Evaluation of polypharmacy and appropriateness of prescription in geriatric patients: A cross-sectional study at a tertiary care hospital

K. B. Rakesh, Mukta N. Chowta, Ashok K. Shenoy, Rajeshwari Shastry, Sunil B. Pai

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: To assess the polypharmacy and appropriateness of prescriptions in geriatric patients in a tertiary care hospital. Methods: An observational study was done in geriatric patients (>60 years) of either gender. The data collected from patients included: Socio-demographic data such as age, gender, marital status, educational status, socioeconomic status, occupation, nutritional status, history of alcohol/smoking, exercise history, details of comorbid diseases, medication history, findings of clinical examination etc. In this study, polypharmacy was considered as having 5 or more medications per prescription. Medication appropriateness for each patient was analysed separately based on their medical history and clinical findings by applying medication appropriateness index, screening tool to alert to right treatment (START) and Beers criteria and STOPP criteria. Results: A total of 426 patients, 216 (50.7%) were males and 210 (49.3%) were females. Polypharmacy was present in 282 prescriptions (66.2%). Highest prevalence of polypharmacy was seen in 70-79 years age group compared to the other two groups and it was statistically significant. Out of 426 patients, 36 patients were receiving drugs which were to be avoided as per Beers criteria. Among the total patients, 39 patients were overprescribed as per MAI, 56 patients were under prescribed as per START criteria and 85 out of 426 prescriptions were inappropriate in accordance with beers criteria, stop criteria, start criteria and MAI index. Conclusion: Around 66.19% patients were receiving polypharmacy. Significant number of patients were receiving drugs which are to be avoided as well as overprescribed and under prescribed. Inappropriate prescription was seen in a good number of patients.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)16-20
Number of pages5
JournalIndian Journal of Pharmacology
Volume49
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01-01-2017

Fingerprint

Polypharmacy
Tertiary Healthcare
Tertiary Care Centers
Geriatrics
Prescriptions
Cross-Sectional Studies
Inappropriate Prescribing
Patient Rights
Educational Status
Marital Status
Nutritional Status
Occupations
Social Class
Pharmaceutical Preparations
Observational Studies

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Pharmacology
  • Pharmacology (medical)

Cite this

@article{838adc1587654b8ba8de1c4941301957,
title = "Evaluation of polypharmacy and appropriateness of prescription in geriatric patients: A cross-sectional study at a tertiary care hospital",
abstract = "Objectives: To assess the polypharmacy and appropriateness of prescriptions in geriatric patients in a tertiary care hospital. Methods: An observational study was done in geriatric patients (>60 years) of either gender. The data collected from patients included: Socio-demographic data such as age, gender, marital status, educational status, socioeconomic status, occupation, nutritional status, history of alcohol/smoking, exercise history, details of comorbid diseases, medication history, findings of clinical examination etc. In this study, polypharmacy was considered as having 5 or more medications per prescription. Medication appropriateness for each patient was analysed separately based on their medical history and clinical findings by applying medication appropriateness index, screening tool to alert to right treatment (START) and Beers criteria and STOPP criteria. Results: A total of 426 patients, 216 (50.7{\%}) were males and 210 (49.3{\%}) were females. Polypharmacy was present in 282 prescriptions (66.2{\%}). Highest prevalence of polypharmacy was seen in 70-79 years age group compared to the other two groups and it was statistically significant. Out of 426 patients, 36 patients were receiving drugs which were to be avoided as per Beers criteria. Among the total patients, 39 patients were overprescribed as per MAI, 56 patients were under prescribed as per START criteria and 85 out of 426 prescriptions were inappropriate in accordance with beers criteria, stop criteria, start criteria and MAI index. Conclusion: Around 66.19{\%} patients were receiving polypharmacy. Significant number of patients were receiving drugs which are to be avoided as well as overprescribed and under prescribed. Inappropriate prescription was seen in a good number of patients.",
author = "Rakesh, {K. B.} and Chowta, {Mukta N.} and Shenoy, {Ashok K.} and Rajeshwari Shastry and Pai, {Sunil B.}",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.4103/0253-7613.201036",
language = "English",
volume = "49",
pages = "16--20",
journal = "Indian Journal of Pharmacology",
issn = "0253-7613",
publisher = "Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of polypharmacy and appropriateness of prescription in geriatric patients

T2 - A cross-sectional study at a tertiary care hospital

AU - Rakesh, K. B.

