Article

VL - 9

SP - 19

EP - 23

JO - World Journal of Dentistry

JF - World Journal of Dentistry

SN - 0976-6006

IS - 1

ER -