AU - Chowta, Mukta N.

AU - Shenoy, Ashok K.

AU - Shastry, Rajeshwari

AU - Pai, Sunil B.

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - Objectives: To assess the polypharmacy and appropriateness of prescriptions in geriatric patients in a tertiary care hospital. Methods: An observational study was done in geriatric patients (>60 years) of either gender. The data collected from patients included: Socio-demographic data such as age, gender, marital status, educational status, socioeconomic status, occupation, nutritional status, history of alcohol/smoking, exercise history, details of comorbid diseases, medication history, findings of clinical examination etc. In this study, polypharmacy was considered as having 5 or more medications per prescription. Medication appropriateness for each patient was analysed separately based on their medical history and clinical findings by applying medication appropriateness index, screening tool to alert to right treatment (START) and Beers criteria and STOPP criteria. Results: A total of 426 patients, 216 (50.7%) were males and 210 (49.3%) were females. Polypharmacy was present in 282 prescriptions (66.2%). Highest prevalence of polypharmacy was seen in 70-79 years age group compared to the other two groups and it was statistically significant. Out of 426 patients, 36 patients were receiving drugs which were to be avoided as per Beers criteria. Among the total patients, 39 patients were overprescribed as per MAI, 56 patients were under prescribed as per START criteria and 85 out of 426 prescriptions were inappropriate in accordance with beers criteria, stop criteria, start criteria and MAI index. Conclusion: Around 66.19% patients were receiving polypharmacy. Significant number of patients were receiving drugs which are to be avoided as well as overprescribed and under prescribed. Inappropriate prescription was seen in a good number of patients.

AB - Objectives: To assess the polypharmacy and appropriateness of prescriptions in geriatric patients in a tertiary care hospital. Methods: An observational study was done in geriatric patients (>60 years) of either gender. The data collected from patients included: Socio-demographic data such as age, gender, marital status, educational status, socioeconomic status, occupation, nutritional status, history of alcohol/smoking, exercise history, details of comorbid diseases, medication history, findings of clinical examination etc. In this study, polypharmacy was considered as having 5 or more medications per prescription. Medication appropriateness for each patient was analysed separately based on their medical history and clinical findings by applying medication appropriateness index, screening tool to alert to right treatment (START) and Beers criteria and STOPP criteria. Results: A total of 426 patients, 216 (50.7%) were males and 210 (49.3%) were females. Polypharmacy was present in 282 prescriptions (66.2%). Highest prevalence of polypharmacy was seen in 70-79 years age group compared to the other two groups and it was statistically significant. Out of 426 patients, 36 patients were receiving drugs which were to be avoided as per Beers criteria. Among the total patients, 39 patients were overprescribed as per MAI, 56 patients were under prescribed as per START criteria and 85 out of 426 prescriptions were inappropriate in accordance with beers criteria, stop criteria, start criteria and MAI index. Conclusion: Around 66.19% patients were receiving polypharmacy. Significant number of patients were receiving drugs which are to be avoided as well as overprescribed and under prescribed. Inappropriate prescription was seen in a good number of patients.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85014529525&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85014529525&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4103/0253-7613.201036

DO - 10.4103/0253-7613.201036

M3 - Article

C2 - 28458417

AN - SCOPUS:85014529525

VL - 49

SP - 16

EP - 20

JO - Indian Journal of Pharmacology

JF - Indian Journal of Pharmacology

SN - 0253-7613

IS - 1

ER -